Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T05:26:41.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of a mixture theory to stress waves in snow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George E. Austiguy Jr.
Affiliation:
Brian Way, Boise, ID 83712, U.S.A.
Robert L. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A continuum theory of mixtures is applied to model snow as a mixture of an elastic solid and an elastic fluid. Three wave types, two dilational and one rotational, are shown to exist. Numerical evaluation shows velocity and attenuation increasing with frequency for all three waves. Wave velocity increases with increasing density while attenuation decreases with increasing density for all three waves. The first dilational wave is associated with the pore fluid, has a slow wave speed and is highly attenuated. This wave exhibits diffusive behavior at low frequencies and nondispersive behavior at high frequencies. The second dilation wave is associated with the solid ice material. It is the fastest of the three wave types and does not appreciably attenuate. Nondispersive wave behavior characterizes this wave at low and high frequencies. The rotational wave occurs only in the solid, is the least attenuated of all three waves, and propagates at velocities greater than that of the first, but less than that of the second, dilational wave. The rotational wave exhibits nondispersive behavior at low and high frequencies. Wave velocities and attenuation show behavior that is in agreement with existing experimental data.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1993
Figure 0

Table 1.Values for material constants at −5°C

Figure 1

Table 2.Values for physical constants at −5°C

Figure 2

Table 3.Values for material constants of solid phase at −5°C

Figure 3

Fig.1 .Experimental and theoretical propagation velocities.

Figure 4

Fig.2 .Propagation velocity for the first dilation mode, a, in the low-frequency regime; b, in the high-frequency regime.

Figure 5

Fig.3 .Attenuation coefficient for the first dilation mode. a, in the low-frequency regime; b, in the high-frequency regime.

Figure 6

Fig.4 .Attenuation coefficient for the second dilation mode. a, in the low-frequency regime; b, in the high-frequency regime.

Figure 7

Fig.5 .Attenuation coefficient for the shear wave, a, in the low-frequency regime; b, in the high-frequency regime.

Figure 8

Fig.6 .Normalized amplitude attenuation for the two dilation waves with density of 410kgm−3.

Figure 9

Fig.7 .Normalized amplitude attenuation for the shear wave with density of 410kgm−3.