Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:25:39.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and validation of four Leishmania species constitutively expressing GFP protein. A model for drug discovery and disease pathogenesis studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

ASHA PARBHU PATEL
Affiliation:
School of Science, University of Greenwich at Medway, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK
ANDREW DEACON
Affiliation:
School of Science, University of Greenwich at Medway, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK
GIULIA GETTI*
Affiliation:
School of Science, University of Greenwich at Medway, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK
*
* Corresponding author: School of Science, University of Greenwich at Medway, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK. E-mail: G.t.m.getti@gre.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-parasite transfectants have been widely used as a tool for studying disease pathogenesis in several protozoan models and their application in drug screening assays has increased rapidly. In the past decade, the expression of GFP has been established in several Leishmania species, mostly for in vitro studies. The current work reports generation of four transgenic parasites constitutively expressing GFP (Leishmania mexicana, Leishmania aethiopica, Leishmania tropica and Leishmania major) and their validation as a representative model of infection. This is the first report where stable expression of GFP has been achieved in L. aethiopica and L. tropica. Integration of GFP was accomplished through homologous recombination of the expression construct, pRib1.2αNEOαGFP downstream of the 18S rRNA promoter in all species. A homogeneous and high level expression of GFP was detected in both the promastigote and the intracellular amastigote stages. All transgenic species showed the same growth pattern, ability to infect mammalian host cells and sensitivity to reference drugs as their wild type counterparts. All four transgenic Leishmania are confirmed as models for in vitro and possibly in vivo infections and represent an ideal tool for medium throughput testing of compound libraries.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Detection of GFP expression in transgenic parasites by epi-fluorescence microscopy; fluorescent microscopic images show expression of GFP in transfected L. tropica (before (A) and after (B) glinting of fluorescence) and in L. aethiopica (before (C) and after (D) glinting of fluorescence) during logarithmic phase of growth. Bright field images (A and C) for each species are shown to represent same field view. Bright field images of infected THP-1 cells were overlapped with corresponding FITC images; intracellular parasites were clearly visible 48 h following infection with (E) GFP-expressing L. tropica-GFP and (F) L. aethiopica-GFP. All images were captured under a 60× oil immersion lens.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Flow cytometry analysis of GFP expressing parasites. (A) Extracellular promastigotes of L. tropica-GFP and L. aethiopica -GFP at logarithmic phase of growth. The figure shows two samples overlapping. Black histogram represents non-transfected parasites and red histogram show homogeneous population of transfected parasites. Over 98% of transfected parasites show high expression of GFP; (B) THP-1 cells following 24 h infection with L. tropica-GFP and L. aethiopica -GFP. The first peak represents THP-1 cells not affected by presence of GFP expressing parasites, therefore considered uninfected; the second peak represents THP-1 cells showing high degree of fluorescence therefore considered infected with GFP-expressing parasites, the two populations are clearly distinguishable.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Western blot analysis of GFP expression in represented clones of (A) L. mexicana-GFP (clones 2, 3, 4 and 5); (B)L. aethiopica-GFP (clones 2, 3, 4 and 5); (C) L. tropica-GFP (clones 2, 3, 4 and 5); and (D) L. major-GFP (clone 2). Arrows on the right-hand side indicates the molecular weight of GFP (27 kDa).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Top: A schematic representation of GFP integration mediated by the pRib1.2αNeoαGFP vector construct at the 18S rRNA locus downstream of the DNA Pol I-driven promoter in the parasite genome. Bottom: PCR analysis to confirm integration of the full length GFP gene (panel A and B) present at the 18 s ribosomal locus (panel C and D) of Leishmania species. In panel A, lane M: 1 kB plus marker; lane 1: L. mexicana; lanes 2–5: L. mexicana-GFP clones; lane 6: L. major and lane 7: L. major-GFP clone. In panel B, lane M: 1 kB plus marker; lane 1: L. aethiopica; lanes 2–5: L. aethiopica-GFP clones; lane 6: L. tropica; and lanes 7–10: L. tropica-GFP clones. In panel C, lane M: 1 kB marker; lane 1: L. mexicana; lanes 2–5: L. mexicana-GFP clones; second lane M: 1 kB marker, lane 6: L. major and lane 7: L. major-GFP clone. In panel D, lane M: 1 kB marker; lane 1: L. aethiopica; lanes 2–5 L. aethiopica-GFP clones; lane 6: L. tropica and lanes 7–10: L. tropica-GFP clones.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Extracellular and intracellular growth of GFP-expressing parasites. (A) Growth curve of GFP-expressing L. tropica and L. aethiopica promastigotes carried over 8 days. Results are the mean (±s.e.m.) of three independent experiments. (B) Time course of infection in THP-1 cells of GFP-expressing Leishmania species over a period of 96 h, determined by fluorescence microscopy (results are the mean [±s.e.m.] of three independent experiments for GFP-expressing L. tropica and four independent experiments for GFP-expressing L. aethiopica) and flow cytometry (results are the mean [±s.e.m.] of three independent experiments; where not shown, error bars fall within the symbols).

Figure 5

Table 1. IC50 values of antileishmanial reference drugs against extracellular promastigote stage of L. mexicana-GFP, L. aethiopica-GFP, L. tropica-GFP and L. major-GFP and the correspondent wild type. Unpaired t-test coupled with Mann–Whitney U test of the IC50 between each of the wild type parasites and their transgenic counterpart showed no significant difference (P>0·1). Lower part, IC50 values of antileishmanial reference drugs against intracellular amastigotes stage of L. mexicana-GFP, L. aethiopica-GFP, L. tropica-GFP and L. major-GFP. Extracellular parasites were treated for 24 h; Intracellular parasites were treated for 24 and 72 h post infection. Results are the mean (±s.e.m.) of three independent experiments

Supplementary material: PDF

Patel et al. Supplementary Material

Figure

Download Patel et al. Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 140 KB
Supplementary material: File

Patel et al. Supplementary Material

Figure

Download Patel et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 634.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Patel et al. Supplementary Material

Figure

Download Patel et al. Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 139.9 KB