Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:03:21.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating indwelling devices and other risk factors for mortality in invasive Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in Georgia, 2012–2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2024

Lucy S. WittOpen the ORCID record for Lucy S. Witt[Opens in a new window],
Mary Elizabeth SextonOpen the ORCID record for Mary Elizabeth Sexton[Opens in a new window],
Gillian Smith,
Monica FarleyOpen the ORCID record for Monica Farley[Opens in a new window] and
Jesse T. JacobOpen the ORCID record for Jesse T. Jacob[Opens in a new window]
Lucy S. Witt*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, GA, USAAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Mary Elizabeth Sexton
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Gillian Smith
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, GA, USAAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Monica Farley
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, GA, USAAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Jesse T. Jacob
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, GA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Lucy S. Witt; Email: lwitt@emory.edu

Abstract

Objective:

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections are a public health threat due to the risk of transmission between patients and high associated mortality. We sought to identify risk factors for mortality in patients with invasive CRE infections and to specifically evaluate whether there was an association between indwelling medical devices and 90-day mortality.

Design:

Retrospective observational cohort study of patients infected with CRE in the eight-county metropolitan Atlanta area between 2012 and 2019.

Methods:

Patients with invasive CRE infections were identified via the Georgia Emerging Infections Program’s active, population- and laboratory-based surveillance system and linked with the Georgia Vital Statistics database. We used bivariate analysis to identify risk factors for mortality and completed log binomial multivariable regression to estimate risk ratios (RR) for the association between indwelling devices and mortality.

Results:

In total, 154 invasive CRE infections were identified, with indwelling devices present in most patients (87.7%) around the time of infection. Admission to an intensive care unit was found to be associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted RR [aRR] 1.55, 95% CI 1.07, 2.24); however, the presence of any indwelling device was not associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality in multivariable analysis (aRR 1.22, 95% CI 0.55, 2.73). Having at least two indwelling devices was associated with increased mortality (aRR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05, 3.05).

Conclusions:

Indwelling devices were prevalent in our cohort but were not consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality. Further studies are needed to examine this relationship and the role of device removal.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , 2023, e254
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections are a rapidly growing public health emergency. 1 In 2019, there were approximately 6,000 cases of CRE in the United States (US), and rates have risen since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. 2 CRE’s threat stems both from a high associated mortality (as compared to infections with carbapenem-susceptible organisms Reference Patel, Huprikar, Factor, Jenkins and Calfee3–Reference Schwaber, Klarfeld-Lidji, Navon-Venezia, Schwartz, Leavitt and Carmeli5 ) and from the potential transmissibility of resistance genes to other organisms, as 30%–80% of CRE organisms harbor carbapenem resistance genes, many of which reside on mobile plasmids. 1,Reference Guh, Bulens and Mu6–Reference Satlin, Chen and Gomez-Simmonds9

Enterobacterales can be a part of the normal human microbiome in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. As such, CRE may be nonpathogenic in non-sterile body sites such as wounds, respiratory secretions, and urine. Prior studies characterizing the rates of CRE and demographics of afflicted patients have included colonization, which may have limited their ability to identify risk factors for mortality. Reference Howard-Anderson, Bower and Smith10–Reference Babiker, Clarke and Saul12 Understanding the characteristics of patients with invasive CRE infections and their risk factors for mortality provides a stronger analysis and may suggest future interventions.

Indwelling medical devices including urinary catheters, central venous catheters (CVCs), and endotracheal tubes are common in the modern US healthcare system and are frequently encountered in critically ill and healthcare-exposed patients. Prior studies have suggested that indwelling devices may be a risk factor for acquiring CRE as well as for progression from CRE colonization to invasive disease. Reference Howard-Anderson, Bower and Smith10,Reference Gupta, Limbago, Patel and Kallen13 They have not, however, been consistently linked to mortality risk in patients with CRE. Reference Hu, Chen, Sun and Deng14 Overuse of indwelling devices is known to have multiple negative impacts, and these devices could represent a modifiable risk factor for mortality in patients with CRE infections, given the potential to avoid or reduce their use in high-risk patients.

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to describe sterile site CRE infections and identify associated risk factors for mortality in the Atlanta metropolitan area between 2012 and 2019. We evaluated the annual incidence of infection, as well as the clinical characteristics of patients affected. Using this data, we identified risk factors for all-cause 90-day mortality in patients with invasive CRE infections and developed a model to assess the risk of mortality specifically associated with indwelling devices, a potentially modifiable risk factor.

Methods

Study population

This was a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing data obtained by the Georgia Emerging Infections Program (EIP) (funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) from 2012 to 2019. The Georgia EIP performs active population- and laboratory-based surveillance for CRE in the eight counties surrounding metropolitan Atlanta (Supplementary Figure 1). EIP staff routinely query laboratory testing instruments at each associated microbiology laboratory and identify all relevant organisms that are carbapenem-resistant including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp. Only patients residing in the catchment area are eligible for inclusion in the dataset. For this study, we included only specimens from normally sterile sites, such as blood or peritoneal fluid (Supplementary Table 1), using the first isolate of CRE from each patient in a 30-day period. One patient contributed twice to the dataset having two incident infections, five months apart. This study was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.

Data collection

EIP staff perform chart review of identified cases to capture data in a standard 29-item case report form, including basic patient demographic information such as race and ethnicity, infection site, risk factors including the presence of indwelling devices and patient comorbidities, outcomes including length of stay, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality, and isolate antibiotic susceptibilities. Indwelling medical devices were defined as a CVC, urinary catheter, or any other indwelling medical device in place at any time in the two calendar days prior to infection (Supplementary Table 2). Patient comorbidities were evaluated using a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, which was dichotomized to those with scores less than or equal to two and those with scores higher than two. Length of stay was calculated from admission and discharge date. ICU admission was defined as the patient being in the ICU at any time in the seven days prior to isolate collection. Ninety-day, all-cause mortality after infection was obtained by linking the Georgia EIP patient registry with the Georgia State Office of Vital Records.

Carbapenem resistance

In 2012, the EIP definition for CRE required non-susceptibility to meropenem, doripenem, or imipenem (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) with resistance to all tested third-generation cephalosporins. However, in 2016, the definition was simplified to include any relevant organism resistant to meropenem, doripenem, imipenem, or ertapenem (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL) and susceptibility breakpoints were updated to better align with state public health definitions. To avoid confounding due to this definition change, only patients meeting the 2012 definition across the full-time period (2012–2019) were included in this study (Supplementary Table 3). Reference Howard-Anderson, Bower and Smith10

Data analysis

Trends over time were assessed using a longitudinal analytic approach including generalized estimating equations to evaluate rates of infection per population. Descriptive univariable analyses of basic patient demographics were completed for the entire cohort. Bivariate analyses of continuous and categorial variables’ association with 90-day mortality were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate). Patients never admitted to the hospital and those with missing data regarding hospitalization were excluded from analyses involving hospital length of stay. An investigator created directed acyclic graph (DAG) based on authors’ knowledge of CRE and a nonsystematic literature review was used to inform variable inclusion in the multivariable analysis (Supplementary Figure 2). Multivariable log binomial regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) for the association of CCI >2, ICU admission, long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) stay in the last year, and presence of an indwelling medical device with 90-day mortality. Secondary analyses were completed evaluating whether there was an association between presence of a CVC and mortality, as a CVC was the most common indwelling device and may pose a unique risk for invasive infection, and whether there was an association with presence of at least two indwelling medical devices and mortality. ICU admission was not included in the multivariable model for this secondary analysis due to concern for collinearity between multiple devices and ICU admission, but a sensitivity analysis was completed that included ICU admission to assess its effect on the relationship and the assumption of collinearity. Chronic dialysis was not included in any multivariable model due to collinearity with possession of an indwelling device, although the association between indwelling medical devices and 90-day mortality was stratified by chronic dialysis to assess for interaction. A two-sided p-value of 0.05 was considered significant, and all analyses were completed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Demographic characteristics and trends over time

There were 154 incident cases of invasive CRE infection in the Atlanta area between 2012 and 2019. A majority of patients with invasive CRE infections were male (53.2%); 88.3% were admitted to the hospital at the time of infection, for a median of 20 days (Table 1). Most infections occurred in the bloodstream (84.4%) and 65.6% were Klebsiella pneumoniae (Table 1). Indwelling devices were frequent (87.7%) with the most common device being a CVC (70.8%). One-fifth of patients had both a tracheostomy tube and a percutaneous enteric gastronomy (PEG) tube in place, and 78% of that group had a concurrent CVC. A majority (53.6%) of patients were admitted to the ICU at any time during their hospitalization, and 31.2% had been in the ICU in the seven days prior to isolate collection. Most patients had been admitted to a hospital (81.2%) and 24% had stayed in a LTACH in the last year (Table 1). In-hospital mortality was 23.4% for the entire cohort and 90-day mortality was 42.2%. The annual incidence rate of invasive CRE infections per 100,000 persons decreased over the study period from 0.576 to 0.361 (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections by those with and without indwelling medical devices, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Note. IQR, interquartile range; PEG, percutaneous enteric gastronomy.

*Missing Data – Race 6, Ethnicity 28, Charlson comorbidity index score 2, Length of Stay 2, ICU 3, Polymicrobial 1.

*Did not include 16 patients who were never admitted to the hospital and 2 with missing data.

Other site of infection: bone (1), deep tissue (1), joint/synovial (1), liver (2), ovary (1), peritoneal fluid (12), pleural fluid (2), other normally sterile site (4).

All continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum. All categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square except those marked with ¥ which were analyzed using fisher’s exact test.

Figure 1.

Rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in Georgia 2012–2019.

Patient risk factors associated with mortality

Factors statistically associated with 90-day mortality on bivariate analysis included older age, CCI score >2, admission to the ICU in seven days prior to infection, bloodstream infection, having at least two indwelling devices, and being on chronic dialysis (Table 2). Each additional indwelling medical device above one provided an additional 53% increased odds of mortality (OR 1.53, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.09–2.17). In unadjusted models, ICU admission was associated with mortality with a risk ratio of 1.73 (95% CI 1.22–2.45), as was CCI score >2 (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03–2.15) (Table 3). Having an indwelling device present (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.78–3.67) and previous stay at an LTACH (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.89–1.92) were not associated with 90-day mortality in unadjusted models. In a multivariable model adjusting for ICU admission, CCI score >2, admission to LTACH, and possession of an indwelling medical device, admission to the ICU remained associated with mortality (aRR 1.55, 95% CI 1.07–2.24) while CCI score >2 (aRR 1.62, 95% CI 0.68–3.83), previous stay at LTACH (aRR 1.39, 95% CI 0.60–3.20), and having an indwelling device present (aRR 1.22, 0.55–2.73) were not (Table 3).

Table 2.

Characteristics as related to 90-day mortality in patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Note. IQR, interquartile range.

*Missing data: Race 6, ethnicity 28, Charlson comorbidity index 2, length of stay 2, ICU 3, polymicrobial 1.

Length of stay data did not include 16 patients not admitted to the hospital

Table 3.

Risk ratios for 90-day mortality in patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Note. RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; LTACH, long-term acute care hospital.

1. Adjusted for indwelling device, Charlson comorbidity score, intensive care admission, previous stay at long term acute care.

2. Secondary analysis—adjusted for central venous catheter, Charlson comorbidity score, intensive care admission, and previous stay at long-term acute care.

3. Secondary analysis—adjusted for at least two indwelling devices, Charlson comorbidity score, and previous stay at long-term acute care.

Secondary analyses to further explore the impact of indwelling devices

Looking solely at possession of a CVC (n = 109), there was no increased risk of 90-day mortality for patients in the unadjusted (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.81–1.97) or adjusted model (aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.67–1.68) (Table 3).

Of the 106 patients who had at least two indwelling medical devices, 86% had CVCs and 72% had urinary catheters. An unadjusted model showed an association between having at least two indwelling medical devices and 90-day mortality (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.18–3.38) (Table 3). In the adjusted model without ICU admission included, this relationship persisted (aRR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05–3.05). A sensitivity analysis that included ICU admission in this multivariable model showed a diminished effect estimate with a wider confidence interval for the risk of mortality from at least two indwelling devices (aRR of 1.59, 95% CI 0.93–2.77).

Chronic dialysis and interaction analysis

Approximately one-third of the cohort was on chronic dialysis (n=54). Patients on chronic dialysis were older, with a median age of 61 (IQR 54–69) years, and more likely to be identified as Black race (79.3%) as compared to the total cohort. Almost all patients on chronic dialysis (92.5%) had an indwelling medical device. When stratified by dialysis, the odds ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality in patients with indwelling medical devices was 4.35 (95% CI 0.42–44.88) for patients on chronic dialysis and 1.55 (95% CI 0.46–5.28) for patients not on chronic dialysis.

Discussion

In patients with invasive CRE infections in Georgia between 2012 and 2019, risk factors associated with all-cause 90-day mortality in multivariable modeling included admission to the ICU in the prior seven days and having at least two indwelling devices. Our mortality rate, 42.2%, was slightly higher than previously reported national and local rates, likely from limiting our analysis to only sterile site infections. Reference Guh, Bulens and Mu6,Reference Sexton, Bower, Sukumaran and Jacob11 The rates of invasive CRE infection decreased during our study period, which is reflected in national data. 15 Potential mechanisms for the decrease in rates of CRE include increased focus on antimicrobial stewardship and improved infection control practices from national campaigns. 16 Unfortunately, this trend was reversed after our study period in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for renewed focus on infection prevention efforts. 2

Possession of an indwelling medical device was prevalent in our cohort but was not associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality in multivariable analysis, although having at least two medical devices was. Prior studies exploring the association between indwelling devices and mortality in the setting of invasive infections have had mixed results, although they did not focus specifically on CRE. CVCs have been shown to be associated with lower mortality in Staphylococcus aureus infections when not accompanied by endocarditis, Reference van Hal, Jensen, Vaska, Espedido, Paterson and Gosbell17–Reference Turnidge, Kotsanas and Munckhof19 potentially because they are a removable source of infection. Other studies have suggested that CVCs may be a risk factor for mortality in patients with drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, but these studies did not exclusively evaluate CRE and focused on catheter-associated bloodstream infections, which we did not assess as a separate infection category. Reference Burnham, Rojek and Kollef20,Reference Lee, Moon, Kim, Lee, Lee and Park21 It is possible that indwelling devices are a risk factor for acquiring invasive infection with CRE but are not specifically a mortality risk. For example, Howard-Anderson et al. used Georgia EIP data to show that patients with CRE bacteriuria who had urinary catheters were more likely to develop CRE bacteremia, but they did not examine mortality. Reference Howard-Anderson, Bower and Smith10 Mortality risk appears to be related to overall illness severity, which may explain the association between having at least two indwelling devices and mortality as multiple devices may simply be a surrogate marker for illness severity. However, multiple devices may also increase inflammation and/or increase the bioburden of healthcare-derived bacteria on patients’ bodies, increasing their risk of death. Therefore, it is unclear whether removing indwelling devices would improve survival in patients with invasive CRE infections. Evaluating device removal as a preventive intervention, especially in patients with multiple devices, merits further study.

Other risk variables associated with mortality, specifically ICU admission, are consistent with the hypothesis that illness severity is an important risk factor and with those previously described in the literature. Babiker et al described carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including both CRE and Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp., over almost 20 years at a single center in Pennsylvania and found an association between 30-day mortality and chronic renal disease, ICU admission, chronic liver disease, and bloodstream infection. Reference Babiker, Clarke and Saul12 Three additional retrospective cohort studies examining mortality risks for patients with CRE infections found that ICU admission was associated with mortality. Reference Nabarro, Shankar and Pragasam22–Reference McConville, Sullivan, Gomez-Simmonds, Whittier and Uhlemann24 While ICU admission is not a risk factor that is easily intervened upon, future studies could focus on risk factors for requiring ICU admission in the setting of an invasive CRE infection, to evaluate potential preventive interventions earlier in a patient’s course.

Patients with invasive CRE infections in Georgia between 2012 and 2019 were severely ill and highly healthcare experienced. This reflects the well-described pathogenesis of CRE, which involves exposure to multiple antibiotics and healthcare facilities where multidrug-resistant pathogens are known to reside on surfaces, the hands of personnel, and in patient rooms. Reference Schwaber, Klarfeld-Lidji, Navon-Venezia, Schwartz, Leavitt and Carmeli5,Reference van Duin, Arias and Komarow8,Reference Schwaber, Lev and Israeli25,Reference Nicolas-Chanoine, Vigan, Laouénan and Robert26

Limitations

This study has several limitations related to the use of retrospective chart review. First, the directionality of the relationship between an indwelling device and mortality is difficult to ascertain. Our data describes indwelling devices in place in the two days prior to culture of CRE; therefore, we cannot elucidate whether the device was placed prior to CRE infection leading to infection and death or was required due to abnormal physiology that developed in the setting of CRE infection. Our study could suggest that limiting the use of invasive medical devices may decrease mortality; however, having numerous medical devices may simply be a surrogate for illness severity. Our small sample size, compounded by the high proportion of patients with indwelling medical devices, limits our ability to observe differences between groups. Additionally, although our investigation is unique in its description of invasive CRE infections, it only represents one urban, southern US region; therefore, the risk factors identified through our study may not be generalizable to other geographic areas. Prior studies have suggested that appropriate antibiotic therapy contributes to survival in patients with CRE infections, but information regarding antibiotic therapy was not available in our dataset, thus this risk factor could not be included in our analysis. Our analysis was limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp. and did not include isolates with resistance to ertapenem alone which likely reduced confounding but may have mildly reduced generalizability. Lastly, our dataset did not include information regarding subsequent removal of indwelling medical devices and thus cannot report whether subsequent device removal affected mortality.

Our study describes invasive CRE infections in the Atlanta metropolitan area between 2012 and 2019 and identified risk factors for mortality. It failed to show a consistent association between indwelling medical devices and increased all-cause 90-day mortality, but did suggest that illness severity, particularly the need for ICU admission, was associated with mortality. Further work should be undertaken to replicate these findings within a national cohort, to explore trends in case rates and mortality after this time interval, and to evaluate potential interventions to decrease patient mortality risk.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.531.

Acknowledgements

All authors would like to thank the Georgia Emerging Infections Program (EIP).

Author contribution

All authors approve of and contributed to this manuscript.

Financial support

LSW was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378 and Award Number TL1TR002382. This work was supported by NIH grant Al158080. EIP Surveillance was funded through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Emerging Infections Program U50CK000485.

Competing interests

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Previous presentation

Preliminary data from this analysis was presented in poster form at the Southeast Regional Clinical and Translational Science Conference in March 2022 and at ID Week 2022 in October 2022.

References

World Health Organization. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics, 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-EMP-IAU-2017.12 Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 U.S. Impact on antimicrobial resistance, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/covid19-impact-report-508.pdf Google Scholar
Patel, G, Huprikar, S, Factor, SH, Jenkins, SG, Calfee, DP. Outcomes of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:1099–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daikos, GL, Petrikkos, P, Psichogiou, M, et al. Prospective observational study of the impact of VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase on the outcome of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1868–1873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwaber, MJ, Klarfeld-Lidji, S, Navon-Venezia, S, Schwartz, D, Leavitt, A, Carmeli, Y. Predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition among hospitalized adults and effect of acquisition on mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:1028–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guh, AY, Bulens, SN, Mu, Y, et al. Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in 7 US Communities, 2012-2013. JAMA 2015;314:1479–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espedido, B, Iredell, J, Thomas, L, Zelynski, A. Wide dissemination of a carbapenemase plasmid among gram-negative bacteria: implications of the variable phenotype. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:4918–4919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Duin, D, Arias, CA, Komarow, L, et al. Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:731–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satlin, MJ, Chen, L, Gomez-Simmonds, A, et al. Impact of a rapid molecular test for Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase and Ceftazidime-Avibactam use on outcomes after bacteremia caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:2066–2075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard-Anderson, JR, Bower, CW, Smith, G, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteriuria and subsequent bacteremia: a population-based study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020:1–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sexton, ME, Bower, C, Sukumaran, S, Jacob, JT. Comparison of 30- and 90-day mortality rates in patients with cultures positive for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter in Atlanta, 2011–2015. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:S44–S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babiker, A, Clarke, LG, Saul, M, et al. Changing Epidemiology and Decreased Mortality Associated With Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria, 2000–2017. Clin Infect Dis 2020;ciaa1464.Google Scholar
Gupta, N, Limbago, BM, Patel, JB, Kallen, AJ. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:60–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Q, Chen, J, Sun, S, Deng, S. Mortality-related risk factors and novel antimicrobial regimens for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review. Infect Drug Resist 2022;15:6907–6926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HAI Data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/index.html Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare Facilities. CRE| HAI | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/cre-facilities.html Google Scholar
van Hal, SJ, Jensen, SO, Vaska, VL, Espedido, BA, Paterson, DL, Gosbell, IB. Predictors of mortality in Staphyloccoccus aureus Bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev 2012;25:362–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, A, Martínez, JA, Mensa, J, et al. Pathogenic significance of methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 2000;30:368–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnidge, JD, Kotsanas, D, Munckhof, W, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a major cause of mortality in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust 2009;191:368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, JP, Rojek, RP, Kollef, MH. Catheter removal and outcomes of multidrug-resistant central-line-associated bloodstream infection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12782–e12782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, YM, Moon, C, Kim, YJ, Lee, HJ, Lee, MS, Park, KH. Clinical impact of delayed catheter removal for patients with central-venous-catheter-related Gram-negative bacteraemia. J Hosp Infect 2018;99:106–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabarro, LEB, Shankar, C, Pragasam, AK, et al. Clinical and Bacterial Risk Factors for Mortality in Children With Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections in India. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2017;36:e161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ara-Montojo, MF, Escosa-García, L, Alguacil-Guillén, M, et al. Predictors of mortality and clinical characteristics among carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections in Spanish children. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021;76:220–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConville, TH, Sullivan, SB, Gomez-Simmonds, A, Whittier, S, Uhlemann, AC. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization (CRE) and subsequent risk of infection and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients, an observational study. PloS One 2017;12:e0186195–e0186195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwaber, MJ, Lev, B, Israeli, A, et al. Containment of a country-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Israeli hospitals via a nationally implemented intervention. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 2011;52:848–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas-Chanoine, MH, Vigan, M, Laouénan, C, Robert, J, “E-carb Study Group.” Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a French case-control-control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol 2019;38:383–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1.Characteristics of patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections by those with and without indwelling medical devices, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Figure 1

Figure 1.Rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in Georgia 2012–2019.

Figure 2

Table 2.Characteristics as related to 90-day mortality in patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Figure 3

Table 3.Risk ratios for 90-day mortality in patients with invasive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections, Atlanta, Georgia, 2012–2019

Supplementary material: File

Witt et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 4.8 MB