Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:06:45.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Importance of determining the climatic domains of sheep breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

D. Petit*
Affiliation:
UMR 1061, Université de Limoges, 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France
I. Boujenane
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, PO Box 6202 Rabat-Instituts, 10101 Rabat, Morocco

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to compare the capacity of the major sheep breeds in Morocco to cope with climate changes through the ranges of several climate parameters in which they can be found. We first delimitated the climatic ‘domains’ of each breed by constructing a database including altitude and climatic parameters (minima mean of the coldest month, maxima mean of the hottest month, annual rainfall, pluviothermic coefficient of Emberger Q2, annual minima mean and annual maxima mean) on a 30-year period using the representative stations of each breed distribution. The overlap between each breed combination was quantified through a canonical analysis that extracted the most discriminant parameters. The variance analysis of each climatic parameter evidenced two breeds remarkable by their tolerance. The first one is the Timahdite, mainly settled in areas over 1100 m, which can tolerate the greatest variations in annual rainfall and pluviothermic coefficient. In spite of this feature, this breed is endangered owing to the decreasing quality of pastures. The second one is the D’man which apparently can support high variations in extreme temperatures. In fact, this breed is not well adapted to pastures and requires a special microclimate offered by oases. The information reported in this study will be the basis for the establishment of characterization and selection strategies for Moroccan sheep.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1 Number of climatic stations for the periods 1933 to 1963 and 1983 to 2013 for each sheep breed

Figure 1

Figure 1 Emberger’s pluviothermic diagrams of the geographic areas of the six sheep breeds. 0 and + relate to the minimum and maximum probabilities of presence in the climatic gradients. s=Saharian stage, a=arid stage, sa=semi-arid stage, sh=sub-humid stage; +=area of maximum values.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Mahalanobis distances between climatic space of the six sheep breeds. BA=Béni Ahsen; BG=Béni Guil; BJ=Boujaâd; DM=D’man; SA=Sardi; TM=Timahdite.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Representation of canonical analysis of climatic space of the six sheep breeds. BA=Béni Ahsen; BG=Béni Guil; BJ=Boujaâd; DM=D’man; SA=Sardi; TM=Timahdite.

Figure 4

Table 2 Percentages of climatic stations (in column) classified in the own geographic areas (in line) of the six sheep breeds (1983 to 2013 period), obtained by discriminant analysis

Figure 5

Figure 4 Variances of climatic parameters for each sheep breed for the period 1983 to 2013. The different letters correspond to significant differences (P<0.05).

Figure 6

Table 3 Variances of climatic parameters in the different geographic areas of the six sheep breeds

Figure 7

Table 4 Variation in the climatic parameters between the periods 1933 to 1962 and 1983 to 2013 of the six sheep breeds