Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T18:03:45.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting iron ore sinter strength through partial least square regression (PLSR) analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Nathan A.S. Webster*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC, 3169, Australia
Mark I. Pownceby
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC, 3169, Australia
Natalie Ware
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, PO Box 883, Kenmore, QLD, 4069, Australia
Rachel Pattel
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC, 3169, Australia
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: nathan.webster@csiro.au

Abstract

The decrease in quality of Australian iron ore, coupled with the demand for more efficient energy use, means that closer monitoring and optimisation of process conditions for iron ore sinter production is required. Here, the suitability of using partial least-squares regression analysis of powder X-ray diffraction data, collected for iron ore sinter samples, for the prediction of iron ore sinter strength has been further assessed. In addition, a preliminary assessment of the effect of 2θ range on the quality of prediction has been made. For the purposes of process control, the level of correlation between predicted strength and actual sinter strength would inform an operator whether or not the process was operating within the acceptable limits, or whether there was a potential problem requiring further investigation or rapid intervention. Reducing the 2θ range was found to reduce the level of correlation between predicted and actual strength, to a point where the particular analysis may no longer be suitable for process control.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (Color online) XRD patterns collected for sinter samples prepared from iron ore samples with varying bulk composition, with total Fe content expressed as wt% Fe2O3.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (Color online) (a) Optimisation plot in HighScore Plus showing two tested scaling modes, the number of factors used and the RMSEP (root-mean-square error of prediction) for a calibration set of compact sinter samples/XRD patterns, and (b) the PLSR fit to the calibration data.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (Color online) Plots of calculated vs. measured tumble index (TI) values for a series of compact sinter test samples. In (b) correlation coefficient (R2) = 0.87. The dashed line in (b) is not a line of best fit, it is simply a line showing where prediction = correlation. The error bars on the measured TI values show ± standard deviation of repeat measurements.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (Color online) XRD patterns collected for sinter samples with TI = 80.5 (lower) and 80.3 (upper). Here, patterns have been offset in the intensity axis for clarity.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (Color online) Plots of calculated vs. measured tumble index (TI) values for the compact sinter test samples, with the upper 2θ angle in the XRD datasets cropped at 55°. In (b) R2 = 0.77.