Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:32:46.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional and global right ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with congenitally corrected transposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2005

Igor I. Tulevski
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Frank M. Zijta
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Anika S. Smeijers
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ali Dodge-Khatami
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ernst E. van der Wall
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Barbara J. M. Mulder
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patients with congenitally corrected transposition are at risk of right ventricular dysfunction and failure. With this in mind, we examined 13 patients with congenitally corrected transposition, 7 not having undergone surgery, and 6 after physiological repair, comparing them with 6 healthy subjects matched for age and sex, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, at rest and during dobutamine stress, in order to determine regional and global right ventricular response to stress.

At rest, the patients had significantly decreased overall wall motion compared to their healthy peers (7.2 ± 0.5, versus 9.8 ± 0.4 mm). During infusion of dobutamine, overall wall motion increased to 12.8 ± 0.4 mm in the healthy subjects, versus 8.8 ± 1.0 mm in patients. At the regional level, significant differences in mural motion were found between patients and controls in the anterior (9.5 ± 1.1, versus 13.2 ± 0.6 mm), posterior (10.2 ± 1.6, versus 13.2 ± 0.8 mm), and septal segments (5.0 ± 0.8, versus 11.2 ± 0.6 mm).

At rest, overall mural thickening in patients was similar to that of controls, but significantly less in patients during stress. During dobutamine stress, patients showed significantly less regional wall thickening than controls, particularly in the septal (2.7 ± 0.6, versus 6.0 ± 0.4 mm, respectively) and in the anterior segments (4.2 ± 0.6, versus 7.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively). Right ventricular ejection fraction strongly correlated with mural motion and thickening, both at rest and during stress.

Abnormal regional function in the systemic morphologically right ventricle may occur in patients with congenitally corrected transposition, which strongly correlates with right ventricular ejection fraction. Our findings support the hypothesis that, in patients with congenitally corrected transposition, ischemia of the right ventricular myocardium contributes to the development of right ventricular dysfunction.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Magnetic resonance image showing a slice through the middle of the morphologically right ventricle in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition. The endocardial (red) and epicardial (green) contours are shown, along with 100 centerline (yellow) cords of the systemic ventricle. ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition.

Figure 1

Table 1.

Figure 2

Differences in mural thickening are shown (a) between patients with congenitally corrected transposition (black bars) and healthy controls (white bars) at rest in septal, anterior, lateral and posterior segments. ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition; ns: not significant. (b) Shows the situation during dobutamine stress testing.

Figure 3

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the morphologically right ventricle from a patient with congenitally corrected transposition (left and middle) and the heart of a healthy control (right). Red: volume of the systemic ventricle; green: epicardium; yellow: right ventricle of a healthy control.

Figure 4

Graphic showing the linear correlation between mural motion and ejection fraction at rest. The 95% confidence limits of the true regression line are indicated with dashes lines. (a) Shows the results for patients with congenitally corrected transposition, while (b) shows the situation in the normal right ventricle. RVEF: right ventricular ejection fraction; r: correlation coefficient.