Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:52:22.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antimicrobial physician and pharmacist experience and perception of an antimicrobial Self-Stewardship Time-Out Program (SSTOP) intervention at eight Veterans’ Affairs medical centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2023

Cassie Cunningham GoedkenOpen the ORCID record for Cassie Cunningham Goedken[Opens in a new window],
Jorie M. Butler,
Joshua Judd,
Nui Brown,
Michael Rubin and
Matthew Bidwell GoetzOpen the ORCID record for Matthew Bidwell Goetz[Opens in a new window]
Cassie Cunningham Goedken*
Affiliation:
Center for Access Delivery & Research and Evaluation, (CADRE) Iowa City Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Jorie M. Butler
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UtahUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Joshua Judd
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UtahUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Nui Brown
Affiliation:
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
Michael Rubin
Affiliation:
Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UtahUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Matthew Bidwell Goetz
Affiliation:
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
*
Author for correspondence: Cassie Goedken, E-mail: cassie.goedken@va.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explored experiences and perceptions surrounding the Self-Stewardship Time-Out Program (SSTOP) intervention across implementation sites to improve antimicrobial use. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with Antibiotic Stewardship physicians and pharmacists, from which 5 key themes emerged. SSTOP may serve to achieve sustainable promotion of antibiotic use improvements.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 44 , Issue 9 , September 2023, pp. 1511 - 1514
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) that combine education, clinical guidelines, decision support, restrictions on antimicrobial use, and interventions to change antimicrobial therapy can reduce antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes. Reference Davey, Brown and Charani1 Continued development of effective implementation strategies to achieve sustainable improvements in antibiotic prescribing is needed. Reference Rzewuska, Charani and Clarkson2

Concerns about the consequences of inadequately treated infection often prompt initiation of unduly broad-spectrum and unneeded therapy antimicrobial therapy prior to the availability of microbiological or other data to substantiate infection diagnosis. Reference Schweitzer, van Werkhoven and Rodríguez3,Reference Avorn and Solomon4 Antibiotic timeouts, in which a reassessment of the continued need for continuation of initial antibiotic selection are undertaken when more diagnostic information is available, Reference Lee, Frenette, Jayaraman, Green and Pilote5,Reference Graber, Jones and Glassman6 are one CDC-recommended antibiotic stewardship intervention.

We used an antimicrobial Self-Stewardship Time Out Program (SSTOP) to evaluate the implementation of an “antibiotic timeout” intervention at Veterans’ Affairs medical centers. Reference Graber, Jones and Glassman6 Based on dual process theory Reference Jones, Butler and Graber7 , the SSTOP intervention requires providers to undertake a deliberative consideration of specific criteria before continuing therapy. Assisting the increased cognitive effort, SSTOP provides patient-specific decisional support by supplying clinical and microbiological information and links to educational guidelines. We assessed ASP physician and pharmacist experiences related to the SSTOP intervention across implementation sites.

Methods

SSTOP intervention

SSTOP introduced an automated templated note embedded in the electronic health record to prompt providers to review continued use of anti–methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) therapy (ie, vancomycin) and antipseudomonal β-lactam therapy 3 days after the initiation of antibiotics. SSTOP provided decisional support via an antibiotic dashboard that included a summary report of integrated clinical and laboratory data to assist in determining whether and how to adjust antibiotic therapy after three days of treatment. Facility-level quarterly reports on antibiotic de-escalation rates and usage of targeted antibiotics were provided to ASP physician and pharmacists. Reference Graber, Jones and Goetz8

Setting and participants

The ASP physicians and pharmacists were identified at each site and were invited to participate by e-mail. In-person site visits and individual semistructured interviews with ASP physicians and pharmacists (ie, ASP champions) were conducted at 8 Veterans’ Affairs medical center facilities from January 2019 to January 2021.

The study consent process and procedures were approved by the VA Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB no. 18-03) and by the Research and Development Committee at the Greater Los Angeles VA Health Care System.

Study design

We iteratively designed interview guides for preimplementation interviews (existing stewardship programs) and for postimplementation interviews (implementation process and challenges) (Appendix 1 online). Interviews were conducted via phone or video conference by the qualitative lead (J.B.), then they were audio-recorded and transcribed.

Data analysis

Transcripts were uploaded into MAXQDA, a qualitative data program (VERBI Software, Berlin, Germany). We performed thematic content analysis via consensus-based inductive and deductive coding (Appendix 2 online). Reference Pope9 Our analysis team included experienced qualitative researchers (C.C.G., J.J., and J.B.) with antimicrobial stewardship expertise.

Moreover, 13% of the transcripts were coded via group consensus (by C.C.G., J.J., and J.B.). This process involved all team members who coded transcripts prior to meetings where the final coding consensus was entered into MAXQDA during group discussion. The remaining 87% were coded by paired members of the analysis team (C.C.G. and J.J.). Discrepancies were resolved by the qualitative lead (J.B.) and/or the primary investigator (M.B.G.).

Results

In total, 13 preintervention interviews and 18 postintervention interviews were conducted with 7 ASP physician champions and 8 pharmacist champions. Two sites were unable to launch the note templates due to lack of resources; however, these sites utilized other SSTOP tools and participated in interviews. The SSTOP process and timeline are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

SSTOP process and timeline.

Preimplementation responses informed implementation by identifying perceived intervention barriers and facilitators. Pre- and postimplementation barriers and facilitators were similar; thus, we focused on the findings related to the SSTOP note template: feedback, challenges, and opportunities. Five primary themes emerged. Representative quotations are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Quotations of Key Themes From Semistructured Interviews With Antimicrobial Stewardship Physicians and Pharmacists (ie, ASP Champions)

Note. ASP, Antimicrobial stewardship program; SSTOP, self-stewardship time-out program; ID, infectious disease; MICU, medical intensive care unit; IT, information technology; CAC, clinical applications coordinators.

Theme 1: SSTOP intervention was perceived as valuable and straightforward

Feedback from ASP champions indicates ways in which prescribers were critical of aspects of the note template, but they liked the note template process overall and deemed it to be straightforward. ASP champions perceived that many providers valued the note template, indicating it was helpful in both thinking about antibiotics prior to initiation and for identification of appropriate antibiotics.

The data feedback reports developed and distributed by the SSTOP team allowed sites to see the intervention in action. Comparative rankings motivated sites to view their reports and to compare their antimicrobial use. Several sites indicated their intent to continue using the SSTOP templates after study completion.

Theme 2. Strong existing stewardship and local culture facilitated SSTOP implementation

Facilitators of successful implementation included pre-existing strong stewardship support, participation of local champions (eg, infectious disease fellow), and implementation setting (eg, medicine service). Implementing the templates first in a setting led by a group of clinicians with low resistance helped ensure the success of the template.

Theme 3. Implementation barriers included staff turnover (eg, rotating residents), service level support (ie, surgery service), insufficient information technology (IT) support, and the need to remind providers to use the template

Many facilities involved in the SSTOP intervention were academic/teaching institutions, thus as each new set of residents rotated through their facility extra time/effort was required to ensure everyone was educated on the SSTOP templates and protocols. Installing the SSTOP templates required access and support of clinical applications coordinators (CACs) at each site. Some sites lacked steady access to this resource and therefore experienced challenges and delays in SSTOP implementation. The primary perceived barrier to SSTOP template utilization was lack or loss of a local champion to ensure that the template was completed.

Theme 4. Recommendations largely centered on enhancing note template usability and SSTOP feedback reports (eg, inclusion of patient/provider-level data)

Sites offered suggestions to improve note template usability, such as having an open text field embedded within the note and including provider-level antimicrobial use in feedback reports.

Theme 5. COVID-19 affected clinical practice and SSTOP implementation

All sites reported that high volumes of COVID-19 cases were a significant challenge. Specific pandemic-related barriers included reduction of stewardship activities such as regular MRSA screening practices, weekly stewardship rounds, and stewardship committee planning. Other barriers included changes in workflow due to staff working from home and staff being pulled into multiple directions (eg, writing COVID-19 policies), which complicated the implementation of SSTOP.

Discussion

We identified facilitators of and barriers to SSTOP implementation and related antibiotic stewardship activity as well as the impact of COVID-19 on these activities. Reference Jones, Butler and Graber7 The SSTOP note templates were considered generally valuable and straightforward (theme 1). Dual process theory is a meta-theory explaining one’s motivation, attention, and decision making. We used it to design the SSTOP tools to direct clinicians toward system 2 thinking, that is, rule-based, deliberative cognitive processing. Concurrently, we facilitated the development of more stewardship-friendly automatic system 1 thinking by supporting patterns of thought and behavior that will make appropriate stewardship more intuitive. Reference Jones, Butler and Graber7 As in our prior work, clinicians using SSTOP templates explicitly reported their cognition guided by templates. Reference Jones, Butler and Graber7

Implementation was facilitated by local champions and a strong culture of stewardship (theme 2). Conversely, barriers to implementation included the complex mission of facilities with roles in education and training and IT support issues such as coordination with CACs (theme 3). Many of these barriers may be difficult to overcome; however, themes 2 and 3 reflect the importance of a stewardship culture and social and tangible support for attending physicians and residents to participate in that culture. The importance of culture is further supported by theme 4, tailoring to the site-specific context.

Clinicians noted the motivating factor of comparison to other facilities, which may point to the important process of social comparison in this context that could be studied further and used to strengthen stewardship interventions. Reference Meeker, Linder and Fox10 Clinicians indicated the template facilitated earlier involvement with ID specialists, a potential enhancement to collaboration that may strengthen clinician–ASP relations.

The impact of the emergence of COVID-19 (theme 5) was far-reaching due to temporary cessations of stewardship activities, briefly, at-home work schedules, and demands for ID specialists to help develop COVID-19 policies and provide patient care.

This study had one limitation. We focused on ASP physician and pharmacist experiences in this study. Thus, the experiences of prescribing clinicians were not captured.

Our findings support the value of the SSTOP “time out” intervention as an effective antibiotic stewardship strategy, and we identified potential barriers to implementation. Plans for continued utilization of the note templates after the project concluded suggests that SSTOP may serve to achieve sustainable promotion of antibiotic use improvements.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.266

Acknowledgments

The views presented in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs or the US government.

Financial support

Financial support for this work was supported by the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI award no. QUE 15-269).

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. A version of this study was presented at Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Conference April 13–16, 2021, held virtually, and at the 14th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health, December 14–16, 2021, held virtually.

References

Davey, P, Brown, E, Charani, E, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;4:CD003543.Google Scholar
Rzewuska, M, Charani, E, Clarkson, JE, et al. Prioritizing research areas for antibiotic stewardship programmes in hospitals: a behavioural perspective consensus paper. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019;25:163–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweitzer, VA, van Werkhoven, CH, Rodríguez, J, et al. Optimizing design of research to evaluate antibiotic stewardship interventions: consensus recommendations of a multinational working group. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avorn, J, Solomon, DH. Cultural and economic factors that (mis)shape antibiotic use: the nonpharmacologic basis of therapeutics. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:128–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, TC, Frenette, C, Jayaraman, D, Green, L, Pilote, L. Antibiotic self-stewardship: trainee-led structured antibiotic time-outs to improve antimicrobial use. Ann Intern Med 2014;161 suppl 10:S53–S58.10.7326/M13-3016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graber, CJ, Jones, MM, Glassman, PA, et al. Taking an antibiotic time-out: utilization and usability of a self-stewardship time-out program for renewal of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. Hosp Pharm 2015;50:1011–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M, Butler, J, Graber, CJ, et al. Think twice: a cognitive perspective of an antibiotic timeout intervention to improve antibiotic use. J Biomed Inform 2017 Jul;71S:S22–S31.10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graber, CJ, Jones, MM, Goetz, MB, et al. Decreases in antimicrobial use associated with multihospital implementation of electronic antimicrobial stewardship tools. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:1168–1176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, CMN. Qualitative Research in Health Care, Third Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006.10.1002/9780470750841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, D, Linder, JA, Fox, CR, et al. Effect of behavioral interventions on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315:562–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1.SSTOP process and timeline.

Figure 1

Table 1.Quotations of Key Themes From Semistructured Interviews With Antimicrobial Stewardship Physicians and Pharmacists (ie, ASP Champions)

Supplementary material: File

Goedken et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Goedken et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.6 KB