Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:35:54.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SYSTEMATIC AND ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SEED COAT MORPHOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICAN CAMPANULACEAE SENSU STRICTO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

C. N. Cupido
Affiliation:
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa. E-mail: c.cupido@sanbi.org.za
W. M. M. Eddie
Affiliation:
Office of Lifelong Learning, University of Edinburgh, 11 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, Scotland, UK. E-mail: weddie1@staffmail.ed.ac.uk
L. R. Tiedt
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Electron Microscopy, University of the North West, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa. E-mail: louwrens.tiedt@nwu.ac.za

Abstract

The seed coat morphology of 50 species of Campanulaceae sensu stricto, representing all 10 South African genera, was studied by scanning electron microscopy to gauge its usefulness in the diagnosis of genera or to support clades. Possible correlations with life form (annual, herbaceous and woody perennial) and ecological requirements such as fire response, rainfall requirements, bedrock and soil preferences, as well as habitat (e.g. fynbos, strandveld, renosterveld, grassland and karoo), were also investigated. Patterns of variation are described and interpreted as conforming to two seed coat types: reticulate (Type 1) and striate/wavy (Type 2). Type 1 seeds are further divided into eight subtypes. Some general trends emerged; for example, Type 1 seeds occur in all major clades of wahlenbergioids, Type 1A with a smooth coarsely reticulate surface being predominant in fynbos taxa, all of which are woody perennials. Several of the Type 1 seeds, together with Type 2 seeds, also occur in species with wider ecological amplitude, for example in karoo, strandveld or montane grasslands. In Siphocodon there is remarkable disparity in seed type between species. These variations in seed type generally appear to accord with current knowledge of climatic changes and soil evolution during the Tertiary of South Africa, and may be useful indicators of generic emergence and mosaic speciation in the major lineages of wahlenbergioids. However, it was concluded that seed coat types do not correlate closely enough with specific ecological requirements or life forms to be of unequivocal predictive value. Also, apart from Merciera and Treichelia, they are of limited use as a diagnostic character for genera, but are useful for distinguishing species.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. List of species examined, collection data and seed characteristics. Specimens are deposited at NBG and PRE

Figure 1

Table 2. Life forms and ecological parameters scored for sampled species

Figure 2

Figs 1–20. Scanning electron micrographs of selected seeds of Campanulaceae. 1 & 2: Microcodon hispidulus. 3 & 4: Prismatocarpus diffusus. 5 & 6: P. pedunculatus. 7 & 8: Roella ciliata. 9 & 10: R. secunda. 11 & 12: Theilera guthriei. 13 & 14: T. robusta. 15 & 16: Wahlenbergia fruticosa. 17 & 18: W. neorigida. 19 & 20: Craterocapsa montana. Whole seed: Figs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19 (scale bar = 500 μm). Detail of seed coat: Figs 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 (scale bar = 50 μm).

Figure 3

Figs 21–40. Scanning electron micrographs of selected seeds of Campanulaceae. 21 & 22: Wahlenbergia krebsii. 23 & 24: Merciera brevifolia. 25 & 26: M. leptoloba. 27 & 28: Microcodon glomeratus. 29 & 30: W. adpressa. 31 & 32: W. subulata. 33 & 34: W. parvifolia. 35 & 36: W. annularis. 37 & 38: W. huttonii. 39 & 40: W. procumbens. Whole seed: Figs 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39 (scale bar = 500 μm). Detail of seed coat: Figs 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40 (scale bar = 50 μm).

Figure 4

Figs 41–60. Scanning electron micrographs of selected seeds of Campanulaceae. 41 & 42: Wahlenbergia paniculata. 43 & 44: Rhigiophyllum squarrosum. 45 & 46: Prismatocarpus crispus. 47 & 48: Treichelia dodii. 49 & 50: T. longibracteata. 51 & 52: Siphocodon debilis. 53 & 54: W. acaulis. 55 & 56: W. longifolia. 57 & 58: W. ecklonii. 59 & 60: W. exilis. Whole seed: Figs 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59 (scale bar = 500 μm). Detail of seed coat: Figs 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60 (scale bar = 50 μm).

Figure 5

Figs 61–72. Scanning electron micrographs of selected seeds of Campanulaceae. 61 & 62: Wahlenbergia psammophila. 63 & 64: W. juncea. 65 & 66: W. polyantha. 67 & 68: W. suffruticosa. 69 & 70: W. capensis. 71 & 72: Siphocodon spartioides. Whole seed: Figs 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71 (scale bar = 500 μm). Detail of seed coat: Figs 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72 (scale bar = 50 μm).

Figure 6

Fig. 73. Fifty per cent majority rule consensus of trees retained in the Bayesian analysis of the combined trnL–F and ITS data sets for 72 taxa of the Campanulaceae and three Lobeliaceae (outgroup). Numbers above branches indicate posterior probability values expressed as percentages. Bootstrap values ≥ 50% are indicated below the branches.