Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:50:32.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training on hippocampal function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2020

Jin-Hyuck Park*
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan-si, Republic of Korea
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jin-Hyuck Park, Room 1401, College of Medical Science, 22 Soonchunhyang-ro, Shinchang-myeon, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do 31538, Republic of Korea. Phone: +82-41-530-4773. Email: roophy@naver.com.

Abstract

Background:

To date, there is a controversy on effects of cognitive intervention to maintain or improve hippocampal function for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Objective:

The main objective of this study was to exam effects of virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training (VR-SCT) using VR on hippocampal function of older adults with MCI.

Method:

Fifty-six older adults with MCI were randomly allocated to the experimental group (EG) that received the VR-SCT or the waitlist control group (CG) for a total of 24 sessions. To investigate effects of the VR-SCT on spatial cognition and episodic memory, the Weschsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Block Design Test (WAIS-BDT) and the Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) were used.

Results:

During the sessions, the training performances gradually increased (p < .001). After the intervention, the EG showed significant greater improvements in the WAIS-BDT (p < .001, η2 = .667) and recall of the SVLT (p < .05, η2 =.094) compared to the CG but in recognition of the SVLT (p > .05, η2 =.001).

Conclusion:

These results suggest that the VR-SCT might be clinically beneficial to enhance spatial cognition and episodic memory of older adults with MCI.

Information

Type
Original Research Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. Flow diagram of subjects in this study.

Figure 1

Table 1. General characteristics of subjects (N = 56)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Distance error of every session.

Figure 3

Table 2. Changes in hippocampal function (N = 56)