Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:38:28.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

KTP laser therapy for refractory chronic myringitis: a case series and comparative outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2025

Justin Tze Tao Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, China
Sung Him Herbert Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, China
Hilary Hil Ching Kwok
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, China
Cynthia Ka Cheong Wai
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, China
*
Corresponding author: Sung Him Herbert Lee; Email: herbertshlee@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate) laser therapy and dextracin ear drops for treatment of chronic myringitis.

Methods

A case series involving 31 patients (18 laser group; 13 dextracin group). Primary outcomes included otorrhoea resolution, improvement in Chronic Ear Survey scores and endoscopic resolution. Secondary outcomes included hearing outcome and complications. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed-rank and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

The laser group had a higher rate of otorrhoea resolution 66.67 per cent (n = 12) vs 15.38 per cent (n = 2) (p = 0.006), showed significant improvement in symptom scores (median 31.43; p = 0.005) and medical resource use (16.67; p < 0.001) and had a significant myringitis area reduction of 31.84 per cent (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in Chronic Ear Survey scores and area reduction in the dextracin group. One laser-group patient developed a permanent perforation.

Conclusion

KTP laser therapy is effective for refractory chronic myringitis, offering superior symptom relief and reduced healthcare utilisation compared to topical treatment.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Area calculation using Adobe Photoshop lasso tool.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Set up.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Total Chronic Ear Survey (CES) score box plot.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Chronic Ear Survey (CES) symptoms score box plot.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Chronic Ear Survey (CES) medical resource score box plot.

Figure 5

Table 1. Outcomes

Figure 6

Figure 6. Myringitis area box plot.

Figure 7

Table 2. Demographics

Figure 8

Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression

Figure 9

Table 4. CES scores

Figure 10

Table 5. Endoscopic photo

Figure 11

Table 6. Hearing outcomes