Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:58:21.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Sn grain structure on the electromigration of Sn–Ag solder joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2012

Yiwei Wang
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758
Kuan H. Lu
Affiliation:
Intel Corp., Chandler, AZ 85226
Vikas Gupta
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, Texas 75243
Leon Stiborek
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, Texas 75243
Dwayne Shirley
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, Texas 75243
Seung-Hyun Chae
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, Texas 75243
Jay Im
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758
Paul S. Ho*
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: paulho@mail.utexas.edu

Abstract

In this article, we investigated the effect of Sn grain structure on the electromigration (EM) reliability of Sn–2.5Ag (wt%) solder joints used in flip-chip packages. The electron backscattering diffraction technique was applied to characterize the Sn grain size and orientation of the solder joints. Failure analyses on Sn–2.5Ag solder joints after EM tests showed that the Sn grain structure was important in controlling the kinetics of the intermetallic compound growth and void formation under EM. Further microstructural analysis revealed that the grain sizes and orientations of the solder joints after multiple solder reflows were statistically different from those with a single solder reflow and resulted in an improved EM reliability. Thermal annealing effect was also investigated to separate the thermal effect from the EM-induced effect. Results obtained in this study demonstrated that EM reliability of Pb-free solder joints could be improved by optimization of the Sn grain structure.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. An illustration on the Wheatstone bridge method to track resistance change in solder joints during electromigration (EM) tests.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Change of the voltage across the Wheatstone bridge (Vg) versus EM test time of three test vehicles.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Backscattered scanning electron microscopy (BS-SEM) image of a pair of cross-sectioned solder joints after EM testing.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Cross-sectional analysis of an early failed solder joint, which failed after 237 h of current stressing. Test condition: 5.57 × 104A/cm2, 158 °C. (a) BS-SEM image and (b) Electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) inverse pole image of the Sn grain with c-axis alignment illustration.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Cross-sectional analysis of a late failed solder joint, which failed after 924 h of current stressing. Test condition: 5.57 × 104A/cm2, 158 °C. (a) BS-SEM image and (b) EBSD inverse pole image of Sn grains with c-axis alignment illustrations.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Cross-sectional analysis of a surviving solder joint, which did not fail after 1295 h of current stressing. Test condition: 5.57 × 104A/cm2, 158 °C. (a) BS-SEM image and (b) EBSD inverse pole image of Sn grains with c-axis alignment illustrations.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. EBSD mappings of pristine solder joints subjected to a single solder reflow process.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Cyclic twin structures appeared in solder joints subjected to a single solder reflow during assembly: (a) EBSD mapping and (b) (001) pole figure projected on the Wulff net.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. EBSD mappings of pristine solder joints subjected to four additional reflow processes.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Grain size histogram for pristine solder joints with single or multiple reflows.

Figure 10

FIG. 11. Misorientation histogram for pristine solder joints with single or multiple reflows.

Figure 11

FIG. 12. EBSD mappings of solder joints after 450 h of thermal annealing under 150 °C. Solder joints were from the group of single reflow.

Figure 12

FIG. 13. EBSD mappings of solder joints after 450 h of thermal annealing under 150 °C. Solder joints were from the group of multiple reflows.

Figure 13

FIG. 14. Grain size histogram for solder joints after 450 h of thermal annealing under 150 °C. Groups with single or multiple reflows were compared.

Figure 14

FIG. 15. Misorientation histogram for solder joints after 450 h of thermal annealing under 150 °C. Groups with single or multiple reflows were compared.

Figure 15

FIG. 16. A collection of EBSD mappings of EM tested solder joints. (a)–(c) were solder joints from the group of single reflow, while (d)–(f) were solder joints subjected to multiple reflows. (a, d) Early failures, (b, e) late failures, and (c, f) survivors.

Figure 16

TABLE I. Results of angles between the c-axis of the Sn grain and the electromigration flow direction based on an area weighted average calculation for solder joints shown in Fig. 16.

Figure 17

FIG. 17. Statistical distribution for EM lifetime for solder joints with and without four additional reflows.

Figure 18

TABLE II. Summary of the experimental matrix and electromigration statistical results.