Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:47:30.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Survey Report on Chinese Journalists in China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This report presents a portrait of contemporary liberal Chinese journalists. Compared with the national average ten years ago, a typical journalist in Guangzhou is younger, better-educated and more likely to be female, and less likely to be a Communist Party member. The survey shows that the literati value coexists with both the modern professional and Party journalism value during the current journalistic professionalization. Such coexistence results in a complexity in journalists' attitude and behaviour. Journalists tend to be inactively liberal: possessing liberal attitudes but not engaging themselves in action. The survey also reports evidence on the contingency of journalistic behaviour logic. Professional logic shows its popularity when journalists encounter conflicts involving legal, economic and political concerns, but not in cases involving moral or cultural conflicts. Neither professional nor commercial logic is strong enough to oppose political logic when journalists are handling severe political issues.

Information

Type
Research Report
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2010
Figure 0

Table 1: Chinese Journalists in Various Surveys

Figure 1

Table 2: Gender Ratio in Different Positions (%)

Figure 2

Table 3: Median Age in Different Ranks across Newspapers

Figure 3

Table 4: Political Affiliation across Newspapers (%)

Figure 4

Table 5: Income Distribution in Different Types of Newspapers (%)

Figure 5

Table 6: Sources of Job Autonomy Limitation (%)

Figure 6

Table 7: Role of Media in Theory and in Practice (%)

Figure 7

Table 8: Internal Report by Different Ages (%)

Figure 8

Table 9: Opinions on Internal Reporting (%)

Figure 9

Table 10: Journalists' Attitude and Actions on Various Issues (%)

Figure 10

Table 11: Logic of Journalistic Behaviour in Hypothetical Scenarios (%)