Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:17:29.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triple band circularly polarized compact microstrip antenna with defected ground structure for wireless applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2015

Mukesh Kumar Khandelwal
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, I.S.M, Dhanbad-826004, India. Phone: +91 11 22048047
Binod Kumar Kanaujia*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Ambedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research, Delhi-110031, India
Santanu Dwari
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, I.S.M, Dhanbad-826004, India. Phone: +91 11 22048047
Sachin Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Ambedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research, Delhi-110031, India
Anil Kumar Gautam
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, G. B. Pant Engineering College, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand-246194, India
*
Corresponding author: B. K. Kanaujia Email: bkkanaujia@ieee.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Asymmetric slits loaded irregular shaped microstrip patch antenna with three different ground structures is proposed. All three antennas show triple band characteristics. First antenna with regular ground plane resonates at 1.95, 2.4, and 4.90 GHz with good radiation characteristics and shows right-hand circular polarization at 1.95 GHz. 18.75% of compactness is achieved with triple band characteristics. Further, same patch is used with different defected ground structures. Second antenna resonates at 1.85, 2.4, and 4.85 GHz with suppressed cross-polarization level and antenna shows right-hand circular polarization at 1.85 and 4.85 GHz. Compactness is further improved to the value of 22.91%. The third antenna resonates at 1.95, 2.4, and 4.85 GHz with better gain and radiation characteristics and antenna shows right-hand circular polarization at 1.95 and 2.4 GHz. The small frequency ratio f2/f1 is achieved and the value of f2/f1 is 1.29 and 1.23 for second and third configuration, respectively. Proposed structures show right-hand circularly polarized with suppressed left-hand circularly polarized radiations and suitable for fixed mobile wireless communication applications. All structures are analyzed using Ansoft HFSS v.14 based on finite element method and measured results satisfy the simulated results.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Structure of the proposed antenna Ant1 (without DGS); (a) schematic, (b) top view, (c) bottom view.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Structure of the proposed antenna Ant2 (with trapezoidal shaped DGS); (a) schematic, (b) top view of fabricated Ant2, (c) bottom view of fabricated Ant2.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Structure of the proposed antenna Ant3 (with DGS); (a) schematic, (b) top view of fabricated Ant3, (c) bottom view of fabricated Ant3.

Figure 3

Table 1. Design specifications.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated and measured S11 variations with frequency of Ant1.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Simulated and measured S11 variations with frequency of Ant2.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Simulated and measured S11 variations with frequency of Ant3.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Simulated and measured Axial Ratio variations with frequency of Ant1 (without DGS).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Simulated and measured Axial Ratio variations with frequency of Ant2 (with trapezoidal shaped DGS).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured Axial Ratio variations with frequency of Ant3 (with DGS).

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Simulated and measured Antenna Gain variations with frequency of Ant1.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Simulated and measured Antenna Gain variations with frequency of Ant2.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Simulated and measured Antenna Gain variations with frequency of Ant3.

Figure 13

Table 2. Result analysis of Ant1.

Figure 14

Table 3. Result analysis of Ant2.

Figure 15

Table 4. Result analysis of Ant3.

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant1 (without DGS) at frequency 1.95 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant1 (without DGS) at frequency 4.9 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 18

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant2 (with trapezoidal shaped DGS) at frequency 1.85 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 19

Fig. 16. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant2 (with trapezoidal shaped DGS) at frequency 4.85 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 20

Fig. 17. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant3 (with DGS) at frequency 1.95 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 21

Fig. 18. Simulated and measured co-polar and cross-polar radiation pattern of Ant3 (with DGS) at frequency 4.85 GHz, (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.