Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T07:07:59.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstrip lowpass filter with wide stopband and sharp roll-off using modified radial stub resonator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Mohsen Hayati*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Mehrnaz Khodadoost
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Hamed Abbasi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
*
Corresponding author:M. Hayati Email: mohsen_hayati@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a microstrip lowpass filter with wide stopband and sharp roll-off is presented. The proposed filter consists of a modified radial stub resonator which is cascaded by four suppressing cells. To reduce the overall size, the transmission lines are folded. The cut-off frequency of the proposed filter is 1.19 GHz. The transition band is approximately 0.2 GHz from 1.19 to 1.39 GHz with corresponding attenuation levels of 3–20 dB. The stopband is from 1.39 to 19 GHz with attenuation level of <20 dB. The insertion loss and return loss in the passband from DC to 0.8 GHz are better than 0.26 and 14 dB, respectively. The proposed filter is fabricated and measured. The simulated and measured results are in good agreement.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The geometric structure of the conventional stepped impedance resonator with its LC equivalent circuit.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) The conventional resonator. (b) The proposed resonator. (c) The frequency response of the conventional stepped impedance resonator and the proposed resonator. (d) SWF of the proposed resonator.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) The frequency response of the proposed resonator with different values of the L. (b) The frequency response of the proposed resonator with different values of the Wr.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) The prototype suppressing cells. (b) The proposed suppressing cells. (c) Equivalent circuit of the bended microstrip line. (d) The frequency response of the prototype and proposed suppressing cells.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) The proposed filter. (b) Photograph of the proposed filter. (c) Measured and simulated results of the proposed filter. (d) Group delay of the proposed filter.

Figure 5

Table 1. Performance comparison of the proposed filter with the references.