Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T15:56:51.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of dehydroleucodine on meiosis reinitiation in Bufo arenarum denuded oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2007

G. Sánchez Toranzo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
O.S. Giordano
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
L.A. López
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
M.I. Bühler*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
*
All correspondence to: Marta I. Bühler, Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo, Chacabuco 461, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina. Fax: +54 381 4248025. e-mail: mbuhler@fbqf.unt.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In amphibian oocytes meiosis, the transition from G2 to M phase is regulated by the maturation promoting factor (MPF), a complex of the cyclin-dependent kinase p34/cdc2 and cyclin B. In immature oocytes there is an inactive complex (pre-MPF), in which cdc2 is phosphorylated on both Thr-161 and Thr-14/Tyr-15 residues. The dephosphorylation of Thr-14/Tyr-15 is necessary for the start of MPF activation and it is induced by the activation of cdc25 phosphatase. Late, to complete the activation, a small amount of active MPF induces an auto-amplification loop of MPF stimulation (MPF amplification). Dehydroleucodine (DhL) is a sesquiterpenic lactone that inhibits mammalian cell proliferation in G2. We asked whether DhL interferes with MPF activation. For this question, the effect of DhL (up to 30 μM) on the resumption of meiosis was evaluated, and visualized by germinal vesicle break down (GVBD), of Bufo arenarum oocytes induced in vitro by either: (i) removing follicle cells; (ii) progesterone stimulation; (iii) VG-content injection; or (iv) injection of mature cytoplasm. The results show that DhL induced GVBD inhibition, in a dose-dependent manner, in spontaneous and progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. Nevertheless, DhL at the doses assayed had no effect on GVBD induced by mature cytoplasm injection, but exerted an inhibitory effect on GVBD induced by GV content. On the basis of these results, we interpreted that DhL does not inhibit MPF amplification and that the target of DhL is any event in the early stages of the cdc25 activation cascade.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Figure 1 Effect of DhL on spontaneous and progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. Denuded oocytes competent or not competent to mature spontaneously were cultured in AR with different doses of DhL (5–30 μM) 60 min before the removal of follicular cells or the addition of progesterone (2.5 μM). GVBD was scored after 24 h of culture. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 5). Each experiment was performed on a different animal. *Significant difference to 0 μM DhL. p < 0.01 (one-way analysis of variance, ANOVA).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Effect of DhL on the GVBD in oocytes not competent to mature spontaneously injected with GV content. Denuded oocytes incompetent to mature spontaneously were preincubated with and without 15 μM DhL for 60 min and microinjected with 50 nl of GV content. Injected oocytes were incubated in AR with and without DhL (15 μM) for 16 h before GVBD scoring. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Each experiment was performed on a different animal.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Effect of DhL on MPF amplification in oocytes incompetent to mature spontaneously. Denuded oocytes incompetent to mature spontaneously were preincubated with and without DhL for 60 min and microinjected with 50 nl of mature cytoplasm. Injected oocytes were cultured in AR with and without DhL for 24 h and GVBD were scored. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Each experiment was performed on a different animal. *Significant difference to 0 μM DhL. p < 0.01 (one-way analysis of variance, ANOVA).