Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:52:54.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pure colors from core–shell quantum dots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2013

Ou Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;chenou@mit.edu
He Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;hewei@mit.edu
Axel Maurice
Affiliation:
CEA Grenoble, France;axel.maurice@cea.fr
Moungi Bawendi
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology;mgb@mit.edu
Peter Reiss
Affiliation:
CEA Grenoble, France;peter.reiss@cea.fr

Abstract

Emissive saturated colors are key components of new generations of lighting and display technologies. Quantum dots have evolved in the past two decades to fulfill many of the requirements of color purity, stability, and efficiency that are critical to transitioning these materials from the laboratory into these markets. A fundamental feature of quantum dots is the tunability of their emission color through precise control of their size and composition, giving access to UV, visible, and near-infrared wavelengths. Continuing improvements in engineering core–shell quantum dot structures, where a 1–10 nm binary, ternary, or alloyed semiconductor core particle is surrounded by a shell composed of one or more semiconductors of a wider bandgap, have resulted in materials with fluorescence quantum yields that approach unity, narrow symmetric spectral line shapes, and remarkable stabilities. In this article, we review progress in the development of highly luminescent core–shell quantum dots of different semiconductor families in view of their integration in light-emitting applications. CdSe-based quantum dots already fulfill many of the requirements of lighting and display applications in terms of fluorescence quantum yield, color purity, and stability.

Information

Type
Quantum dot light-emitting devices
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Reported spectral ranges of emission for different semiconductor quantum dots. Reprinted with permission from Reference 7. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Photograph of emissive CdS- and CdSe-based core–shell quantum dot solutions under UV light.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Temporal evolution of (a) photoluminescence (PL), (b) absorption, and (c) PL quantum yields (QYs). The green square shows the original PL QY of CdSe quantum dots (QDs) and (d) FWHM of the PL peak of CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs during shell growth reaction. Transmission electron microscopy images of (e) 4.4 nm CdSe core and (f–h) CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs with a CdS shell thickness of 0.8 nm, 1.6 nm, and 2.4 nm, respectively. Scale bar is 50 nm. (i) Representative PL blinking trace of a single CdSe/CdS core–shell QD. The histogram shows the distribution of intensities observed in the trace. (j) Histogram of the blinking “on” time fraction. The average “on” time fraction is 0.94. (k) The normalized (Nor.) PL intensity trace obtained from a collection of QDs. The inset shows the Nor. PL intensity trace obtained from a collection of QDs synthesized through the conventional method. Reprinted with permission from Reference 6. © 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Cd3P2 quantum dots (QDs) with different sizes: (a) 2.5, (b) 4.0, and (c) 12 nm. High resolution (HR) TEM image of (d) Cd3P2 QDs (sample in (c)). Scale bar is 50 nm for TEM and 10 nm for HRTEM. (e) Photoluminescence spectra of Cd3P2 QDs with various sizes. (i) <1.5, (ii) <1.5, (iii) 1.5, (iv) 1.8, (v) 2.4, (vi) 3, (vii) 4, (viii) 5.5, and (ix) 7.6 nm. (f) Relation between the size of Cd3P2 QDs and their emission peak positions. Reprinted with permission from Reference 50. © 2010 American Chemical Society.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Single-step one-pot synthesis of InPZnS quantum dots. (a) Evolution of the photoluminescence (PL) (λex 400 nm) and absorption spectra with reaction time (vertically shifted for clarity). (b) Photograph of samples obtained using the indicated reaction times under UV light. (c) Evolution of the fluorescence quantum yield and of the PL line width (increasing reaction time from left to right). Reproduced with permission from Reference 60. © 2008 American Chemical Society.