Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:37:38.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing methods and property evaluation of Al2O3 and SiC reinforced metal matrix composites based on aluminium 2xxx alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

P. Ashwath*
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Department, School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore-632014, India
M. Anthony Xavior
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Department, School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore-632014, India
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ashwathp90@gmail.com

Abstract

Powder metallurgy processing of aluminum alloy based metal matrix composites (MMC) is realized to be a promising alternative as expected to advance rapidly compared to other conventional methods. This paper reviews the extensive development in metal–matrix composite research works with particular focus on aluminum alloys 2xxx series as metal–matrix particulates processed by powder metallurgy route. Effect of reinforcement materials such as SiC and Al2O3 on the mechanical properties of the composites manufactured through conventional methods and powder metallurgy route are compared and presented. The influence of percentage of reinforcement material on the overall properties of the MMC's as reported by the researchers are presented. Summary on fundamental aspects of manufacturing MMC's via powder metallurgy route, the effect of mechanical properties, tribological properties, and microstructural properties are presented. Eventually, some advantages of powder metallurgy method are mentioned which may substantiate the claim to consider this as a novel method for near net shape manufacturing.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

TABLE I. List of aluminum alloy series and its applications.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Blackish grey colored SiC powder and white colored Al2O3 particles.

Figure 2

TABLE II. Properties of silicon carbide (SiC) and alumina (Al2O3) particulates.

Figure 3

FIG. 2. Tensile properties of the aluminum and composites and yield strength for nano-Al2O3/Al composites compared with experimental results.16

Figure 4

FIG. 3. Effect of alumina particle size and weight percentage on the strength parameters of the composites.25

Figure 5

FIG. 4. Stress strain behavior of aluminum material reinforced with various percentage of SiC and Al2O3 ceramic particulates.5

Figure 6

FIG. 5. Variation of hardness versus aging time for 2024Al-20 vol% SiC composite and 2024 Al alloy aged at 191 °C and solutionized at 495 °C for: (a) 1 h; (b) 2 h; (c) 3 h.17

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Variation of COF and wear loss with SiC content.40

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Effect of matrix alloy on (a) wear rate; (b) maximum temperature; (c) coefficient of friction; (d) seizure pressure; sliding velocity: 3.35 m/s.46

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Effect of wear loss, initial wear rate and steady state wear wrt sliding distance and volume percentage for three different type of reinforcement.44

Figure 10

FIG. 9. Normalized wear rate of MMCs as function of Vf. (a) Whisker reinforcement MMC, (b) fiber reinforced MMC and (c) particle reinforced MMC.44

Figure 11

FIG. 10. (a) A picture of a porous Ti2AlC preform, and SEM images of (b) showing open pores and struts, (c) showing both closed pores and open pores. (d) A picture of an as infiltrated AA 6061/Ti2AlC composite, and SEM images of (e) showing AA 6061 (dark gray) infiltrated into the open pores, (f) enlarged view on the strut showing Ti2AlC (1, light), titanium aluminide (2, gray), and Al2O3 (3, dark).53

Figure 12

FIG. 11. SEM images of sintered MMC's (a) Al-10% SiC-12 µm and (b) Al-10% SiC-16 µm. Some porosity is indicated by the arrows.31

Figure 13

FIG. 12. SEM micrographs showing the effect of 12 µm Al2O3 particle content on the microstructure (LHF a, b, c) and the effect of Al2O3 particle size on the microstructure (RHF a, b, c).35

Figure 14

FIG. 13. SEM images of Ni coated Al-SiC composites.34

Figure 15

FIG. 14. SEM photographs of the worn out surfaces of MMCs in steady-state wear regime (sliding distance 1000 m). (a) SiC-whisker, Vfw = 5%; (b) SiC-whisker, Vfw = 29%; (c) Al2O3-fiber, Vff = 5%; (d) Al2O3-fiber, Vff = 19%; (e) SiC-particle, Vfp = 5% and (f) SiC-particle, Vfp = 10%.44

Figure 16

FIG. 15. SEM morphologies of the worn out surface of Al 2024 matrix at applied load of 20 N. (a) Low-magnification micrograph and (b) high-magnification micrograph.41