Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T03:26:49.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tidewater glacier fluctuations in central East Greenland coastal and fjord regions (1980s–2005)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Hester Jiskoot
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada E-mail: hester.jiskoot@uleth.ca
Dan Juhlin
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada E-mail: hester.jiskoot@uleth.ca
Heather St Pierre
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada E-mail: hester.jiskoot@uleth.ca
Michele Citterio
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Geology and Glaciology, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Summer 2000/01 ASTER and Landsat 7 scenes and semi-automated digitization were used to compile a glacier inventory for local glaciers of the Geikie Plateau region, central East Greenland. Of the 332 glaciers (41 591 km2), 120 are tidewater-terminating and drain 90% of the glacierized area. Differencing the 2000/01 tidewater margins from the 1980s GEUS map database ice polygons (113 glaciers) and from 2004/05 ASTER tidewater margins (78 glaciers) shows a cumulative tidewater terminus width decrease from 196 km to 183 km between the 1980s and 2000s, with a corresponding areal loss of ~31 km2 and an effective length change of –14.3 km. Between 2000/01 and 2004/05, areal loss was 26 km2. Average margin retreat rate increased two- to threefold, from 1.7–2.1km2 a–1 (1980s– 2000) to 3.9–5.7km2 a–1 (2000–05). Advances are negligible, apart from two surges, of which one was previously undetected. Coastal, ‘outer’ fjord-terminating, glaciers have two to three times larger areal and effective length retreat rates than ‘inner’ fjord-terminating glaciers. We investigate possible causes and hypothesize that, in addition to ocean temperature and sea ice, changes in sea fog may affect coastal-terminating more than inner fjord-terminating glaciers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Study region map with glacier outlines of land-terminating (dark blue) and tidewater-terminating glaciers (light blue) and 2000/01 tidewater margins (red). The outline of the Greenland ice sheet (grey) is approximate and based on Weidick (1995). K = Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier; A = Aputiteeq; I = Ittoqqortoomiit.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Tidewater margin changes of (a) unnamed complex in Kivioq Fjord (‘Rosenborg Basin’), (b) Kong Christian IV Gletscher, (c) Sortebræ and (d) Borggraven. See Figure 4 for locations. The yellow line is the glacier polygon from the Landsat 7 mosaic of 2000/01. Margin lines are from GEUS map polygons of the 1980s (orange) and ASTER scenes from 2000 (purple) and 2005 (green). Coloured circles correspond to areal retreat or advance between the 1980s and 2000 (Fig. 3a). Backgrounds are 2005 ASTER scenes.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Tidewater margin area changes for (a) 1980s–2000/01 and (b) 2000/01–04/05. Tidewater margin changes indicated with circles. Colours represent direction (red = retreat, green = advance, yellow = no significant change) and circle size represents magnitude of change.

Figure 3

Table 1.Terminus fluctuations of 16 fjord systems and 11 of the largest non-confluent tidewater glaciers. Glacier names in italic are unofficial. See Figure 4 for locations. Retreat is the areal retreat (negative) or advance (positive) over the time period indicated. Leff rate is the yearly rate of change in effective length (area divided by tidewater margin width). SUM tallies glaciers with measurements over both time periods (asterisked SUM values exclude Sortebræ). Glaciers are sorted from maximum retreat to maximum advance in the 1980s– 2000s period

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Effective length rate of change between the 1980s and 2000/01 for 16 fjord systems and 11 of the largest single glaciers. Names correspond to those in Table 1 and throughout the text.

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Box plots of 1980s–2000s change in tidewater margin for different classes of (a) glacier type, (b) surge type (ST), (c) fjord location and (d) fjord shape away from glacier margin. Kong Christian IV Gletscher is omitted.