Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T21:33:38.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular evidence of sustained urban malaria transmission in Amazonian Brazil, 2014–2015

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2020

L. C. Salla
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
P. T. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
R. M. Corder
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
I. C. Johansen
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
S. Ladeia-Andrade
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M. U. Ferreira*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: M. U. Ferreira, E-mail: muferrei@usp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative contribution of imported vs. locally acquired infections to urban malaria burden remains largely unexplored in Latin America, the most urbanised region in the developing world. Here we use a simple molecular epidemiology framework to examine the transmission dynamics of Plasmodium vivax in Mâncio Lima, the Amazonian municipality with the highest malaria incidence rate in Brazil. We prospectively genotyped 177 P. vivax infections diagnosed in urban residents between June 2014 and July 2015 and showed that local parasites are structured into several lineages of closely related microsatellite haplotypes, with the largest genetic cluster comprising 32% of all infections. These findings are very unlikely under the hypothesis of multiple independent imports of parasite strains from the rural surroundings. Instead, the presence of an endemic near-clonal parasite lineage circulating over 13 consecutive months is consistent with a local P. vivax transmission chain in the town, with major implications for malaria elimination efforts in this and similar urban environments across the Amazon.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Hypotheses regarding the origin of urban malaria cases. (a) Cases diagnosed in urban residents are exclusively imported from rural villages. In this scenario, the urban centre is purely a sink (represented by interrupted lines) and the rural villages are the sources of parasites introduced into the urban centre, but are not connected to each other. Arrows indicate parasite mobility between locations and self-loops indicate parasite transmission within each site. Note that colour-coded parasite lineages from each of the three villages (represented by small circles) are introduced into the urban centre (large circle) but are not further transmitted in the town, as indicated by the absence of a self-loop. Each parasite lineage found in urban dwellers has been independently introduced by migration; identical or closely related parasites are occasionally found in the town because different people may have been infected in the same source village. (b) Cases diagnosed in urban residents may be either imported or locally acquired. In this scenario, parasite lineages from rural villages are introduced into the urban area and further spread locally among urban residents, as indicated by the presence of a self-loop. As a result, parasite transmission chains (represented as parasites connected by lines) are observed in urban residents. Parasites in the same transmission chain form clusters of identical or closely related haplotypes (clonal or near-clonal lineages) here termed haplogroups. Human mobility also introduces into rural villages some parasite lineages that originate from another rural village but circulate in the town; therefore, the town is both a source and a sink of parasites.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Map of South America showing the location of the study site, the municipality of Mâncio Lima in the state of Acre, north-western Brazil, next to the border with Peru.

Figure 2

Table 1. Overall diversity of 14 microsatellite loci in 177 P. vivax isolates from the town of Mâncio Lima, Brazil (2014–15)

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Pairwise comparisons of P. vivax haplotypes from independent infections in an urban setting in north-western Brazil. For each infection, the predominant allele at each of the 14 microsatellite loci analysed was considered for defining haplotypes. (a) Observed number of different alleles or mismatches in pairwise comparisons of haplotypes from 177 completely genotyped P. vivax isolates (bars) and expected number of mismatches under random association of alleles in a panmictic population (continuous line; data from 50 000 simulated datasets in which alleles were randomly reshuffled among haplotypes). Note that the observed (9.3) and expected (9.2) average numbers of allele mismatches were quite similar, although the overall distributions differ. (b) Observed distribution of the number of mismatches between each haplotype and its most closely related haplotype in the population, or ‘distance-to-nearest distribution’ (represented by bars), and expected distance-to-nearest distribution under random association of alleles (continuous line; data from 50 000 simulated datasets as above). The observed average distance to the nearest neighbour (2.0 mismatches) was much smaller than the expected average distance (5.1 mismatches). (c) Reasons for the departure from panmictic expectations in pairwise comparisons between haplotypes. The excess of pairwise comparisons between closely related haplotypes sharing ≥12 alleles observed in our population putatively arises from comparisons between isolates within clonal lineages or haplogroups (similarly coloured symbols within circles), as indicated by red arrows. Conversely, the excess of pairwise comparisons between distantly related haplotypes sharing ⩽3 alleles putatively arises from comparisons between isolates from different clonal lineages, as indicated by black arrows.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Minimal spanning tree representing the connectivity among haplotypes within 21 haplogroups found in the urban P. vivax population. Note that the most common of them, haplogroup 1, is represented in red and comprises 57 isolates and 35 unique haplotypes; six haplotypes within haplogroup 1 are shared by ≥2 isolates. Circles represent haplotypes with size logarithmically proportional to the number of isolates sharing them. The largest haplogroups (≥5 isolates) are colour coded as in Supplementary Fig. S1. Haplogroups with four, three and two isolates are represented with increasingly darker grey tones and singletons are shown as unconnected black circles. Lines connect pairs of haplotypes with one or two allele mismatches and the overall network represents the most likely haplotype genealogy generated by the goeBURST algorithm.

Figure 5

Table 2. Standardised index of association ${\rm (}I_{\rm A}^{\rm S} )$ as a measure of multi-locus LD in P. vivax isolates from the town of Mâncio Lima, Brazil (2014–15)

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Spatial distribution of parasites within haplogroup 1 (red circles) and all other haplotypes (grey circles) found to circulate in Mâncio Lima. We show data for 155 study subjects (including 52 subjects carrying haplogroup 1 parasites); two houses with GPS coordinates fell outside the urban centre. Circle sizes are linearly proportional to the number of infections diagnosed in the same household. Note that haplogroup 1 parasites were found in patients from across the town, with no apparent spatial clustering.

Supplementary material: File

Salla et al. supplementary material

Salla et al. supplementary material

Download Salla et al. supplementary material(File)
File 175.3 KB