Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:51:52.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microfilarial distribution of Loa loa in the human host: population dynamics and epidemiological implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2006

S. D. S. PION
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) – CPC (Centre Pasteur du Cameroun) d'Epidémiologie et de Santé publique, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, BP 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroun Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK
J. A. N. FILIPE
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK
J. KAMGNO
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) – CPC (Centre Pasteur du Cameroun) d'Epidémiologie et de Santé publique, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, BP 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroun
J. GARDON
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) – CPC (Centre Pasteur du Cameroun) d'Epidémiologie et de Santé publique, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, BP 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroun Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UR 24 Epidémiologie et Prévention, CP 9214 Obrajes, La Paz, Bolivia
M.-G. BASÁÑEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK
M. BOUSSINESQ
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) – CPC (Centre Pasteur du Cameroun) d'Epidémiologie et de Santé publique, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, BP 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroun Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Département Sociétés et Santé, 213 rue La Fayette, 75480 Paris Cedex 10, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Severe adverse events (SAEs) following ivermectin treatment may occur in people harbouring high Loa loa microfilarial (mf) densities. In the context of mass ivermectin distribution for onchocerciasis control in Africa, it is crucial to define precisely the geographical distribution of L. loa in relation to that of Onchocerca volvulus and predict the prevalence of heavy infections. To this end, we analysed the distribution of mf loads in 4183 individuals living in 36 villages of central Cameroon. Mf loads were assessed quantitatively by calibrated blood smears, collected prior to ivermectin distribution. We explored the pattern of L. loa mf aggregation by fitting the (zero-truncated) negative binomial distribution and estimating its overdispersion parameter k by maximum likelihood. The value of k varied around 0·3 independently of mf intensity, host age, village and endemicity level. Based on these results, we developed a semi-empirical model to predict the prevalence of heavy L. loa mf loads in a community given its overall mf prevalence. If validated at the continental scale and linked to predictive spatial models of loiasis distribution, this approach would be particularly useful for optimizing the identification of areas at risk of SAEs and providing estimates of populations at risk in localities where L. loa and O. volvulus are co-endemic.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The degree of microfilarial overdispersion in Loa loa, assessed by the k parameter of zero-truncated negative binomial distribution, according to host age and sex ([lozf ]: males; [squf ]: females) for different endemicity levels: (A) prevalence of microfilaraemia in the population aged [ges ]15 years, πi<25%, (B) 25[les ](πi)<35% and (C) (πi)[ges ]35%.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of individuals presenting with Loa loa microfilaraemia among the total number of subjects examined and arithmetic mean of the positive microfilarial loads (in parentheses) for each sex-, age- and endemicity (measured as the mf prevalence) category in the 36 villages of the Lékié division surveyed in 1995–1996

Figure 2

Table 2. Estimates of the linear regression coefficients of the NBD overdispersion parameter k on individual-level variables (host age and sex) and village-level variable (endemicity level) for the distribution of Loa loa microfilarial loads in the Lékié Division, Central Province, Cameroon

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Relationship between the intensity of microfilarial (mf) loads in the population aged [ges ]15 years in the community and the Loa loa microfilarial prevalence in the same age-group. The squares represent the different villages and the bins (black dots) represent the same villages grouped according to their microfilarial prevalence (6 classes, see text). Vertical error bars indicate standard errors of the mean within prevalence bins; horizontal error bars are the standard errors for the mf prevalence using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. The dotted line is the regression line with individual village (Mi=314πi; R2=0·27); the solid line is the regression line for the grouped villages (Mi=316·4πi; R2=0·78).

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Relationship between the degree of microfilarial aggregation among the positive individuals aged [ges ]15 years, assessed by the parameter k of zero-truncated negative binomial distributions, and the intensity of microfilarial loads in the community, expressed as the arithmetic mean of the positive microfilarial counts. Solid line: logarithmic function kj=0·07 log(Mj)−0·31; dashed line: constant function kj=0·3.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Relationship between the proportion (in %) of individuals with microfilarial loads above (A) 8000 mf/ml and (B) 30000 mf/ml and the prevalence of Loa loa microfilaraemia among those aged [ges ]15 years in the community. Diamonds: observed values; solid line, predicted relationship with Mi=314πi and kc=0·3.