Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T00:51:47.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of periodical articles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

Gervase Rosser
Affiliation:
St Catherine's College, Oxford, OX1 3UJ
Mark Jenner
Affiliation:
Dept of History, University of York, Heslington, York, YO1 5DD
Bill Luckin
Affiliation:
Division of Humanities, Bolton Institute of Higher Education, Bolton, BL2 1JW
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

One of the attractions of medieval urban history is the fact that major conceptual problems in the field continue to be debated. In a stimulating review article by J.H. Mundy, ’Philip Jones and the medieval Italian city-state‘, J. of European Economic History, 28 (1999), 185–200, one distinguished scholar is taxed for holding views now dismissed by some, but of which he is by no means a unique surviving representative. One of these views assumes a clear distinction between the antique city, supposedly a bureaucratic centre with limited economic functions, and the medieval city, as the home of industrious artisans and nascent capitalism. The image of the non-profit-making ancient town may be overly indebted to the nature of the literary sources and to the prevalent interests of classicists; but, although many would now agree that both the elements in the above equation need qualifying, a more focused comparison is presently lacking, and a fine book is still waiting to be written on the transition from the ancient world to the middle ages in urban history.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press