Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:59:35.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and tensile properties of in situ Mg2Sip/AM60B composite prepared by thixoforging technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Suqing Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
Tijun Chen*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
Pubo Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: chentj@lut.cn

Abstract

The thixoforging technology has been proved as an effective method to fabricate the in situ Mg2Sip/AM60B composite with excellent performances. The effects of reheating temperature on microstructure and tensile properties have been investigated. The results indicate that the liquid amount, the solubility of Al in α-Mg particles, and the coarsening of the α-Mg particles are changed as the reheating temperature changes, and thus the subsequent solidification behavior and plastic deformation are thereby changed. The morphology of the Mg2Si particle also varies as the reheating temperature rises owing to partial remelting operating in the edges and corners of the particles. The best ultimate tensile strength and elongation of 209 MPa and 11.9% of the thixoforged composite, which are 93 and 138% higher than the traditional permanent mold casting respectively, are obtained under the reheating temperature of 600 °C.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Schematic of the tensile testing specimen.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Microstructures of the composites: (a) as-cast, (b) partial remelted at 600 °C for 60 min and (c) thixoforged condition.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Central microstructure of the composite thixoforged at different temperatures for 60 min: (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Microstructures in the edge of the composite thixoforged at different temperatures for 60 min: (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Variations of the average size and number for the spots in the center and edge with reheating temperatures.

Figure 5

TABLE I. Compositions of the primary α-Mg particles of the composites thixoforged under different reheating temperatures.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. SEM images of the composite thixoforged under temperatures of: (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Variations of the eutectic β phase amount with reheating temperatures.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. SEM images shown Mg2Si particles thixoforged under temperatures of: (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. OM micrographs of the composites thixoforged under different temperatures and then annealed at 430 °C for 60 min: (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 10

FIG. 10. Variations of UTS and elongation with reheating temperatures.

Figure 11

FIG. 11. Fractographs of the composites thixoforged under reheating temperatures of (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 12

FIG. 12. Side views of the fracture surface of the composites thixoforged under reheating temperatures of (a) 585 °C, (b) 595 °C, (c) 600 °C, and (d) 610 °C.

Figure 13

FIG. 13. The SEM images show the Mg2Si particles on the fracture surface of the composites thixoforged under reheating temperatures of: (a) 585 °C, (b) and (c) 600 °C, (d) 635 °C.