Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:20:43.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is strain echocardiography a more sensitive indicator of myocardial involvement in patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with SARS-CoV-2?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2022

Eviç Z. Başar*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Emre Usta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Gökmen Akgün
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Health Science, Darıca Farabi Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
Hüseyin S. Güngör
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Hafize E. Sönmez
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Kadir Babaoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Asist. Prof. Dr E. Z. Başar, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey. Tel: +905074630082; Fax: +902623037003. E-mail: evicbasar@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the early myocardial dysfunction detected by strain echocardiography in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted with 47 patients diagnosed with MIS-C and 32 healthy age- and gender-matched children. All patients underwent two-dimensional, colour, pulsed, and tissue Doppler, and 2D speckle tracking echocardiography examination at admission, 2 weeks, and 2 months after discharge. The MIS-C patient group was compared with the control group. Echocardiographic changes in MIS-C patients during follow-up were evaluated.

Results:

Of 47 patients, 30 (63.8%) were male and 17 (36.2%) were female. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.1 ± 4.3 (1.25–17) years. At admission, 25 patients had abnormal findings on conventional echocardiography. Among them, eight patients had left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ejection fraction and fractional shortening were significantly lower in the patient group at admission compared to controls (p = 0.013, p = 0.010, respectively). While the ejection fraction was <55% in eight patients, and global longitudinal strain was lower than −2SD in 29 patients at admission. Global longitudinal strain z-score <−2SD persisted in 13 patients at 2-month follow-up. Ejection fraction increased above 55% in 3.42 ± 0.53 days in 7 of 8 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ejection fraction was 51% at discharge in one patient, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction persisted at the 6-month of follow-up.

Conclusion:

These results confirmed that speckle tracking echocardiography is more likely to detect subclinical myocardial damage compared to conventional echocardiography. In addition, it is a valuable method for follow-up in this patient group.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of left ventricle segmental longitudinal strains.

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of left ventricle segmental longitudinal strains in MIS-C patients at admission, at the second week, and at the second-month control visits.

Figure 2

Table 3. Comparison of segmental circumferential strain and radial strain.

Figure 3

Table 4. Segmental circumferential strain and radial strain in MIS-C patients at admission, at the second week, and at the second-month control visit compared to controls.

Figure 4

Table 5. Comparison of global strains, twist, apical rotation, and basal rotation between MIS-C patients at admission, at the second-month follow-up of the patients and controls.

Figure 5

Table 6. Comparison of global strains, twist, apical rotation and basal rotation in MIS-C patients at admission, at the second week, and at the second-month control visit.

Figure 6

Figure 1. Patient 1: While the global longitudinal strain was mildly impaired (global longitudinal strain −16%) at admission (1A), it increased during the follow-up and returned to normal limits at discharge (1B). (1A: admission, 1B: discharge, 1C: 2 weeks of follow-up, 1D: 2 months of follow-up). Patient 2: The global longitudinal strain was impaired on admission (2A) and still not in the normal range at discharge (2B global longitudinal strain: −14%). During the follow-up, global longitudinal strain increased and returned to normal limits at the end of the 2-month follow-up (2A: admission, 2B: at discharge, 2C: second week of follow-up, 2D: second month of follow-up). Patient 3: Global longitudinal strain −15.2% was detected in Patient 3 at admission. At the 12th hour of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, the patient was taken to the ICU because of deterioration in his general condition. Figure (3B) showed the bulls-eye plot of the patient in the ICU. At discharge (3C), improvement in global longitudinal strain was observed. At the second month of follow-up (3D), the global longitudinal strain was found to be within normal limits (3A: admission, 3B: second day of admission, 3C: second week of follow-up, 3D: second month of follow-up). Patient 4: While the global longitudinal strain was severely impaired (Global longitudinal strain −5.4%) at admission (4A), it was observed that the global longitudinal strain showed rapid improvement during follow-up and returned to normal limits by the second month (4D). (4A: admission, 4B: discharge, 4C: second week of follow-up, 4D: second month of follow-up).

Supplementary material: File

Başar et al. supplementary material

Table S2
Download Başar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Başar et al. supplementary material

Table S1
Download Başar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18 KB
Supplementary material: File

Başar et al. supplementary material

Table S3
Download Başar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.4 KB