Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:12:48.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical flow simulation at local parts of Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

K. Grosfeld
Affiliation:
Institute fiir Geophysik, Forschungsstelle fiir physikalische GLaziologie der Westfailischen Wilhelms-Universitat Miinster, D-48149 Miinster, Germany
F. Thyssen
Affiliation:
Institute fiir Geophysik, Forschungsstelle fiir physikalische GLaziologie der Westfailischen Wilhelms-Universitat Miinster, D-48149 Miinster, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Munster radio-echo-sounding (RES) work in the central part ofFilchner-Ronne Ice Shelf has revealed new information. Different signatures arediscernible in the airborne RES data. Local model calculations in the area betweenHenry Ice Rise and Berkner Island are used to interpret these signatures in terms ofthermal and dynamic parameters. From our airborne measurements, the shapes of themeteoric and marine-ice layers were prepared as input data for dynamic-modelcalculations. A general increase in the temperature-dependent flow parameter iscompared vvith a spatially variable flow parameter that is derived from modelcalculations concerning freezing and melting processes. Velocity and strain fields werecalculated by a finite-difierence method on a local data base between Henry Ice Riseand Berkner Island.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1994
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Flowlines for the thermal modeling, geodetic points (Moller and others 1992)and location of the data base for local dynamic model calculations (rectangular box in middle of figure). The disturbed ice is marked with a dotted field (map from (Swithinbank and others 1988).

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Velocities in m a 1 of regional calculation for the boundary values (map from Swithinbank and others, 1988).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Data bases of (a) ice thickness H (m), (b) marine-ice thickness H marinp (m) (Thyssen and others, 1993) and (c) flow parameter (x 10 18 Pa 3 a 1).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Velucities in mal of calculation with (a) A(T(x,y »(Fig. 3c), (b) constant-flow parameter qf 7.5 x 10-18pa-3 a-1, (C) difference between (a) and (b).

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Prinripal strain rates e1 (a -1) of calculation with (a) A(T(x, y))(Fig. 3c), (b) constant-flow parameter of 7.5 x 10-18pa 3 a-1, (c) difference between (a) and (b).

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Vertical strain rates ϵzz (a-1) of calculation with (a) A(T(x, y)) (Fig. 3c), (b) constant-jlow parameter of 7.5 x 10 18 Pa3a-1, (c) difference between (a) and (b).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Near-surface stress component σ1 (kPa) 0f calculation with (a) constant-flow parameter of 7.5 x 10 -18 Pa-3a 1, (b) A(T(x, y)) (Fig. 3c), (c) difference between (a) and (b).