Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T09:25:38.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substitution of various agricultural by-products improves fermentation profile and in vitro digestibility of rice straw silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2022

Sifan Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
Junfeng Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
Zhihao Dong
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
Jian Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Jie Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
Siran Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
Yushan Jia
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
Tao Shao*
Affiliation:
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Author for correspondence: Tao Shao, E-mail: taoshaolan@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of substituting rice straw with citrus pulp (CRP), sweet potato peels (SPP) and vines (SPV) on fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility when ensiled with or without wet brewers' grains (WBG). Seven treatments were set as follows: (i) rice straw only (control); (ii) 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g CRP/kg (RC); (iii) 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g CRP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg (RC+); (iv) 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPP/kg (RP); (v) 720 g rice straw + 180 g SPP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg (RP+); (vi) 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPV/kg (RV); (vii) 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g SPV/kg + 100 g WBG/kg (RV+). After ensiling for 3, 7, 14, 30 and 60 days, silos were opened for fermentation profile, aerobic stability and in vitro parameter analyses. All substitution types improved fermentation quality, characterized by significantly lower pH and NH3-N content, higher lactic acid content and V-scores. WBG application promoted hetero-fermentation and significantly increased DM losses, acetic acid and ethanol contents. After 60 days of ensiling, the NDF, ADF and cellulose contents in mixed silages significantly decreased compared to control. During aerobic exposure, WBG application significantly prolonged aerobic stability. SPV substitution significantly improved in vitro digestibility of dry matter, NDF and ADF. In conclusion, the SPP substitution combined with WBG application was recommended as a result of the optimal balance of fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility.

Information

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of raw materials

Figure 1

Table 2. Chemical and microbial composition of mixtures before ensiling

Figure 2

Table 3. Dynamics of DM loss, WSC, NH3-N and ethanol contents during ensiling

Figure 3

Table 4. Dynamics of pH, lactic acid and volatile fatty acids contents during ensiling

Figure 4

Fig. 1. The cumulative in vitro gas production of rice straw silages ensiled with or without WBG. Treatments: control: rice straw alone; RC: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g CRP/kg; RC+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g CRP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg; RP: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPP/kg; RP+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g SPP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg; RV: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPV/kg; RV+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g SPV/kg + 100 g WBG/kg. S, the effect of substitution types; W, the effect of WBG application; S × W, two-way interaction between main factors.

Figure 5

Table 5. Chemical composition and in vitro parameters of silages after 60 days of ensiling

Figure 6

Fig. 2. The aerobic stability and V-scores of rice straw silages. Treatments: control: control: rice straw alone; RC: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g CRP/kg; RC+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g CRP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg; RP: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPP/kg; RP+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g SPP/kg + 100 g WBG/kg; RV: 800 g rice straw/kg + 200 g SPV/kg; RV+: 720 g rice straw/kg + 180 g SPV/kg + 100 g WBG/kg. A–EMeans within aerobic stability with different capital letters are statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). a–eMeans within V-scores with different lowcase are statistically significantly different (P < 0.05).