Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:18:28.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Angiogenesis and parasitic helminth-associated neovascularization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

ROGER D. DENNIS*
Affiliation:
Institute for Biochemistry, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 24, 35392 Giessen, Germany
UWE SCHUBERT
Affiliation:
Institute for Biochemistry, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 24, 35392 Giessen, Germany
CHRISTIAN BAUER
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 2, 35392 Giessen, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Institute for Biochemistry, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 24, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Tel: +49 641 99 47460. Fax: +49 641 99 47509. E-mail: roger.d.dennis@googlemail.com and roger.d.dennis@biochemie.med.uni-giessen.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Successful metazoan parasitism, among many other factors, requires a supply of nutrients and the removal of waste products. There is a prerequisite for a parasite-defined vasculature. The angiogenic mechanism(s) involved presumably depend on the characteristics of the tissue- and vascular system-dwelling, parasitic helminths. Simplistically, 2 possibilities or a combination of both have been considered in this review. The multifactorial induction of parasitic helminth-associated neovascularization could arise through, either a host-, a parasite- or a host-/parasite-dependent, angiogenic switch. Most studies appear to support the first and third hypotheses, but evidence exists for the intrahepatic cestode Echinococcus multilocularis, the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the intravascular trematode Schistosoma mansoni for the second inference. In contrast, the nematode anti-coagulant protein NAPc2 from adult Ancylostoma caninum is also an anti-angiogenic factor.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Hypothesized pathway(s) of parasitic helminth-associated (lymph)angiogenesis. (A) Partition of (lymph)angiogenesis into four developmental stages: I, release of helminth- and/or upregulation of host-derived, proangiogenic factors; II, angiogenic switch of endothelial cell activation; III, remodelling events of parasite vasculature-formation; IV, maintenance of immaturity or maturation of parasite vasculature. (B) Cartoon of the four phases of (lymph)angiogenesis: I, priming of vascular or lymphatic, endothelial cells by parasitic helminth- and/or inflammatory infiltrate-generated, proangiogenic factors; II, angiogenic switch and focal breakdown of vessel-basement membrane; III, remodelling and formation of parasite-determined vasculature; IV, maintenance of immaturity or pericyte-identified maturation. ECs, vascular endothelial cells; ECM, extracellular matrix; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; LECs, lymphatic endothelial cells; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Response of endothelial cells to SEA as verified by the spheroid assay. (A) Response of BRECs to high levels of SEA (10 μg/ml): 1, negative control; 2, positive control FGF2 at 5 ng/ml; 3, intestinal SEA; 4, hepatic SEA; 5, adult worm extract. Calibration bar=500 μm. (B) Response of HUVECs to high levels of SEA (10 μg/ml): 1, negative control; 2, positive control FGF2 at 5 ng/ml; 3, intestinal SEA; 4, hepatic SEA; 5, adult worm extract. Calibration bar=500 μm. (C) Analysis in vitro of capillary total-length formation by spheroid assay at high and low levels of SEA (10 and 0·1 μg/ml). A II, adult worm extract of batch II; BRECs, bovine retinal endothelial cells; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; SEA, soluble schistosome egg antigen; SI II/IV, intestinal SEA of batches II/IV; SL III/IV, hepatic SEA of batches III/IV; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor as positive control at 100 ng/ml.