Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:25:35.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed germination biology of sweet acacia (Vachellia farnesiana) and response of its seedlings to herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2021

Bhagirath S. Chauhan*
Affiliation:
Professor, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia; Adjunct Professor, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar, Haryana 125004, India
Shane Campbell
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, SAFS, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
Victor J. Galea
Affiliation:
Professor, SAFS, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Bhagirath S. Chauhan, QAAFI and SAFS, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia. (Email: b.chauhan@uq.edu.au)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sweet acacia [Vachellia farnesiana (L.) Willd.] is a problematic thorny weed species in several parts of Australia. Knowledge of its seed biology could help to formulate weed management decisions for this and similar species. Experiments were conducted to determine the effect of hot water (scarification), alternating temperatures, light, salt stress, and water stress on seed germination of two populations of V. farnesiana and to evaluate the response of its young seedlings (the most sensitive developmental stage) to commonly available postemergence herbicides in Australia. Both populations responded similarly to all the environmental factors and herbicides; therefore, data were pooled over the populations. Seeds immersed in hot water at 90 C for 10 min provided the highest germination (88%), demonstrating physical dormancy in this species. Seeds germinated at a wide range of alternating day/night temperatures from 20/10 C (35%) to 35/25 C (90%), but no seeds germinated at 15/5 C. Germination was not affected by light, suggesting that seeds are nonphotoblastic and can germinate under a plant canopy or when buried in soil. Germination was not affected by sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations up to 20 mM, and about 50% of seeds could germinate at 160 mM NaCl, suggesting high salt tolerance ability. Germination was only 13% at −0.2 MPa osmotic potential, and no seeds germinated at −0.4 MPa, suggesting that V. farnesiana seeds may remain ungerminated until moisture conditions have become conducive for germination. A number of postemergence herbicides, including 2,4-D + picloram, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil, provided >85% control of biomass of young seedlings compared with the non-treated control treatment. Knowledge gained from this study will help to predict the potential spread of V. farnesiana in other areas and help to integrate herbicide use with other management strategies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Postemergence herbicides and rates used for evaluation of control of Vachellia farnesiana seedlings at the Gatton Farm of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia (September to December 2020).a

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effect of time length (min) of hot water treatment (90 C) on germination of Vachellia farnesiana seeds incubated at 35/25 C in light/dark conditions for 15 d. Error bar represents LSD where P = 0.05 (n = 12). The experiment was conducted in the weed science lab of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia, in July–August 2020.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Effect of alternating temperature regimes (15/5 to 35/25 C) on germination of Vachellia farnesiana seeds incubated in light/dark conditions for 15 d. Lines represent a sigmoid model [G = a/1 + e[−(x − T50)/b]; G is the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination (%), T50 is the time (d) required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination, and b is the slope] fit to the data, and vertical bars represent standard error of mean. The experiment was conducted in the weed science lab of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia, in August–September 2020.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Effect of sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations (mM) on germination of Vachellia farnesiana seeds incubated at 35/25 C in light/dark conditions for 15 d. The lines represent a sigmoid model [G = a/1 + e[−(x − T50)/b]; G is the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination (%), T50 is the time (d) required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination, and b is the slope] fit to the data, and vertical bars represent standard error of mean (n = 12). The experiment was conducted in the weed science lab of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia, in September–October 2020.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effect of osmotic potential (MPa) on germination of Vachellia farnesiana seeds incubated at 35/25 C in light/dark conditions for 15 d. The lines represent a sigmoid model [G = a/1 + e[−(x − T50)/b]; G is the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination (%), T50 is the time (d) required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination, and b is the slope] fit to the data, and vertical bars represent standard error of mean (n = 12). The experiment was conducted in the weed science lab of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia, in September–October 2020.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Effect of postemergence herbicide application on survival (A) and resulting dry biomass (B) of Vachellia farnesiana when sprayed at the 6- to 7-leaf stage. The experiment was conducted at the Gatton Farm of the University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia, from September to December 2020. Seedling survival and biomass were determined at 28 d after herbicide application. The error bars represent LSD, where P = 0.05 (n = 12), and the percentages above the bar represent percent reduction in biomass compared with the control treatment. Rates (g ai/ae ha−1) of herbicides applied were: 2,4-D, 1,050; 2,4-D + picloram, 90 + 22; fluroxypyr, 100; glufosinate, 750; glyphosate, 740; metsulfuron-methyl, 3; paraquat, 360; saflufenacil, 12.