Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T11:22:29.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of paleoenvironments in the Cis-Ural steppes during the mid- to late Holocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

Olga Khokhlova*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, 142290, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia
Nina Morgunova
Affiliation:
Orenburg State Pedagogical University, ul. Sovetskaya, 19, 460014, Orenburg, Russia
Alexander Khokhlov
Affiliation:
Insitute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 3, 142290, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia
Alexandra Golyeva
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi pereulok, 29, 119017, Moscow, Russia
*
*Corresponding author at: Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, 142290, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia. E-mail address: olga_004@rambler.ru (O. Khokhlova).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The multi-layered settlement of Turganik in the Tok River valley (steppe region west of the Urals) has been studied using paleopedological and microbiomorphical methods. Early humans lived in the settlement during the Eneolithic epoch (the fifth millennium BC) and in the Early Bronze Age (the fourth millennium BC). The cultural layers attributable to the Atlantic period of the Holocene developed under conditions of a rather dry climate, with the landscapes being dominated by the grass and herb steppe. The settlement area was above the flood water level and was suitable for habitation. The soils in its vicinity were Kastanozems (Endosalic Protosodic). The final stages of the cultural layer formation bear traces of strong (though short-term) floods, with the deposits of the latter partly concealed traces of the preceding long-term arid phase. Maximum aridity was during the final interval of the Atlantic period. The Subboreal and Subatlantic periods were noted for meadow-chernozem soil formation (Luvic Chernozems [Stagnic]) and an increasing proportion of arboreal species in the pollen assemblages. Some phytoliths of aquatic plants were found in the assemblages dominated by those of meadow grasses. The climate was more humid and cool, although short episodes of aridity were possible.

Information

Type
Thematic Set: Drylands
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1 (color online) (a and b) Location of the studied region and (c) the objects of the cultural heritage in the microregion: 1, Turganik settlement; 2, Toksky II settlement; 3, Ivanovsky dune with Ivanovsky ground cemetery; 4, Ivanovskoye II multi-layered settlement; 5, Staro-Tokskaya site; 6, Toksky I settlement; 7, Ivanovsky I kurgan cemetery.

Figure 1

Figure 2 (color online) Morphology of the studied sequence, Tr1b-15, and the position of the identified layers.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (color online) The distribution of soil characteristics over the studied layers of the Tr1b-15 sequence: (a) total Р2О5 ,%; (b) Corg and Ccarb, %; (c) fractions <0.001 mm and <0.01 mm, %; (d) pHwater; (e) loss on ignition, %; (f) SO4 of gypsum, %.

Figure 3

Figure 4 (color online) Distribution of the exchangeable bases over the studied sequence Tr1b-15.

Figure 4

Figure 5 (color online) Distribution of the geochemical indices (a–l) and magnetic susceptibility, ×10–6 m3/kg (m), over the studied layers in the Tr1b-15 sequence.

Figure 5

Figure 6 (color online) The microstructure of the studied layers in the Tr1b-15 sequence. See the text for explanations. All the photographs were taken with plane polarized light (PPL) at the same magnification, except for (e) and (g).

Figure 6

Figure 7 (color online) Elements of microstructure of the studied layers in the Tr1b-15 sequence. See the text for explanations. All the photographs were taken with cross polarized light (XPL).

Figure 7

Figure 8 Different forms of silica microbiomorphs: (a) sponge spicula; (b) diatom; (c) phytolith of stipa grasses; (d) phytolith of reed; (e) phytolith of meadow grasses; and (f) phytolith of coniferous.

Figure 8

Table 1 Comparative semi-quantitative contents of microbiomorphs. Estimated content of the microbiomorphs: +++, high; ++, medium; +, low.

Figure 9

Table 2 Distribution of siliceous microbiomorphs (counted/%) and diagnostic groups of phytoliths (%). Numbers 1 to 6 designate the diagnostic groups of phytoliths as follows: 1, herbs; 2, coniferous needles; 3, forest grasses; 4, meadow grasses; 5, steppe grasses (mostly Stipa sp.); 6, reed and sedges.

Figure 10

Table 3 The age of the layers, main indices of soil processes, pollen and phytolith assemblages, and paleoclimatic reconstruction.