Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:31:51.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal high-fat diet consumption during pregnancy and lactation predisposes offspring to renal and metabolic injury later in life: comparative study of diets with different lipid contents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2022

Fernanda Busnardo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Applied Structural and Cellular Biology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Jéssica Fortunato Silva
Affiliation:
Applied Structural and Cellular Biology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Helena Severino do Prado
Affiliation:
Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Marcos Luiz Ferreira-Neto
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Ana Paula Coelho Balbi*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
*
Address for correspondence: Ana Paula C. Balbi, Avenida Pará, 1720, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2A, CEP: 38400-902, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Emails: paulabalb@ufu.br; paulabalb@yahoo.com.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that maternal overnutrition can result in a higher development risk of obesity and renal disease in the offspring’s adulthood. The present study tested different lipid levels in the maternal diet during pregnancy and lactation and its repercussions on the offspring of Wistar rats. Offspring of 1, 7, 30 and 90-d-old were divided into the following groups: Control (CNT) – offspring of dams that consumed a standard chow diet (3.5% of lipids); Experimental 1 (EXP1) – offspring of dams exposed to a high-fat diet (HFD) (28% of lipids); and Experimental 2 (EXP2) – offspring of dams exposed to a HFD (40% of lipids). Regarding maternal data, there was a decrease in the amount of diet ingested by EXP2. Daily caloric intake was higher in EXP1, while protein and carbohydrate intakes were lower in EXP2. While lipid intake was higher in the experimental groups, EXP1 consumed more lipids than EXP2, despite the body weight gain being higher in EXP2. Adult offspring from EXP1 presented higher blood glucose. Regarding morphometric analysis, in both experimental groups, there was an increase in the glomerular tuft and renal corpuscle areas, but an increase in the capsular space area only in EXP1. There was a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in EXP1, in contrast to an increase in GFR of EXP2, along with an increase in urinary protein excretion. In conclusion, the maternal HFDs caused significant kidney damage in offspring, but had different repercussions on the type and magnitude of recorded change.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Figure 0

Table 1. Diet composition of Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2 groups

Figure 1

Table 2. Maternal food, daily caloric, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids intake, blood glucose, weight gain and number of pups per litter of Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2 groups

Figure 2

Figure 1. Offspring body weight, blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides of Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2 groups. Offspring body weight (a), blood glucose (b), total cholesterol (c) and triglycerides (d): values are expressed as mean ± SEM (ANOVA with Newman–-Keuls pPost-tTest). Significance level: p < 0.05. ***C: p < 0.001 versus Control 30D; **C: p < 0.01 versus Control 30D; *C: p < 0.05 versus Control. Total number of animals: Control (1D = 10, 7D = 8, 30D = 11 and 90D = 11), Experimental 1 (1D = 6, 7D = 7, 30D = 7 and 90D = 8) and Experimental 2 (1D = 6, 7D = 12, 30D = 9 and 90D = 14) groups.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Offspring renal weight–body weight ratio, glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein excretion and systolic blood pressure of Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2 groups. Renal weight–body weight ratio (a): values are expressed as or median with percentiles 25 and 75. Glomerular filtration rate (b), Urinary protein excretion (c) and Systolic blood pressure (d): values are expressed as mean ± SEM (ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test). Significance level: p < 0.05. ***C: p < 0.001 versus Control; **C: p < 0.01 versus Control; *C: p < 0.05 versus Control; ***E2: p < 0.001 versus Experimental 2; ***E1: p < 0.001 versus Experimental 1; **E1: p < 0.01 versus Experimental 1. Total number of animals: Control (1D = 10, 7D = 8, 30D = 11 and 90D = 11), Experimental 1 (1D = 6, 7D = 7, 30D = 7 and 90D = 8) and Experimental 2 (1D = 6, 7D = 12, 30D = 9 and 90D = 14) groups.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Morphometrical analyses: renal corpuscle, glomerular tuft and capsular space areas of Control, Experimental 1 and Experimental 2 groups. Renal corpuscle area (a) and glomerular tuft area (b): values are expressed as mean ± SEM (ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test). Significance level: p < 0.05. Capsular space area (c): values are expressed as median with percentiles 25 and 75 (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn post-test). Significance level: p < 0.05. **C: p < 0.01 versus Control; *C: p < 0.05 versus Control. Total number of animals: Control (90D = 11), Experimental 1 (90D = 8) and Experimental 2 (90D = 14) groups.