Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:05:22.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marine geological investigation of Edward VIII Gulf, Kemp Coast, East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2020

Isabel A. Dove*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA
Amy Leventer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA
Meredith J. Metcalf
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Earth Science, Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT 06226, USA
Stefanie A. Brachfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
Robert B. Dunbar
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Patricia Manley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA
Amelia E. Shevenell
Affiliation:
College of Marine Sciences, University of South Florida, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
Richard W. Murray
Affiliation:
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
Matthew Hommeyer
Affiliation:
College of Marine Sciences, University of South Florida, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
Kelly A. Kryc
Affiliation:
Anderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA
Natalie McLenaghan
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Springs, MD 20910, USA
Fiona Taylor
Affiliation:
College of Sciences and Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
Bruce A. Huber
Affiliation:
Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY 10964, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A physical oceanographic, geophysical and marine geological survey of Edward VIII Gulf, Kemp Coast, collected data from conductivity–temperature–depth casts, multi-beam bathymetric swath mapping and 3.5 kHz sub-bottom surveying. Modified circumpolar deep water (mCDW) is observed in Edward VIII Gulf, as well as notable bathymetric features including mega-scale glacial lineations and a 1750 m-deep trough. Sedimentological, geochemical, rock-magnetic and micropalaeontological analysis of two kasten cores document regional palaeoclimate and palaeo-oceanographic conditions over the past 8000 years, with a warm period occurring from c. 8 to 4 ka and a shift to cooler conditions beginning at c. 4 ka and persisting until at least 0.9 ka. Sediment packages > 40 m thick within deep troughs in Edward VIII Gulf present potential targets for higher-resolution Holocene and deglacial climate studies. Despite the presence of mCDW on the shelf, inland bed topography consisting of highland terrain suggests the likelihood of relative stability of this sector of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Core locations, glacier systems around Edward VIII Gulf, swath map and inferred directions of past ice-sheet advance. Reference elevation model of Antarctica from Howat et al. (2019). a. Bed elevation (from Fretwell et al.2013) and b. the shelf break (from Arndt et al.2013). The study area in c. is indicated by the solid black box in a. Locations referenced in paper include AB = Adélie Basin, ASB = Aurora subglacial basin, IA = Iceberg Alley, LG = Lambert Graben, MNT = Mertz–Ninnis Trough, NB = Nielsen Basin, SC = Svenner Channel, WSB = Wilkes subglacial basin.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Conductivity–temperature–depth data from a. station 49 and b. station 50.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Multi-beam swath map and cross-sectional profiles of bathymetric features in Edward VIII Gulf. Study area indicated by red box. EL = Enderby Land, KL = Kemp Land, LHB = Lützow-Holm Bay, MRL = Mac. Robertson Land, PB = Prydz Bay, QML = Queen Maud Land.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Sub-bottom profiles from a. site 49 and b. site 50. Scale shows the relation of two-way travel time in milliseconds (TTWT) to sediment thickness assuming a speed of sound of 1600 m s-1.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Lithology columns and photographs of cores NBP01-01 KC49 and JKC50. Depth in centimetres below sea floor. Black bars along the lithology columns correspond to photographs of a. bioturbated diatom-rich mud from 0 to 40 cm in KC49 and b. laminated diatom ooze from 240 to 260 cm and bioturbated diatom-rich mud from 260 to 280 cm in JKC50.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Age-depth models for cores NBP01-01 a. KC49 and b. JKC50. Grey clouds display the 95% confidence limits of the modelled ages.

Figure 6

Table I. Radiocarbon dates from cores NBP01-01 KC49 and JKC50.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Magnetic susceptibility (χ), magnetic grain-size (MR/MS) and bulk grain-size cumulative percentage for KC49 and JKC50. Geochemical data for JKC50 include Al- and Ti-based calculations for wt% terrigenous material, wt% biogenic silica (BSi), Ba/Al and Al/Ti for JKC50.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Diatom absolute abundance and assemblage data for cores KC49 and JKC50. mv/gds = millions of valves per gram of dry sediment.