Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:17:51.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An in situ, micro-scale investigation of inorganically and organically driven rare-earth remobilisation during weathering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Alexander Kalintsev*
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, 9 Rainforest Walk, VIC 3800, Australia
Joël Brugger
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, 9 Rainforest Walk, VIC 3800, Australia
Barbara Etschmann
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, 9 Rainforest Walk, VIC 3800, Australia
Rahul Ram
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, 9 Rainforest Walk, VIC 3800, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: Alexander Kalintsev, Email: alexander.kalintsev@monash.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At present, a significant portion of rare-earth elements (REEs) are sourced from weathering profiles. The mineralogy of the protolith plays an important role in controlling the fate of REEs during weathering, as accessory minerals contain the bulk the REE budget in most rocks, and different minerals vary in their susceptibilities to weathering processes. REE supergene deposits (‘adsorption clay deposits’) are associated with deep weathering in tropical environments, which often precludes characterisation of the incipient steps in REE liberation from their host minerals in the protolith. Here we have targeted a weathered REE-enriched lithology from a sub-arid environment undergoing relatively rapid uplift, namely the Yerila Gneiss from the Northern Flinders Ranges, Australia, where regolith was shallow or absent and parent rock material had yet to completely break down. Results from X-ray fluorescence mapping, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SEM-focussed ion beam milling (FIB-SEM), inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and laser ablation ICP-MS highlight the migration pathways of REEs and associated U and Th from allanite-(Ce) grains that are the main REE host within Yerila Gneiss material. Migration of light REEs and Th away from the allanite-(Ce) grains via radial cracks resulting from allanite-(Ce) metamictisation was interpreted to result from weathering, as Ce is partially present in its tetravalent oxidation state and Th mobility is most easily explained by the involvement of organic ligands. FIB-SEM provides further evidence for the importance of biogenic processes in REE+U/Th mobility and fractionation in uranothorite-associated spheroidal structures associated with the weathering of allanite-(Ce). Organic carbon was also found in association with a xenotime-(Y) grain; in this case, REE liberation is most likely a by-product of biogenic phosphate utilisation. These results highlight that local controls (at mineral interfaces) mediated by biota and/or biogenic organic matter can control the initiation of REE (+Th,U) mobilisation during weathering.

Information

Type
Article – Frank Reith memorial issue
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Bulk chondrite-normalised REE concentrations for samples MUD3 and YER04. Data from prior analyses of the Yerila Gneiss are also reported.

Figure 1

Table 1. Results of major-element analysis (wt.%) and bulk REE + U/Th concentrations (ppm) on samples MUD3 and YER04.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. X-ray fluorescence maps of thin sections illustrating migration of REEs through micro fractures. Colour intensity is proportional to the concentration of the element of interest with intermediary colours indicating simultaneous presence of multiple elements at a given site. (a,b) selected sites of interest from MUD3 thin section – metamict and altered allanite-(Ce) (Orange grains) with radiating fractures acting as channel ways for mobilised REEs (some illustrated with arrows, red and yellow microfractures). Light green and blue–green grains are titanite and apatite, dark blue grains are mainly fluorite. (c) Overview of allanite grains and surrounding microfractures in sample YER04. A number of uranothorite grains (yellow) are visible, both as isolated grains and inclusions in the large central allanite grain. Thorium redistribution is also visible through cracks and along grain boundaries (white arrows) with a strong spatial association with allanite. Small (single pixel, ≤2 μm, visible as yellow) particles rich in uranium (±Th) are also visible throughout the sample. (d) Detail of altered euhedral allanite-(Ce) grain shown in (c), note the uranothorite inclusions (light blue–green) are associated with anomalous cerium-rich rings.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Results of cerium XANES mapping. (a) Selected mapped area shown as a yellow rectangle. (b) Correlations among intensities of the CeLα line at CeLα fluorescence band at 5.725 keV [Ce(III)] and 5.7365 keV [Ce(IV)]. (c) Distribution of Ce in the XANES stack area. (d) Location of the pixels highlighted in (b). (e) XANES spectra of reference spectra (from Ram et al., 2019) and those extracted from the regions defined in (b).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of decomposed allanite-(Ce) grain and structures within: (a) overview of allanite-(Ce) grain containing anomalous Th- and REE-bearing circular structures with several sites of interest labelled; (b) detail of site LAC1; (c) detail of site FIB1, note the presence of polishing diamonds in the gap layer together with the carbonaceous clay; (d) detail of site LAC2; and (e) detail of site FIB2. Of particular interest is a xenotime-(Y) grain with ‘fuzzy’, possibly decomposing rim. Much of the surrounding dark material consists of highly carbonaceous, possibly organic material. Abbreviations: ‘Bst’ – bastnäsite-(Ce), ‘Carb’ – carbonaceous clay material, ‘Di’ – polishing diamonds, ‘REE-Fcb’ – REE fluorocarbonate, ‘Uth’ – Y-rich uranothorite, ‘Ur’ – uraninite nanocrystals and ‘Xen’ – xenotime-(Y).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. SEM micrographs of site FIB1 (Fig. 3c). (a) Overview of milled site, pit depth was ~20 μm. Note the exposed face does not reach the uranothorite core. (b) Detail of the milled face, note the well-ordered layered structure. Layer ‘i’ is composed of the REE-fluorocarbonate described earlier, ‘ii’ is a cavernous layer partly in-filled with polishing diamonds, ‘iii’ is a layer of carbonaceous (~46 at.% C) material that also contains up to 10 at.% of both aluminium Al and silicon Si, ‘iv’ has an overall similar composition to ‘iii’ though with less silicon Si and aluminium Al (~5 at.%) and more iron Fe (5–10 at.%); this layer also contains numerous uraninite nanocrystals seen as embedded fibrous white flecks. ‘C’ and ‘D’ indicate the areas shown in detail in (c) and (d), respectively. (c) Detail of cavity, the grains on the upper right are diamonds emplaced during polishing. (d) Detail of the outer reaches of the circular structure, the white fibrous specks are uraninite nanocrystals The whole layer appears to be defined by abundant irregularly shaped cavities and a matrix of acicular/platy nanocrystals. (e–h) X-ray element-distribution maps of the face shown in (b). Note the distinct elemental compositions of the two carbonaceous layers ‘iii’ and ‘iv’ with ‘iii’ being rich in silicon and aluminium whereas ‘iv’ has more iron and uranium rich.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. SEM micrographs of site FIB2. (a) Overview of milled face, imaged in BSE mode. ‘Xen’ – xenotime-(Y) grain of interest, ‘Bst’ – bastnäsite-(Ce) grain, ‘Crb(?)’ – carbonaceous phase composed primarily of carbon C with variable significant quantities of iron and aluminium. ‘B’ and ‘D’ indicate the areas shown in detail in ‘B’ and ‘D’, respectively. (b) Details of the carbon-rich layer surrounding the edge of the xenotime-(Y) grains, note its similarity to the detail of layer ‘iv’ shown in Fig. 4d. Note the texturally distinct halo of LREE-enriched carbonaceous material (LREE+) visible along the interface of the xenotime grain. EDS measurements recorded LREE concentrations on the order of 10 wt% each La, Ce and Nd in this material; a significant enrichment compared to the neighbouring xenotime-(Y) (~1 wt.% each). (c) Details of the edge of the xenotime-(Y) grain, note its highly porous structure associated with fibrous/platy nanocrystals. (d) Detail along another edge of the xenotime-(Y) grain, similar textures are observed here. The continuity of the porous LREE-enriched rim around the xenotime-(Y) grain seems to imply that the xenotime-(Y) is the source of these LREEs rather than the neighbouring bastnäsite-(Ce) grain. (e–g) X-ray element distribution maps of the site shown in (a); note the somewhat ‘fuzzier’ boundary of the xenotime grain relative to the neighbouring bastnäsite-(Ce) grain.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) LREE/HREE fractionation (quantified as La/Yb) and cerium anomalies across LAC2. La/Yb and Ce/Ce* values for the whole rock sample are presented as a background reference signal. The light-blue rectangle delineates the traverse path from which the data presented were measured. (b) Chondrite-normalised REE concentrations in the key compositional layers of LAC2. ‘Core’ – uranothorite core of the structure, ‘REE-Fcb’ – light fluorocarbonate layer, ‘Outer Rim’ – circumscribing carbonaceous material containing uraninite nanocrystals (layers ‘iii’ and ‘iv’ in Fig. 5b), ‘Average Host’ – Allanite-(Ce) grain hosting the spheroidal structure, ‘YER04 Bulk’ – concentrations of REEs reported in Table 1 and Fig. 1.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Frank (foreground), Alexander (kneeling) and Jeremiah Shuster on the field in the Mount Babbage Inlier, 28 May 2017.

Supplementary material: File

Kalintsev et al. supplementary material

Kalintsev et al. supplementary material

Download Kalintsev et al. supplementary material(File)
File 827.3 KB