The scholar al-Walīd ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Qurṭubī transmitted from his teacher, the famous jurist and traditionist ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Ḥabīb (d. 238/852),Footnote 1 that the Friday mosque of Cordoba was the “most meritorious of the temples of al-Andalus” (afḍal bayt yakūnu bil-Andalus). Almost four centuries later another scholar, Abū Sulaymān ibn Ḥawṭ Allāh (d. 612/1215), stated that had he the power (ḥukm) to do so, he would oblige the people of al-Andalus to perform pilgrimage (ziyāra) to that mosque.Footnote 2
Such ziyāra does not seem ever to have been established, in spite of the high symbolic value attached to a religious building which was erected by the first independent Umayyad ruler of al-Andalus, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān I (r. 138/756–172/788), and which underwent remodelling and amplifications by some of his successors.Footnote 3 The Cordoban Friday mosque was associated closely and in many ways with Umayyad history, as well as with Umayyad political and religious authority and legitimacy.Footnote 4 Most especially, it was one of the means by which the Umayyad rulers of al-Andalus linked their capital city, Cordoba, to Medina, the town of the Prophet and also that of Mālik ibn Anas, the scholar considered to be the founder of the legal school that came to predominate in al-Andalus. This was so because the Cordoban mosque layout was associated with the mosque in Medina, while its famous minbar – ordered to be built by al-Ḥakam II (r. 350/961–366/976), the second Umayyad Cordoban caliph – evoked the pulpit of the Prophet Muḥammad.Footnote 5 The mosque also contained an ʿUthmānic Quranic codex.Footnote 6 Very few references to this Quran, however, are found in the earliest sources, while it rises to prominence in Almohad times. It was then paraded throughout the empire, accompanying the Almohad caliph in his travels and military campaigns, in order to impress on his subjects the link between the Almohad caliphate and that of the Cordoban Umayyads – also, ultimately, a link to the Prophet.Footnote 7
Abū Sulaymān Ibn Ḥawṭ Allāh, the scholar who wished to oblige people to perform pious visits or pilgrimages to the Cordoban mosque, lived under the Almohads, at a time – the sixth/twelfth century – when the existence of holy placesFootnote 8 in the Islamic West becomes a salient feature both in the literary sources at our disposal and in the archaeological remains. This was especially so in the Maghrib, on the other side of the Straits of Gibraltar, comprising what are now parts of Libya, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. The Muʾminid caliphs established a shrine in Tinmal (southern Morocco), a place that some scholars have described as “the Almohad Medina” because the Almohad Mahdī Ibn Tūmart (d. 524/1130) emigrated there from his home town in Igilliz and was later buried there. A mosque was later built, and starting with Ibn Tūmart's successor – ʿAbd al-Muʾmin, the first Almohad caliph – regular visits were paid to it. The site also became the Muʾminid dynastic burial site.Footnote 9 Marrakech, the capital city that the Almohads had taken from the previous dynasty, the Almoravids, prided itself on housing the graves of a number of great scholars, sufis and saints, buried intra muros.Footnote 10 Holy places were not lacking in other areas of the Maghrib. Massa on the southern coast of what is now Morocco was considered to be the place where the Mahdī would appear,Footnote 11 while the cemeteries of Ceuta hosted many graves of saints to which visits were paid by believers who wanted to benefit from their blessings (baraka); some of them even succeeded in being buried near those holy men.Footnote 12 Many more examples could be added to these, although we must regret the lack of a monograph devoted to mapping the sacred geographyFootnote 13 of the Islamic West during the medieval period.Footnote 14
With regard to al-Andalus, from the sixth/twelfth century onwards places considered to be holy can be documented in a variety of textual sources: historical, geographical, biographical, hagiographical, belles lettres or poetry. Graves stand out in this respect, as shown in the life of the saint Abū Marwān al-Yuḥānisī (seventh/thirteenth century),Footnote 15 or in the eschatological treatise by Ibn al-Kharrāṭ al-Ishbīlī (d. 581/1185). He recommended burying the dead near the graves of the pious (ṣāliḥūn) and doers of good deeds (ahl al-khayr) in order to obtain baraka and intercession (tawassul).Footnote 16 In order to facilitate this recommendation, the scholar Ibn al-Ṭaylasān (d. 642/1244) mapped the location of saintly graves in Cordoba in a work entitled Kitāb al-tabyīnʿan manāqib man ʿurifa qabruhu wa-shuhira faḍluhu wa-dhikruhu mimman kāna bi-Qurṭuba min al-tābiʿīn wal-ʿulamāʾ al-ṣāliḥīn wal-ʿubbād al-mutabattalīn wal-zuhhād al-mujtahidīn alladhīna taʿarrafat al-baraka wa-ijābat al-duʿāʾ ʿinda qubūrihimʿalā marr al-sanīn.Footnote 17 Among those who managed to fulfil the recommendation, the scholar Ibn al-Sharrāṭ (d. c. 586/1190) was buried in front of the grave of ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Ḥabīb.Footnote 18 It is reported that when some fifty years after ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Ḥabīb's death another scholar (Ibn Waḍḍāḥ) was buried beside him, his body and shroud were found to be intact, and a piece of the shroud was brought to the Umayyad emir ʿAbdallāh (r. 275/888–300/912).Footnote 19
Zawiyas and rabitas, often associated with graves, punctuated Andalusī territory as shown not only by archaeological surveysFootnote 20 but also by literary sources, including legal discussions about practices related to them.Footnote 21 Most famous was the zāwiya of the Banū Sīdi Būnuh in Guadalest (near Denia, in the east of al-Andalus), founded by Abū Aḥmad Jaʿfar ibn ʿAbdallāh (d. 624/1227), a pupil of Abū Madyan during his riḥla to the East. He was buried there and his tomb became a centre for pilgrimage (ziyāra).Footnote 22 The existence of Muslim pilgrimages (romerías), some of which were allowed by the new non-Muslim rulers, is documented after the Christian conquest.Footnote 23 In 1336, King Peter IV imposed a fee of five dinars on any Muslim coming to visit the shrine at Atzeneta, “where a certain Saracen whom they hold as a prophet is said to have died, and who is venerated with prayers and other activities”.Footnote 24
Tracing a similar sacred geography in Umayyad al-Andalus is not an easy task. There is abundant information about performing the pilgrimage to MeccaFootnote 25 but almost no indication of visits to local Muslim shrines. One would expect them to be associated with local holy men, but, as Manuela Marín has pointed out, Andalusis seem to have been very restrained in this field, at least as reflected in the written record.Footnote 26 Ibn al-Faraḍī (d. 403/1013) tells us of a scholar who had settled in the ribāṭ of Gormaz and died there: his grave was visited but by Christians after their conquest in 399/1008–9.Footnote 27 This scarcity of data on Muslim holy places in Umayyad al-Andalus has to be related to the process of Islamicization.
During the period considered here (from the conquest in 92/711 to 422/1031, this last being the date when the Umayyad caliphate was abolished in Cordoba), Christians constituted the majority of the population and thus most holy places must have reflected their beliefs and practices, although again information is scarce.Footnote 28 One Christian source quoting the fourth/tenth-century Cordoban historian al-Rāzī states that the Muslim conquerors destroyed Christian churches and burned the bodies of Christian saints,Footnote 29 perhaps evoking the burning of the executed Cordoban Christians who had sought martyrdom during the third/ninth century. Through these burnings of Christians the Muslim authorities sought to prevent the emergence of a cult of their relics and the founding of sanctuaries associated with them.Footnote 30 But there is no real evidence of a systematic destruction of Christian churches and holy places by the Muslim conquerors, and very little evidence of the conversion of churches into mosques.Footnote 31 Christian converts to Islam probably shared with their former coreligionists their respect and veneration for places they held to be holy, in spite of normative disapproval of Muslims praying in churches and synagogues.Footnote 32 Umayyad legal sources document how Muslim jurists had to deal with the fact that converts to Islam, especially through their non-Muslim relatives, kept close links with their former places of worship: one jurist was asked whether a son could accompany his Christian mother to church.Footnote 33 A shared holy placeFootnote 34 was the so-called Kanīsat al-gurāb or Church of the Crows, situated on the Cape of San Vicente on the Atlantic Ocean. The Muslims who visited (yazūru) the mosque situated in front of the church – or perhaps the church itself – were counted by a crow, whose cawings told the Christian priests how much food they had to prepare for the visitors in order to fulfil their obligation of ḍiyāfa.Footnote 35 If data on Christian holy places is scarce, similar places not attached to monotheism but connected with pre-Christian beliefs and practices, whether those of the local population or those brought by the conquerors, are completely absent. Trees and stones are known to have been objects of veneration in both Arabia and North Africa.Footnote 36 In the Iberian Peninsula, the so-called olive tree of San Torcuato and its wonders are described in both Latin and Arabic sources.Footnote 37
The slow process of Islamicization of the Andalusi population can be grasped through onomastic data, the emergence of Muslim scholars and the building of mosques,Footnote 38 but the development of local Muslim holy places largely escapes us. Some examples, however, can be offered.
Ḥanash al-Ṣanʿānī, one of the Successors of the Prophet Muhammad, was buried in the town of Saragossa in the Ebro valley. He was alleged to have arrived in al-AndalusFootnote 39 and to have founded the local mosque and established the orientation of its miḥrāb. The location of his grave was known and visited by those who travelled to the town for different reasons.Footnote 40 By the mid-fifth/eleventh century, the traditionist and geographer al-ʿUdhrīFootnote 41 mentions that both Ḥanash's grave and that of another Successor of the Prophet, ʿAlī ibn Rabāḥ al-Lakhmī, also buried in the same town, were situated in the cemetery of the Bāb al-qibla and appeared as some sort of vertical elevation made of stone (ahdāf min al-ḥijāra).Footnote 42 Al-ʿUdhrī asked the qāḍī of Saragossa, in the presence of a group of jurists, why no funerary construction was built over them so as to serve as orientation for those who wanted to go there in search of blessing. The judge replied that one of the emirs of the town of Saragossa had intended to erect a mausoleum over the place where they were buried, in order to distinguish them from other graves and to signal them for those who had not seen them. But a pious (ṣāliḥa) woman went to see the emir and told him that the two buried men had visited her in her dreams, telling her that the idea of building something over their graves was repugnant to them and that they should stay as they were. When the woman finished her story, the emir declined to build the intended funerary constructions.
According to normative Maliki (and more generally Sunnī) regulations, graves had to be excavated underground and were supposed to lack any external mark. More importantly no building of any sort could be erected over them, as no distinction should be made among believers after death.Footnote 43 In this case, the ahdāf min al-ḥijāra would have allowed visitors to identify them, as al-ʿUdhrī’s text indicates that they went there on purpose looking for their baraka. This suggests ziyārat al-qubūr, i.e., intentional visiting of the graves of the two Prophet's Successors who were buried in Saragossa. But when the ziyāra practice stimulated the initiative of building funerary constructions over the graves, a miraculous intervention was needed to stop it: the pious woman's dream powerfully conveys the dangers of following a practice unequivocally condemned as un-Islamic.
Such condemnation can be linked with some of the materials found in the Cordoban Ibn Waḍḍāḥ’ṣ (d. 287/900) treatise against religious innovations, under the heading of the rejection of ittibāʿ āthār al-nabī.Footnote 44 Ibn Waḍḍāḥ collected reports in which Mālik ibn Anas disapproved of intentional visiting of certain places visited by the Prophet or having a special significance during his life, transforming them into shrines where people prayed. The opposition is formulated as a rejection of practices followed by Jews and Christians, who fell into perdition as believers because they adopted innovations. If one of their prophets had once prayed in a place just by chance, they converted the place into a temple or shrine where they went deliberately to pray. The second rightly guided caliph ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb exhorted the faithful not to follow their example: in this spirit he ordered the tree of Ḥudaybiyya – under which Muslims had sworn obedience to the Prophet – to be cut down because it had become a place of pilgrimage.Footnote 45 Mālik and other Medinan scholars declared themselves opposed to practices that tended to convert the numerous traces (āthār) of the Prophet in Medina into places of worship; the only exceptions were the mosque of Qubā and the graves of the martyrs at Uḥud, although not even then was there consensus about excluding them. No exception is made in Ibn Waddah's text, even for Jerusalem: it cannot become a pilgrimage centre.Footnote 46 Mālik's opposition to any such innovative practice even if performed with good intentions (wa-in kānat fi khayr) – praying in a place connected with the Prophet seems in principle to be a good practice – is motivated by the danger that such practice may become a custom, eventually acquiring the condition of an established tradition or a recommended precept (sunna). The dangerous possibility is lurking here of creating practices that will rival those prescribed as obligatory by the Revealed Law.Footnote 47 What is to be feared is the creation of shrines that compete with those of Mecca and Medina, and of pilgrimages to them that compete with that to the Kaʿba. Associated practices, such as performing the rituals of ʿArafa outside the Ḥijāz, are also condemned,Footnote 48 as it may mean the transfer of sacred time and space outside its proper context.
The attention Ibn Waḍḍāḥ devoted to this problem can be related to a contemporary Andalusi practice. A younger Cordoban, the famous esoteric (bāṭinī) thinker Ibn Masarra (d. 319/931), clearly believed that certain places had special meanings and powers. In his dwelling in Cordoba he reproduced the room of Mary the Copt, the Christian slave who bore the Prophet his son Ibrāhīm. The information comes from Muḥammad ibn Ḥazm al-Tanūkhī, known as Ibn al-Madīnī, who reported that:
Ibn Masarra, during his stay in Medina, used to visit the places connected with the Prophet (kāna … yatatabbaʿu āthār al-nabī). Someone among the inhabitants of Medina showed him the house (dār) of Māriya, the mother of Ibrāhīm, slave-concubine of the Prophet. He went to visit it and saw that it was an elegant (laṭīfa) little house, surrounded by gardens, in the eastern part of the town, which measured exactly the same in length and width. It was divided in the middle by a wall supporting a platform of thick wood. One ascended there by an elegant exterior staircase, and in the upper part there were two rooms (baytāni) and a roofed gallery where the Prophet used to sit in the summer. I saw how Ibn Masarra, after praying in those two rooms, in the roofed gallery and in every corner of the house, measured one of the two rooms with his palms. Afterwards, when Ibn Masarra had settled in the Jabal and I returned, I asked him to reveal to me the meaning of all that and he answered: “This room where you see me now, I built in the shape of that one, without adding or diminishing in its length or width”.Footnote 49
Mary the Copt was a slave and a non-Arab, like Ibn Masarra, of muwallad origin. The site of her house was one of the places visited by Muslims during their pilgrimage.Footnote 50 Mary had borne the Prophet his son Ibrāhīm and she was treated in some sources as a link between Muslims and Christians, as if Ibrāhīm's birth had made them kindred, thus strengthening the kinship tie established through Hagar, who was also a Copt according to some accounts, and who as the mother of Abraham's son Ismāʿīl was the ancestress of the Arabs.Footnote 51 Mary the Copt was also associated with the alchemical and magical traditions of Egypt through an alchemical tract attributed to someone with the same name,Footnote 52 and one of the sources quoted by Maslama al-Qurṭubī (d. 353/964) in his alchemical tract Rutbat al-ḥakīm is precisely Mary the Copt.
In order to carry out his teachings, Ibn Masarra had left Cordoba and established himself in the mountains near the Umayyad capital (hence his nisba al-Jabalī), a move that has been interpreted by some as seeking not only isolation but also escape from religious control. It was in that mountainous location – where Christian monasteries had functioned since pre-Islamic times – that he reconstructed the space associated with Mary the Copt's house. It was also in the mountains near Cordoba that ʿAbd al-Raḥmān III built his caliphal town of Madīnat al-Zahrā. For Ibn Masarra, the attainment of knowledge consists of an ascent through the ladder of creation, from the plants to the contemplation of the stars. We might ask if such a concept was related to Ibn Masarra's choice of dwelling in an elevated place close to the sky and also to the site of Madīnat al-Zahrāʾ chosen by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān III, a location that together with other elements suggests that the palatine town was identified with Paradise.Footnote 53 This starting point would later lead to the identification of the whole of al-Andalus with Paradise, especially when the Christian conquests and the military advance of another religion motivated some to clamour for armed militancy and martyrdom.Footnote 54
Another aspect of interest is that there is no indication whatsoever in the two examples of fully Islamic sites (the graves of the Prophet's Successors in Saragossa and Ibn Masarra's reconstruction in the Cordoban mountains of a Medinan place linked with the Prophet's life) that they were associated with pre-Islamic holy places in the Iberian Peninsula – an association that has been shown to exist in so many other cases in human history.Footnote 55 This assertion does not imply that such an association did not exist, only that the Arabic and other sources do not tell us anything that may lead us to believe that it existed. What the Arabic sources reveal is a link with Muslim sacred history that had taken place elsewhere. Through such a link, two local places acquired a religious meaning, even if contested.
There were places that commemorated local Islamic history also, such as the Mosque of the Banners in Algeciras (masjid al-rāyāt) associated with the Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula and with a prestigious Muslim, Mūsā ibn Nuṣayr, considered by some to have been a Successor of the Prophet Muḥammad. He would have established the qibla of the mosque, as the Successors (tābiʿūn) who came to al-Andalus would do in Saragossa and Madīnat Ilbīra (Granada).Footnote 56 Other special places in al-Andalus lead us to the sphere of mirabilia, to the association of al-Andalus with legends about Solomon and Alexander the Great. All of them are of great interest and have been much studied, but they mostly tell us how al-Andalus was imagined by outsiders, especially in Egypt.Footnote 57 For the period considered here, we may recall the case of the so-called idol of Cádiz. The Umayyad emir Muḥammad is said to have left Cordoba to hunt until he reached the region of Cádiz. They planted tents around the idol (ṣanam) that stood there, an idol that was connected with ancestral wisdom (lahu sha'n fī l-ḥikma). The emir contemplated the monument for a long time, walked around it and finally decided to use fire to check how solid it was and what it was made of. He ordered the people of the place to gather wood and pile it up around the idol. The accumulated wood reached the height of the statue situated on top of the monument, representing a man pointing with one hand and holding a key in the other. The emir ordered the fire lit, but then a wind came from the statue that extinguished the fire but blew the embers onto the royal tents, burning many of them. The emir and his retinue, terrified by what they had seen, mounted their horses and rode away.Footnote 58
This report associating the idol of Cádiz with some supernatural acts would allow us to include it in a repertoire of sacred or holy places in al-Andalus, but we are still left with a reduced number of sites in a “sacred” geography (one or two mosques, two or three graves, an idol, a tree…). More importantly, the sources at our disposal tell us nothing of how the common people attached holiness to the places where they lived – if they did. An ethnographic perspective is almost completely missing for this early period.
This view changes somewhat if we move from the common people to the rulers. At the time of the disintegration of Umayyad rule, members of the Prophet's House, the Ḥammūdids, were proclaimed as caliphs and managed to control most of the area of the Straits of Gibraltar. Some of the coins they minted show a fish that has been explained as evoking the story of Moses and al-Khiḍr that is associated with the merging of two seas and therefore would impress a sacred history onto that region.Footnote 59
Before the Ḥammūdid rise to power, the third Umayyad Cordoban caliph Hishām II attempted to overcome his deficit in legitimacy – he had succeeded his father al-Ḥakam II when he was a minor – and to counteract the claims to sacred power on the part of his dangerous rivals, the Ismaili Fatimids established in Ifrīqiya. He did so by collecting relics associated with pre-Islamic prophets: Noah's ark, the horns of Isaac's ram, the hoofs of ʿUzayr's ass, the legs of Ṣāliḥ’s she-camel.Footnote 60 This activity – which for the East, Rubin sees as linked to the Umayyads’ concern to establish a connection between themselves and the line of pre-Islamic ProphetsFootnote 61 – had been started by his father's construction of the new minbar of the Cordoban mosque, made to evoke the minbar of the Prophet treated as a relic, thus becoming a relic itself.Footnote 62 Of Hishām it is also reported that once he had sexual relations with an extremely beautiful slave that he owned and found her not to be a virgin as he had expected. When he demanded an explanation, the slave girl answered that one day she fell asleep under a certain tree in the garden where they now found themselves. She told the caliph: “Someone whose mention may God keep removed from this place (wa-idhā bi-man nazzaha Allāh dhikrahuʿan hādhā l-makān)Footnote 63 had sexual intercourse with me and deflowered me while I slept.” When she awoke she found blood between her legs and because she was afraid of the dishonour involved, she kept silent. The caliph wept when she finished the story, moved by the fact that God had considered him worthy of sending someone to his garden to deflower his slave girl. He manumitted the slave and ordered an oratory (rābiṭa) to be built in the garden where the intimate encounter had taken place in order to benefit from its baraka.Footnote 64 This story has to be related to Hishām II's fateful accession to the throne as a minor, which allowed the rise of the powerful minister Ibn Abī ʿĀmir (Almanzor) and his attainment of effective rule over al-Andalus. Ibn Abī ʿĀmir's descendant ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Sanchuelo convinced the Umayyad caliph to name him as his successor, thus opening the door to the civil wars that would eventually lead to the abolition of the Umayyad caliphate. That Hishām II could believe the story told by the slave girl clearly demonstrated that he was unfit to stop the destruction of the Cordoban Umayyad dynasty. We have here another representation of Hishām II as a simpletonFootnote 65 and a gullible person: he is called “retarded” (al-mutakhallif) for having been so credulous as to transform the site where the miraculous loss of virginity had allegedly taken place into a shrine. But even if this story was invented to emphasize the unworthiness of the Umayyad, who was unable to ensure the survival of the dynasty he was in charge of defending, it suggests the awareness that unusual events could give birth to holy places. We are tempted to extrapolate from it that such a reaction was an event common enough to be lampooned.
By way of conclusion, during the Almohad period there is clear evidence of an urge to record the existence of holy Islamic places in al-Andalus, some of which were linked to the Umayyad past. No similar interest existed during the first three centuries of Muslim rule in the Iberian Peninsula: to judge from the extant sources one might conclude that there were almost no holy places in Umayyad al-Andalus. Does this silence reflect reality or create it? On the one hand, Christians in Umayyad times constituted the majority of the population and thus most holy places must have reflected their beliefs and practices, of no interest for Muslim authors except when some Muslims visited them. On the other hand, the development of local Muslim holy places can be traced through the prism of its control on the part of a well-developed and structured legal establishment devoted to ensure that practices and doctrines adhered to Maliki norms of proper religious behaviour and belief, as exemplified by Ibn Waḍḍāḥ's writings. Were such efforts that concentrated on censorship and condemnation successful in controlling and reducing the appearance of local Muslim holy places? Some degree of success could have been obtained in the urban centres that counted a noticeable number of religious scholars, but that was not the case with the major part of the territory.Footnote 66 There, places considered to be holy by the local Muslim population could have developed, leaving no written trace unless an unconventional scholar like Ibn Hazm took care to record that which was left unnoticed by the rest.Footnote 67 After all, what we know about Umayyad al-Andalus is largely the representation modelled by its scholarly establishment and in such representation – “orthodox” al-Andalus against the heresies and innovations that plagued the ʿAbbāsid East and the Ismaili Ifriqiya – holy places could hardly be acknowledged.