Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-w5jd6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T01:53:32.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production of lightweight expanded aggregates from smectite clay, palygorskite-rich sediment and phosphate sludge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

Sameh Jaha*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (LR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes (FSG), University of Gabes, Zrig, Gabes, Tunisia
João Carvalheiras
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering/CICECO – Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus of Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
Salah Mahmoudi
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (LR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes (FSG), University of Gabes, Zrig, Gabes, Tunisia
João Labrincha
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering/CICECO – Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus of Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Sameh Jaha; Email: samah.jahha@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lightweight expanded clay aggregates (LWAs) are porous materials with low density and high strength (EN-13055-1), and they are important in sustainable construction through their lightweight nature and ability to provide thermal or acoustic insulation. The objective of this work was therefore to evaluate the preparation of LWAs using a smectite clay (M1 formulation), whose application in common ceramic production is difficult. An alternative approach was proposed for the valorization of phosphate sludge and a palygorskite-rich sediment by mixing them with expanded clay (M2 formulation) for LWA production. This could result in economically cost-effective products with significant environmental benefits. Pellets were prepared and fired at various temperatures (1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C), and relevant properties such as bloating index, density, water absorption and compressive strength were determined. Additionally, the microstructure, mineralogical transformations and phase compositions under various sintering temperatures were investigated. Increasing the temperature from 1000°C to 1150°C significantly improved the expansion properties of LWAs, and 1150°C seemed to be the optimal firing temperature at which the best expansion properties were achieved. In addition, the incorporation of the selected waste improved the properties of the final products, leading to lower density, greater strength and greater bloating with the development of the internal pore structure as compared to the LWAs without this addition. Because of their low density (0.6 g cm–3) and sufficient compressive strength (0.86 MPa), the manufactured LWAs can be used in construction (as insulating panels or in lightweight concrete) and in green roofs.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition of the tested formulations (wt.%).

Figure 1

Figure 1. The protocol followed for the manufacture of the LWAs.

Figure 2

Table 2. Chemical composition (wt.%) of the studied materials and other clays mentioned in the literature that were used in the LWA production.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (a) XRD traces of the studied materials (bulk samples) of the SmC (green trace), PalS (blue trace) and PhS (red trace) samples. (b) XRD traces of the oriented aggregates of the SmC and PalS samples. Cal= calcite; Dol = dolomite; Fap = fluoroapatite; Gp = gypsum; Ilt = illite; Kln = kaolinite; Plg = palygorskite; Qz = quartz; Sme = smectite.

Figure 4

Table 3. Mineralogical composition of the starting raw materials.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Thermal analyses (DSC-TGA) of the raw materials: (a) SmC, (b) PalS and (c) PhS.

Figure 6

Table 4. Particle-size distribution (%) and Atterberg limits (%) of the raw materials.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Particle-size distribution of the raw materials.

Figure 8

Figure 5. XRD traces of (a) M1 and (b) M2 pellets fired at 1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C. Ak = akermanite; An = anorthite; Crs = cristobalite; Di = diopside; Fap = fluorapatite; Hem = hematite; Mag = magnetite; Qz = quartz.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Images of M1 and M2 pellets (the external aspect and the inner part) fired at various temperatures.

Figure 10

Figure 7. SEM images of the shell and inner core of M1 (100% SmC) and M2 (50% SmC + 25% PalS + 25% PhS) pellets sintered at 1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C.

Figure 11

Figure 8. EDS spectra of the M1 and M2 LWAs at 1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C.

Figure 12

Figure 9. (a) EDS elemental mapping of the M1 LWAs at 1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C. (b) EDS elemental mapping of the M2 LWAs at 1100°C, 1125°C and 1150°C.

Figure 13

Figure 10. Physical and mechanical properties of sintered LWAs as a function of temperature.

Figure 14

Table 5. Physical properties of the studied LWAs and the commercial LWA.