Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:25:43.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective streptavidin bioconjugation on silicon and silicon carbide nanowires for biosensor applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2012

Elissa H. Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030; and Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
John A. Schreifels
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Mulpuri V. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Albert V. Davydov*
Affiliation:
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Vladimir P. Oleshko
Affiliation:
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Nancy J. Lin
Affiliation:
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Kristen L. Steffens
Affiliation:
Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Sergiy Krylyuk
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; and Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Kris A. Bertness
Affiliation:
Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
Amy K. Manocchi
Affiliation:
Sensors and Electronic Devices Directorate, Army Research Lab, Adelphi, Maryland 20783
Yaroslav Koshka
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: ewilliah@gmu.edu

Abstract

A functionalization method for the specific and selective immobilization of the streptavidin (SA) protein on semiconductor nanowires (NWs) was developed. Silicon (Si) and silicon carbide (SiC) NWs were functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and subsequently biotinylated for the conjugation of SA. Existence of a thin native oxide shell on both Si and SiC NWs enabled efficient binding of APTES with the successive attachment of biotin and SA as was confirmed with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated nonspecific, electrostatic binding of the SA and the bovine serum albumin (BSA) proteins to APTES-coated NWs. Inhibition of nonspecific BSA binding and enhancement of selective SA binding were achieved on biotinylated NWs. The biofunctionalized NWs have the potential to be used as biosensing platforms for the specific and selective detection of proteins.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Cross-section FESEM image of Si NWs grown on a Si(111) substrate and (b) plan-view FESEM image of 3C-SiC NWs grown on a 4H-SiC(0001) substrate. Corresponding high-magnification images of individual NW tips are shown in the insets [note solidified Au and Ni catalytic metal caps atop Si and SiC NWs in the (a) and (b) insets, respectively].

Figure 1

SCHEME 1. Streptavidin (SA) and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) binding to APTES-coated NWs. Note: Amino groups on the NW surface after APTES functionalization exists in a NH3+ and a hydrogen-bonded (NH2---H) form as well as free NH2 groups. Only NH3+ groups are shown in the schematic to emphasize the possibility of electrostatic binding of proteins to the APTES-functionalized NW surface.

Figure 2

SCHEME 2. Streptavidin (SA) binding and inhibition of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) binding to biotinylated NWs. Note: Unlike Scheme 1, the NH3+/NH2---H forms of the APTES amino groups are not included in the schematic to illustrate the mechanism for the specific binding of SA after biotinylation.

Figure 3

FIG. 2. XPS spectra of Si NWs: (a) as-grown; (b) APTES-coated; (c) biotinylated; and (d) SA immobilized. The upper-left inset shows the N 1s peaks from NH3+/NH2---H (401.5 eV) and NH2 (399.8 eV) after APTES functionalization; the upper-right inset shows the S 2p peaks after biotinylation; and the upper-center inset shows the C 1s signal related to SA conjugation. Note: the S 2p peak is riding on the slope of the Si 2s energy loss peak and is not discernible in the survey scans but becomes clear in the high-resolution narrow scans. Also, trace amounts of Na, P, and K observed in some spectra can be attributed to residual phosphate buffer.

Figure 4

FIG. 3. XPS spectra of SiC NWs: (a) as-grown; (b) APTES-coated; (c) biotinylated; and (d) SA immobilized. The upper-left inset shows the C 1s peaks from the as-grown SiC NWs; the second from left inset shows the N 1s peaks from NH3+/NH2---H and NH2 after APTES functionalization; the next inset shows the S 2p peaks after biotinylation; and the right-most inset shows the C 1s signal related to SA conjugation. Note: same as in the Si NW case, the S 2p peak is riding on the slope of the Si 2s energy loss peak, which becomes clear in the high-resolution narrow scans. Also, trace amounts of Na, P, and K observed in some spectra can be attributed to residual phosphate buffer.

Figure 5

FIG. 4. Bright-field HRTEM images of near-edge regions of: (a) as-grown Si NW with native oxide layer; (b) APTES-coated Si NW; (c) biotinylated Si NW; and (d) fully functionalized Si NW. The 0.32 nm Si {111} lattice fringes in (a–c) indicate the <111> growth direction of the Si NW. White dashed lines help guide the eye and mark the interface between the NW edge and the amorphous outer layers (native SiOx and/or organic layers). Noteworthy, with the organic layer accumulation, the interface between the edge of the NW and the deposited organic layers, as well as the Si lattice fringes, become barely visible. Region (1) in (a) refers to the oxide layer; region (2) in (b) is the oxide/APTES layer; region (3) in (c) represents the oxide/APTES/biotin layer; and region (4) in (d) is the oxide/APTES/biotin/SA layer. The scale bars are 5 nm.

Figure 6

FIG. 5. HRTEM images of near-edge regions of SiC NWs coated with: (a) native oxide layer [region (1)]; (b) APTES [layer (2)]; (c) APTES/biotin [layer (3)]; and (d) APTES/biotin/SA [layer (4)]. White dashed eye-guiding lines mark the interface between the NW edge and the amorphous oxide and organic layers. The 0.25 nm SiC {111} lattice fringes (labeled in a) indicate the <111> growth direction of the 3C-polytype SiC NWs in agreement with our previous results.12 Note the high density of the {111} stacking faults in 3C-SiC that are aligned 20° to the NW axis [clearly visible in (a) and (d) and described in Ref. 12]. The scale bars are 5 nm.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. AFM images with corresponding line scans of: (a1–a3) an as-grown Si NW; (b1–b3) an APTES-coated Si NW; (c1–c3) a biotinylated Si NW; and (d1–d3) a SA immobilized Si NW. For (a1–d1) the X–Y length scale bar in (a1) applies to all four images; the vertical bar on the right is the color-coded 200 nm Z-scale. For (a2–d2) the line scans, taken perpendicular to the NW growth axis, show the NW cross-sectional morphologies; the inscribed dash-lined hexagons represent a schematic cross-section of the as-grown Si NW with an average diameter of 125 nm. For (a3–d3) the 300 nm long line scans, taken along the NW growth axis, show typical top surface roughness after each functionalization step.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. AFM images with corresponding line scans of: (A1–A3) an as-grown SiC NW; (B1–B3) an APTES-coated SiC NW; (C1–C3) a biotinylated SiC NW; and (D1–D3) a SA immobilized SiC NW. For (A1–D1) the X–Y length scale bar in (A1) applies to all four images; the vertical bar on the right is the color-coded 170 nm Z-scale. For (A2–D2) the line scans, taken perpendicular to the NW axis, show the NW cross-sectional morphologies. For (A3–D3) the 300 nm long line scans, taken along the NW growth axis, show typical top surface morphology after each functionalization step.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Fluorescence microscopy images of APTES-coated and biotinylated Si and SiC NWs after exposure to the SA/BSA mixture. For the APTES-coated samples (columns 1 and 2), the same NW of each material is imaged for the red (SA) and green (BSA) fluorescence, respectively. Likewise, columns 3 and 4 show the response from the same biotinylated NW of each kind. The dashed ovals in column 4 mark the locations of nonfluorescing NWs, confirming the absence of nonspecific BSA attachment. The 3 μm scale bar in the upper-right square applies to all images.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. Fluorescence intensity line profiles for the (a) SA and (b) BSA proteins taken across as-grown, APTES-functionalized, and biotinylated SiC NWs after exposure to the SA/BSA mixture. The line profiles correspond to the NWs shown in the bottom row of Fig. 8 (except for the as-grown NWs).