Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:09:41.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are the effects of hunger stage-specific? A case study in an aphidophagous ladybird beetle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Priya Singh
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
Geetanjali Mishra
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow-226007, India
*
Author for correspondence: Omkar, Email: omkar.lkouniv@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Food availability is a fundamental factor determining an animal's potential fitness. Carry-over effects of food limitation from development to adulthood are known to influence reproduction, ageing, and tolerance to stress. We have examined the effect of stage-specific variation (before adult emergence or pre-emergence, post-emergence and post-mating) in food availability in Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Larvae were reared separately on two different pre-emergence food regimes (abundant or restricted) until pupation. Newly emerged adults were further split into two groups and placed on abundant or restricted post-emergence regimes. After mating, females were split and reared on any one of two post-mating regimes. The results revealed that: (i) time to commence mating declined with increased food availability in pre- and post-emergence stages, (ii) mating duration increased with food availability post-emergence, (iii) highest reproduction output was observed in individuals who had abundant food pre- and post-emergence. However, food availability at the time of oviposition also had a strong influence on fecundity. Solo bouts of scarcity, regardless of which stage suffered them, were effectively managed in at least two of the three stages (pre-emergence, post-emergence, post-mating) had abundant food.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Effect of pre- and post-emergence food regime on mating behaviour (a) time to commence mating (TCM), (b) latent period (LP), (c) mating duration (MD) in P. dissecta. Values are Mean ± SE. Small letters denote the comparison of means across all the treatments while capital letters denote within post-emergence food regime or across the same pre-emergence food regime respectively. Similar letters indicate a lack of significant difference between the mating pairs at P > 0.05. * In food regime treatments mentioned on X-axis the first letter indicates pre-emergence food regime (from egg hatching until pupation), while the second letter denotes post-emergence food regime (from adult emergence until adult maturity).

Figure 1

Table 1. Showing the effect of pre- and post-emergence food regime on mating parameters and their interactions

Figure 2

Figure 2. Effect of pre-, post-emergence and post-mating food regime on reproductive output (a) Fecundity (b) % fertility in P. dissecta. Values are Mean ± SE. Small letters denote the comparison of means across all the treatment respectively. Similar letters indicate a lack of significant difference between the mating pairs at P > 0.05. * In food regime treatments mentioned on X-axis the first letter indicates pre-emergence food regime (from egg hatching until pupation), while the second letter denotes post-emergence food regime (from adult emergence until adult maturity) and third letters indicate post-mating (food regime after mating).

Figure 3

Table 2. The result of Generalized Linear Model with the factors pre-, post-emergence and post-mating food regime showing their effects on fecundity and % fertility