Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T16:00:00.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of A-site substitution on electrical conductivity and microstructure of YAlO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2012

Ramya Hariharan
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
Prakash Gopalan*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: pgopalan@iitb.ac.in

Abstract

A systematic evaluation of the electrical conductivity of Sr-substituted YAlO3 system has been performed. A comparison between the Ca- and Sr-doped YAlO3 systems is reported. The samples have been synthesized by citrate gel route, and the electrical conductivity measurements have been conducted in air in the 300–800 °C temperature range. The influence of phase development of the compositions on the total conductivity has been investigated using the x-ray diffraction technique. Also, the effect of microstructure and composition of the phases evolved on the electrical conductivity has been analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrum techniques.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. XRD patterns of selective compositions of Y1−xSrxAlO3−δ system (x = 0–0.1).

Figure 1

FIG. 2. The variation of sintered density of Y1−xSrxAlO3−δ samples as a function of Sr doping.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Nyquist plots of Y0.96Sr0.04AlO3−δ composition at different temperatures in air.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Plot of total conductivity as a function of inverse of temperature for Y1−xSrxAlO3−δ system (x = 0.02–0.1).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Comparison of total conductivities of undoped and A-site-doped YAlO3 for x = 0.1 composition.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Activation energy as a function of A-site dopant concentration.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. SEM micrograph in secondary electron mode of (a) Y0.9Ca0.1AlO3−δ and (b) Y0.9Sr0.1AlO3−δ compositions.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Qualitative compositional analysis of Y0.9Sr0.1AlO3−δ using EDS mapping.