Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:33:48.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A tale of two extinctions: converging end-Permian and end-Triassic scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2015

BAS VAN DE SCHOOTBRUGGE*
Affiliation:
Marine Palynology & Paleoceanography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, The Netherlands
PAUL B. WIGNALL
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
†Author for correspondence: B.vanderSchootbrugge@uu.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The end-Permian (c. 252 Ma) and end-Triassic (c. 201 Ma) mass-extinction events are commonly linked to the emplacement of the large igneous provinces of the Siberia Traps and Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, respectively. Accordingly, scenarios for both extinctions are increasingly convergent and cross-fertilization of ideas has become important. Here, we present a synthesis of extinction scenarios based on a critical assessment of the available palaeontological, sedimentological, geochemical and geophysical evidence. How similar were the extinction events, what gaps exist in our understanding and how can a comparison of the events enhance our understanding of each event individually? Our focus is on the most important proximate kill mechanisms including: climate change and atmospheric pollution; increased soil erosion, weathering and runoff; forest dieback and the spread of pathogens; and ocean temperature changes, anoxia and acidification. There is substantial evidence to suggest that very similar kill mechanisms acted upon late Permian as well as Late Triassic ecosystems, strengthening the hypothesis that the ultimate causes of the mass-extinction events were similar.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Overview of radiometric dated occurrences of impact craters (modified after Schmieder et al.2014) and flood basalt flows, sills and dykes (Siberian Traps: Reichow et al.2009; CAMP: Marzoli et al.2011; Blackburn et al.2013). The age for the Norian–Rhaetian boundary (205.3 Ma) is modified after Wotzlaw et al. (2014). The timescale was created with the free shareware TimescaleCreator v6.3.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Synsedimentary tectonics within the base of the Blue Lias Formation at Pinhay Bay (close to Lyme Regis). Compare figure 3 of Wignall (2001b). Small polygonal fault sets leading to soft-sediment deformation. (b) Slump folds within the Cotham Member of the Lilstock Formation on the foreshore of St Audrie's Bay. (c) Soft sediment deformation within the base of the Blue Lias Formation at Pinhay Bay (close to Lyme Regis). Compare figure 3 of Wignall (2001b). (d) Calcareous debris-flow bed within the upper part of the Cotham Member. Compare figure 3 of Wignall (2001b).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Aberrant pollen and spores from the end-Triassic extinction interval (scale bars are 20 μm). (a) Ricciisporites tuberculatus from the uppermost Rhaetian deposits at Larne (Northern Ireland). This enigmatic gymnosperm pollen that has distinct and highly variable surface ornamentation became one of the major victims of the ETME. (b) Kraeuselisporites reissingerii from the lowermost Hettangian deposits of Larne. These lycopsid spore-tetrads proliferate in the direct aftermath of the end-Triassic extinction, similar to that observed for the end-Permian mass extinction. The unseparated tetrads are possibly reflecting increased environmental stress. (c, d) Classopollis torosus tetrads from the lowermost Hettangian deposits in the Schandelah-1 core from north Germany. These unseparated tetrads consisting of more than 4 pollen grains likely reflect an environmental stress response. Unreduced (polyploid) Classopollis-tetrads have been interpreted by (Kürschner, Batenburg & Mander, 2013) to explain the success of cheirolepid conifers following the ETME. (e) Trisaccate version of a normally bisaccate Vitreisporites pallidus from Rhaetian sediments in the Schandelah-1 core. (f) Quadrisaccate version of a normally bisaccate pollen grain related to Pinuspollenites minimus from the lowermost Hettangian section in the Rosswinkel core from Luxemburg.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Conceptual framework to explain the abundance of high-molecular-weight and low-molecular-weight PAHs in boundary strata from the end-Permian and end-Triassic extinction events. The HMW compounds are generated via high-temperature charring of organic matter, coals or hydrocarbons during LIP emplacement. LMW compounds are generated via forest fires and weathering of soils.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Disease triangle, a conceptual framework introduced by Stevens (1960) to explain interactions between the environment, pathogens and plants in driving disease. Environmental changes influence both pathogens and plants. For example, acid rain may weaken the immune defence of plants, while at the same time warming may lead to increased virulence of pathogens (e.g. root rot fungi). Together these factors drive increased risk of infection and disease as a proximate kill mechanism. (b) Tolerance curve as a function of temperature for pathogenic fungi (modified from Yáñez-López, 2012) showing optimal range and absence in regions with exceptionally low (high latitudes) and/or high temperatures (low latitudes).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Comparison of extinction rates for poorly buffered and moderately buffered groups of calcareous organisms during the end-Permian (modified from Payne & Clapham, 2012) and end-Triassic extinction events (Hautmann, Benton & Tomasovych, 2008). Cnidarians were among the hardest-hit groups in both extinction events, leading to prolonged periods without significant reef build-ups (‘reef gaps’).

Figure 6

Figure 7. (a) Uppermost Rhaetian mudstones with giant megalodontid bivalves in the Mount Messapion section (Greece). These large bivalves abruptly disappear at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary (e.g. Romano et al.2008), providing a dramatic example of a crisis in biocalcification during the ETME. (b) Topmost bed of the Rhaetian Zu Limestone Formation in the Val Adrara section (Southern Alps, Italy). This bed contains abundant recrystallized scleractinian corals and other bioclasts, and is abruptly overlain by thin-bedded limestones of the Malanotte Formation (see also Bachan et al.2012 for lithological logs). (c) Abundant early diagenetic cements in the Hettangian Valle Agricola section (Apennines, Italy). Similar sedimentary features also characterize the Hettangian deposits further south in the Monte Cefalo section close to Naples (see Bachan et al.2012), perhaps suggesting carbonate supersaturation in shallow oceans due to a breakdown in biological carbonate precipitation. (d) Photograph of the Permian–Triassic boundary bed in the Çürük Dag section in Turkey showing sharp irregular contact between a Gymnocodium packstone and a pelsparite.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Comparison of proximate kill mechanisms for the end-Permian and end-Triassic extinction showing quality of evidence and locations where key evidence has been presented (non-exhaustive). (a) 1, Italy (Dolomites); 2, South Africa (Karoo Basin); 3, Canada (Sverdrup Basin); 4, China (Nanpanjiang Basin); 5, Australia; 6, Siberia (Tunguska Basin); 7, Svalbard; 8, Pakistan; 9, Israel; 10, Oman; 11, Turkey (Taurus Mountains); 12, Greenland; 13, Iran; 14, Japan; 15, Antarctica. (b) 1, Germany (north and south); 2, Poland; 3, Greenland; 4, Austria (GSSP and nearby sections); 5, United States (eastern); 6, Sweden (Scania); 7, Denmark; 8, Hungary; 9, Italy (Southern Alps, Apennines); 10, England (Somerset); 11, Luxemburg; 12, Canada (Haida Gwaii); 13, United States (southwest); 14, Canada (Williston Basin).