Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T17:41:58.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vivaldi antennas: a historical review and current state of art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2020

Anindita Bhattacharjee
Affiliation:
Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Tripura University (A Central University), Tripura, India
Abhirup Bhawal
Affiliation:
Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Tripura University (A Central University), Tripura, India
Anirban Karmakar*
Affiliation:
Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Tripura University (A Central University), Tripura, India
Anuradha Saha
Affiliation:
Netaji Subhash Engineering College, Garia, Kolkata, India
Diptendu Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
CSE Department, NIT, Agartala, India
*
Author for correspondence: Anirban Karmakar, E-mail: anirban.ece@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The progressions in the field of wireless technology can be highly attributed to the development of antennas, which can access high data rates, provide significant gain and uniform radiation characteristics. One such antenna called the Vivaldi antenna has attracted the utmost attention of the researchers owing to its high gain, wide bandwidth, low cross-polarization, and stable radiation characteristics. Over the years, different procedures have been proposed by several researchers to improve the performance of the Vivaldi antennas. Some of these different approaches are feeding mechanisms, integration of slots, dielectric substrate selection, and radiator shape. Correspondingly, the performance of a Vivaldi antenna can be increased by including dielectric lens, parasitic patch in between two radiators, corrugations, as well as metamaterials. This paper gives a systematic identification, location, and analysis of a large number of performance enhancement methods of Vivaldi antenna design depicting their concepts, advantages, drawbacks, and applications. The principal emphasis of this article is to offer an outline of the developments in the design of Vivaldi antennas over the last few years, where the most important offerings, mostly from IEEE publications, have been emphasized. This review work aims to reveal a promising path to antenna researchers for its advancement using Vivaldi antennas.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. 8–40 GHz Video Receiver Module shows a video receiver module operates in the range of 8–40 GHz [1].

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Transition from microstrip to symmetric slot line and Vivaldi antenna [3].

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Schematic of an antipodal TSA using balun transformer as feed with W = D + 8, D = 2R1 + E, L = 2R2 + ls + lp + lt + lm + 4, R1 = 68, R2 = 1.3R1, E = 2R1 + 2, r1 = 43.2, r2 = 27, (x1, y1) = (2.975, 60), (x2, y2) = (12, 110), (x3, y3) = (69, 126.6), ls = 66.6, lp = 10, lt = 42.5, lm = 7.5, wp = 5.95, wm = 4.65, wgp = 60, gt = 8 (all parameters are in mm) [8].

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Two-stage quarter-wave balun with l1 = 26.7 mm, l2 = l3 = 11.7 mm, l4 = 17.2 mm, w1 = 1.65 mm, r1 = 7.1 mm, r2 = 6.7 mm. (a) Detailed geometry of balun. (b) Front/back view of the antenna [20].

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Schematic representation of co-polarized and cross-polarized components of the electric field vector in AVA and BAVA [30].

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Structure of balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna (BAVA) [27].

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Effect of balanced AVA. (a) Front view, (b) back view, (c) beam squint, (d) side lobe level (SLL) [29].

Figure 7

Table 1. Comparison of balanced antipodal Vivaldi antennas

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Vivaldi antenna used in UWB application [33] with w0 = 0.675 mm, r0 = 11.6 mm, l = 40 mm, w = 24 mm, d = 20 mm, (x0, y0) = (16.559, 25.8), s = 0.9 mm, ls = 13.7 mm.

Figure 9

Table 2. Comparison of different Vivaldi antennas used in wideband application

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Simulation setup and transfer function for Vivaldi antenna. (a) Tx/Rx setup, (b) magnitude of S21, (c) group delay [41].

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Transmitted and received signals in Tx/Rx setup [41].

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Measured gain in end-fire direction and group delay [6].

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Measured group delay [7].

Figure 14

Fig. 13. (a) Phase response of the fabricated FR4 antenna. (b) Group delay of the fabricated antenna [40].

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Simulated transmitted pulse and received pulse on the E-field probe at the far-field of the antipodal TSA [8].

Figure 16

Fig. 15. Steps for construction of conventional Koch curve geometry [42].

Figure 17

Fig. 16. Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with fractal structure. (a) Antenna structure with a = 4.03 mm, b = 11.17 mm, c = 18.15 mm, d = 23.02 mm, e = 59.81 mm, f = 7.00 mm, g = 9.97 mm, h = 1.00 mm, i = 1.00 mm, r = 13.12 mm, w1 = 36.30 mm, w2 = 21.35 mm. (b) Current distribution [43].

Figure 18

Fig. 17. (a) Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with a fern-inspired fractal structure with Lsub × Wsub = 50.8 × 62 × 0.8  mm3. (b) Gain improvement using fractal structure [10].

Figure 19

Table 3. Comparison of different fractal-based Vivaldi antennas

Figure 20

Fig. 18. Antipodal Vivaldi antenna for imaging application. (a) Antenna structure with LSUB = 60 mm, WSUB = 40 mm, LR = 30 mm, BG = 6.80808 mm, Lf = 10 mm, < ddollar > <ddollar > ER = 19.405 mm, WA = 22.84 mm, LL = 30 mm, Wf = 1.19 mm, d = 78.71°, Ws1 = 0.8 mm, Ls1 = 9 mm, Ws2 = 0.6 mm, Ls2 = 9.8621 mm, Ws3 = 0.6 mm, Ls3 = 2.84615 mm, (b) electric field distribution, (c) gain characteristics [45].

Figure 21

Fig. 19. Proposed antenna test the concrete beam: (a) top and side view; holographic slices of 3D images: (b) the top of insert, (c) 9 mm below the top insert, (d) 15 mm below the top insert [12].

Figure 22

Fig. 20. (a) Conventional antipodal Vivaldi antenna and comb-shaped slits antipodal Vivaldi antenna with WSUB × LSUB = 120 × 202 mm2, WA2 = 84 mm, W2 = 59.43 mm, L1 = 229 mm, L2 = 80 mm, Wf = 1.14 mm, Lf = 15 mm, Wg = 50 mm, Lg = 15 mm, Wc = 1 mm, Lc = 17 mm, B = 25. (b) Schematic of concrete beam with two foam inserts imaged by the proposed antenna at standoff distance d [d = 10 mm] [50].

Figure 23

Fig. 21. (a) Single parametric antenna [dimensions in “mm”]. (b) Antenna array surrounding the breast with the tumor in it [52].

Figure 24

Table 4. Comparison of different Vivaldi antennas used in microwave imaging applications

Figure 25

Fig. 22. Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with dielectric director having L = 108 mm, W = 70 mm, Wa = 42 mm, Ld = 32 mm, Lf = 72 mm, Lt1 = 13.5 mm, Lt2 = 11.8 mm, Wt1 = 26 mm, Wt2 = 26.5 mm [49].

Figure 26

Table 5. Comparison of Vivaldi antennas with dielectric director

Figure 27

Fig. 23. Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with a dielectric slab [61].

Figure 28

Table 6. Comparison of Vivaldi antennas based on a dielectric slab

Figure 29

Fig. 24. (a) Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with parasitic lens having a1 = 66 mm, a2 = 33 mm, b1 = 32 mm, b2 = 26 mm, c1 = 40 mm, c2 = 20 mm, d1 = 30 mm, d2 = 10 mm, de = 36 mm. (b) E-field distribution at high frequencies [63].

Figure 30

Fig. 25. Geometry of antipodal Vivaldi antenna with bandpass filter [14].

Figure 31

Table 7. Comparison of Vivaldi antenna with parasitic lens

Figure 32

Fig. 26. (a) Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with metamaterial having LT = 5.25 mm, L = 3 mm, g = 0.2 mm, HT = 4. (b) Gain boosting using metamaterial [66].

Figure 33

Table 8. Comparison of different Vivaldi antenna using metamaterial

Figure 34

Fig. 27. (a) Dual polarized antipodal Vivaldi antenna with W × L × h = 80×60 × 1.6 mm3. (b) Narrowband current distribution. (c) Wideband current distribution [72].