Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T00:58:12.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From representation to reality: ancient Egyptian wax head cones from Amarna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

Anna Stevens*
Affiliation:
Centre for Ancient Cultures, SOPHIS, Monash University, Wellington Road, Melbourne, Victoria3800, Australia McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3ER, UK
Corina E. Rogge
Affiliation:
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston, P.O. Box 6826, Houston, TX77265-6826, USA
Jolanda E.M.F. Bos
Affiliation:
Archaeology and Heritage Consultancy Blikveld & Bos, Patrijzenstraat 11, 2042 CL, Zandvoort, the Netherlands
Gretchen R. Dabbs
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Drive, Mail Code 4502, Carbondale, IL62901, USA
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: anna.stevens@monash.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Images of ancient Egyptians wearing distinctive, cone-shaped objects on their heads have, in the absence of physical examples, long elicited scholarly debate. Did people wear these cones, or were they a purely iconographic device? What was their function and meaning? Recent excavations at the Amarna cemeteries now provide the first material examples of head cones. Spectroscopic analyses indicate that their primary constituent is a biological wax, and not fat or incense, as sometimes speculated. The authors tentatively suggest that the Amarna cones were symbols meant to enhance the rebirth or personal fertility of the deceased in the afterlife.

Information

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019
Figure 0

Figure 1. Depictions of ancient Egyptian head cones, all from Amarna: Top left) two figures wear cones in a partially reconstructed wall painting from a private chapel at the Workmen's Village (reconstruction by F. Weatherhead); right) funerary stela from the South Tombs Cemetery, showing a seated man and woman wearing head cones (object 39938); bottom left) stela showing a female with a head cone worshipping the goddess Taweret, and a female figurine found nearby, also with a head cone (Egypt Exploration Society Lucy Gura Archive Amarna Negatives 21/521 and 21/528; © Egypt Exploration Society).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of Amarna showing the non-elite cemeteries in red (map by B. Kemp, incorporating survey data by H. Fenwick).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Excavations at the North Tombs Cemetery in 2017 (image courtesy of the Amarna Project).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Cone 1 in situ on the head of individual 150 (image courtesy of the Amarna Project).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Sequence plan of the excavation of individual 150, with cone 1 in situ (illustration by M. Shepperson).

Figure 5

Figure 6. The largest pieces of cone 1 showing the outer (above) and inner faces; the close-ups below are of the inner surface, with probable textile impressions/remains visible in the right-hand image. The scale bar relates only to the images above it (image courtesy of the Amarna Project).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Sequence plan of the excavation of individual 1032 (illustration by M. Shepperson).

Figure 7

Figure 8. The largest pieces of cones 1 and 2, with the joining pieces from the top and side of cone 1 placed in their probable original positions, viewed front-on (image courtesy of the Amarna Project).

Figure 8

Figure 9. A) DRIFTS spectra of modern beeswax, and cones 1 and 2. The peaks marked with ‘*’or ‘•’ are due to calcium-fatty acid complexes and calcium carbonate, respectively (the reflective surface of the modern beeswax reference results in derivative-shaped C-H stretching peaks); B) X-ray fluorescence spectra of the exterior (red) and interior (blue) of cone 1. The Kα peaks of elements are labelled (illustration by C. Rogge).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Scenes in the Amarna Royal Tomb probably relating the death of Princess Meketaten, who is shown wearing a head cone. The presence of the cone in the right-hand scene is less certain; it only appears in this early copy of the relief, which is now badly damaged. Left) after Martin (1989: pl. 68); right: after Bouriant et al. (1903: pl. 6).