D. Nörr, ‘Prozessuales (und mehr) in der lex rivi Hiberiensis’, ZSS 125 (2008), 108–88, makes or implies a number of suggestions in relation to the text published by F. Beltrán Lloris, ‘An irrigation decree from Roman Spain: the Lex rivi Hiberiensis’, JRS 96 (2006), 149–97; suggestions that are certainly, or sometimes almost certainly, right and that should be adopted or considered by all those who cite or use the text.

Col. II, line 34, Nörr implies a probable reading ‘quantum eius inṭẹ[rerit -?-]’ (p. 160, n. 255)

Col. II, line 48, read certainly ‘prohibuerit aut dare no[luerit -?-]’

Col. II, line 54, the proposal in the apparatus, ‘… luito; ni<s>i [luerit …]’ is to be accepted (p. 172)

Col. III, line 18, read probably ‘[XXV quantumue eiu]s intererit …’ (p. 160)

Col. III, lines 19–20, the proposal in the apparatus, ‘dum ipse ca / [ueri sibi ab eo no]n recuset’ is to be rejected (p. 160, n. 259)

Col. III, line 43, the verb should be ‘facere’, not ‘dare’; ‘oportere’ is in any case also required, but ‘[illi facere oportere ei]us …’ is too long; the engraver perhaps omitted ‘illi’ in error, so ‘[<illi> facere oportere ei]us …’

Col. III, line 45, read ‘[iur. Imp. …]’, rather than ‘[iuridicus Imp. …]’ with Nörr, on grounds of length

Col. III, line 47, read ‘[… pagi Gallo]rum’.

The translation of §12 should then read ‘… he should be obliged to pay [25] denarii [or as much as] shall be at stake [for him]’.