Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:21:42.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematics and molecular phylogeny of two African stem borer genera, Sciomesa Tams & Bowden and Carelis Bowden (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2010

P. Moyal*
Affiliation:
IRD/CNRS-Laboratoire Evolution Génomes Spéciation, Avenue de la terrasse, B.P. 1, 91198Gif-sur-Yvette cedex-France
B. Le Ru
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherche IRD 072, ICIPE, PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Conlong
Affiliation:
South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Private Bag X02, Mount Edgecombe, 4300South Africa School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
D. Cugala
Affiliation:
Eduardo Mondlane University, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Av. J. Nyerere, Campus Universitario 1, Maputo, Moçambique
B. Defabachew
Affiliation:
Ethiopian Agricultural Research Centre, Melkasa, PO Box 436, Ethiopia
T. Matama-Kauma
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO), Namulonge Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda
B. Pallangyo
Affiliation:
Biocontrol Programme, PO Box 30031, Kibaha, Tanzania
J. Van den Berg
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North West University (Potchefstroom Campus), Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +33 1 67 82 37 36 E-mail: pascal.moyal@ird.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Currently, the systematics of the African noctuid stem borers of the subtribe Sesamiina, which include major pests of cereals, is confused. In addition, their ecology is poorly known, as are the factors influencing their evolution. In this paper, we address these shortcomings for two genera of the Sesamiina, Sciomesa Tams & Bowden and Carelis Bowden. Mixed Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, which included their host plants and two mitochondrial genes, showed the genus Sciomesa to be polyphyletic. Two new genera were created, Pirateolea and Feraxinia. The genus Carelis proved to be paraphyletic and was subdivided into two sub-genera. The genera Sciomesa, Carelis and Pirateolea (named the ‘Sciomesa genus group’) share morphological traits, and the phylogenetic analysis showed that they had a common ancestor living on Cyperaceae and that they were distant from the genus Feraxinia belonging to another clade which had an ancestor living on Poaceae. Seven new species were described: Sciomesa gnosia sp. n., Sciomesia bua sp. n., Pirateolea nola gen. n, sp. n., Feraxinia serena gen. n., sp. n., Carelis australis sp. n., Carelis transversa sp. n. and Carelis agnae sp. n. Ten species were sunk as synonyms: Sciomesa mesoscia (Hampson) syn. n., Sciomesa mirifica Laporte syn. n., Sciomesa constantini Laporte syn. n. and Sciomesa etchecopari Laporte syn. n. are synonyms of Sciomesa mesophaea (Aurivillius); Acrapex sparsipucta Laporte syn. n. is a synonym of Sciomesa excelsa (Laporte) comb. n.; Acrapex congitae Laporte syn. n., Sesamia minuta Laporte syn. n. and Sesamia minuscula Laporte syn. n. are synonyms of Sciomesa boulardi (Laporte) comb. n.; Acrapex bryae Laporte syn. n. and Acrapex fayei Laporte syn. n. are synonyms of Feraxinia jemjemensis (Laporte) comb. n. Eleven new combinations were created: Sciomesa excelsa (Laporte) comb. n., Sciomesa boulardi (Laporte) comb. n., Sciomesa punctipennis (Krüger) comb. n., Pirateolea piscator (Fletcher) comb. n., Pirateolea argocyma (Fletcher) comb. n., Pirateolea cyclophora (Fletcher) comb. n., Pirateolea ochroneura (Fletcher) comb. n., Pirateolea funebris (Krüger) comb. n., Feraxinia nyei (Fletcher) comb. n., Feraxinia jemjemensis (Laporte) comb. n. and Carelis biluma (Nye) comb. n.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Table 1. Genbank accession numbers.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree resulting from Bayesian analysis of the mixed data set including two mitochondrial genes, Cytochrome b and Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, and host plants. Numbers below branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers above squares indicate the posterior probability of the host plant ancestral state shown in the squares. The new genus names are used. Species in bold cases were included until now in the genus Sciomesa (□, Poaceae; ▪, Cyperaceae; , Typhaceae; , Juncaceae).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree resulting from Bayesian analysis of the Cytochrome b gene alone, with the geographic origin of the specimens. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Sciomesa gnosia sp. n. male adult.Fig. 4.Sciomesa gnosia sp. n. female adult.Fig. 5. Sciomesa bua sp. n. male adult.Fig. 6. Pirateolea nola sp. n. male adult.Fig. 7. Pirateolea nola sp. n. female adult.Fig. 8. Feraxinia serena sp. n. male adult.Fig. 9. Feraxinia serena sp. n. female adult.Fig. 10. Carelis australis sp. n. male adult.Fig. 11. Carelis australis sp. n. female adult.Fig. 12. Carelis transversa sp. n. male adult.Fig. 13. Carelis transversa sp. n. female adult.Fig. 14. Carelis agnae sp. n. male adult.Fig. 15. Carelis agnae sp. n. female adult.

Figure 4

Table 2. Genus Sciomesa: taxonomic and ecological data.

Figure 5

Table 3. Genus Pirateolea: taxonomic and ecological data.

Figure 6

Table 4. genus Feraxinia: taxonomic and ecological data.

Figure 7

Fig. 16. Sciomesa gnosia sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 17. Sciomesa bua sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 18. Pirateolea nola sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 19. Feraxinia serena sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 20. Carelis australis sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 21. Carelis transversa sp. n. male genitalia.Fig. 22. Carelis agnae sp. n. male genitalia.

Figure 8

Fig. 23. Sciomesa gnosia sp. n. female genitalia.Fig. 24. Pirateolea nola sp. n. female genitalia.Fig. 25. Feraxinia serena sp. n. female genitalia.Fig. 26. Carelis australis sp. n.female genitalia.Fig. 27. Carelis transversa sp. n. female genitalia.Fig. 28. Carelis agnae sp. n.female genitalia.

Figure 9

Table 5. genus Carelis: taxonomic and ecological data.

Figure 10

Fig. 29. Larva of Sciomesa mesophaea.Fig. 30. Larva of Sciomesa gnosia sp. n.Fig. 31. Larva of Sciomesa scotochroa.Fig. 32. Larva of Pirateolea piscator comb. n.Fig. 33. Larva of Pirateolea nola sp. n.Fig. 34. Larva of Carelis transversa sp. n.Fig. 35. Larva of Carelis agnae sp. n.Fig. 36. Larva of Carelis biluma comb. n.Fig. 37. Larva of Feraxinia nyei comb. n.Fig. 38. Larva of Feraxinia serena sp. n.