Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T06:54:03.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toll-interacting protein participates in immunity and development of the lepidopteran insect Antheraea pernyi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2023

Zhe Chen
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Awei Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Xuan Xu
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Lu Ding
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Xiaojiao Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Cen Qian
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
Baojian Zhu*
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Corresponding author: Baojian Zhu; Email: zhubaojian@ahau.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Toll-interacting protein (Tollip) participates in multiple biological processes. However, the biological functions of Tollip proteins in insects remain to be further explored. Here, the genomic sequence of tollip gene from Antheraea pernyi (named Ap-Tollip) was identified with a length of 15,060 bp, including eight exons and seven introns. The predicted Ap-Tollip protein contained conserved C2 and CUE domains and was highly homologous to those tollips from invertebrates. Ap-Tollip was highly expressed in fat body compared with other determined tissues. As far as the developmental stages were concerned, the highest expression level was found at the 14th day in eggs or the 3rd day of the 1st instar. Ap-Tollip was also obviously regulated by lipopolysaccharide, polycytidylic acid or 20E in different tissues. In addition, the interaction between Ap-Tollip and ubiquitin was confirmed by western blotting and pull-down assay. RNAi of Ap-Tollip significantly affected the expression levels of apoptosis and autophagy-related genes. These results indicated that Ap-Tollip was involved in immunity and development of A. pernyi.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Primers for the PCR amplification of Ap-Tollip genomic sequence

Figure 1

Table 2. Primers used for real-time PCR, protein expression and RNAi

Figure 2

Figure 1. Genomic sequence analysis of Ap-Tollip. The exons and introns were marked by black and gray, respectively. UTR, untranslated region.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (a) Sequence alignment of Ap-Tollip with other insect Tollips. The conserved C2 domain was boxed and the CUE domain was double underlined. The predicted three-dimensional structure of Ap-Tollip was shown at the bottom right-hand corner. (b) Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method based on the amino acid sequences of Tollip proteins from different species. Numbers close to each branching point indicate the percentage of 1000 bootstrap iterations supporting the branch. The GenBank numbers for these tollip sequences are:Bombyx mori (XP_037871305), Vanessa atalanta (XP_047538853), Pararge aegeria (XP_039747777), Manduca sexta (XP_030035003), Pieris rapae (XP_022120383), Ostrinia furnacalis (XP_028157188), Mus musculus (CAB58121), Gallus gallus (NP_001006471), Bos taurus (NP_001035050), Homo sapiens (CAB58118), Macaca mulatta (NP_001248200), Salmo salar (ACI33751), Ctenopharyngodon idella (AFM09715),Larimichthys crocea (XP_027137215), Penaeus vannamei (AET79206), Penaeus japonicus (BAK19511), Mizuhopecten yessoensis (AKO62848), Mytilus galloprovincialis (AHI17285), Apis mellifera (XP_624417), Anopheles gambiae (XP_562476), Anoplophora glabripennis (XP_018572445), Tribolium madens (XP_044255367), Halyomorpha halys (XP_014283422), Nilaparvata lugens (XP_022189393), Locusta migratoria (AWJ58418), Blattella germanica (PSN31565), Zootermopsis nevadensis (XP_021925455), Plutella xylostella (XP_037976358), Papilio machaon (XP_045539518), Eumeta japonica (GBP04589), Leguminivora glycinivorella (AXS59135), Bombyx mandarina (XP_028042731), Danaus plexippus plexippus (XP_032522997), Spodoptera frugiperda (XP_050552012), Galleria mellonella (XP_026751574).

Figure 4

Figure 2. Fig 2. continue

Figure 5

Figure 3. Protein expression, purification (a) and western blotting of Ap-Tollip (b). The protein expression of Ap-Tollip was induced by IPTG. Crude extracts of E. coli transformed with pET-28 (a+) vector or pET-28 (a+)-Tollip recombinant plasmids were subjected to SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250. The western blot was performed using anti-His tag antibodies. M, protein marker.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Protein expression, purification (a) and western blotting of Ap-Ubiquitin (b). Crude extracts of E. coli transformed with pGEX-4 T-1 vector or pGEX-4 T-Ubiquitin recombinant plasmids were used for SDS-PAGE analysis. The western blot was carried out using anti-GST tag antibodies. M, protein marker.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Pull-down assay of Ap-Tollip and Ap-Ubiquitin. (a) SDS-PAGE of collected eluate. (b) Western blotting of Ap-Ubiquitin. Tollip, purified Ap-Tollip protein; Tollip + Ubiquitin, protein eluate; Ubiquitin, purified Ap-Ubiquitin protein; Agarose, Agarose Gel control; M, protein Marker.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Tissue distribution of Ap-Tollip. The expression levels of Ap-Tollip were determined by real-time PCR and western blotting. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and presented as the mean ± SE of independent experiments performed in triplicate. Bars labeled with different letters indicated significant differences (P < 0.05). Western blot of tubulin was used as a control.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Expression of Ap-Tollip in egg (a) and larvae (b). Real-time PCR was used to determine the expression levels of Ap-Tollip. The relative expression of Ap-Tollip was calculated using the 2−ΔΔct method and 18S rRNA gene was used as an internal reference. The data were presented as the mean ± SE and each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Expression profiles of Ap-Tollip in fat bodies and hemocytes under Poly (I: C) (a and b) or LPS (c and d) challenge. These tissues were collected 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 h post-injection and the PBS-injected groups were used as the calibrators. Bars represent mean ± S.E. (n = 3) and asterisks represented significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 11

Figure 9. Expression levels of Ap-Tollip in fat bodies after 20-hydroxyecdysone induction. The Ap-Tollip mRNA level in the PBS-injected group was designated as a control. Significant differences between control and treatment groups were indicated by asterisks.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Effect of Ap-Tollip RNAi on the expression of candidate genes. (a) Expression of apoptosis-related genes at 48 h after RNAi. (b) Expression of autophagy-related genes at 48 h after RNAi. The dsEGFP-injected group was used as a control.

Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 57.9 KB