Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:11:19.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magmatic record of the Mesozoic geology of Hainan Island and its implications for the Mesozoic tectonomagmatic evolution of SE China: effects of slab geometry and dynamics in continental tectonics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2020

Yildirim Dilek*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
Limei Tang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR, Hangzhou 310012, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yildirim Dilek, Email: dileky@miamioh.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our field-based geochemical studies of the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous granitoids on Hainan Island indicate that their magmas had different geochemical affinities, changing from alkaline in the Triassic through ocean island basalt (OIB) in the Jurassic, to calc-alkaline in the Cretaceous. We show that these changes in the geochemical affinities of the Mesozoic granitoids on Hainan and in SE China reflect different melt sources and melt evolution patterns through time. Our new geodynamic model suggests that: (1) Triassic geology was controlled by flat-slab subduction of the palaeo-Pacific plate beneath SE China. This slab dynamics resulted in strong coupling between the lower and upper plates, causing push-over tectonics and contractional deformation in SE China. Flat subduction-induced edge flow and aesthenospheric uprising led to the production of high-K granites, syenites and mafic rocks. (2) Slab foundering, accelerated subduction rates and subduction hinge retreat in the Early Jurassic caused rapid rollback of the downgoing slab. Strong decoupling of the upper and lower plates resulted in pull-away tectonics, producing extensional deformation in SE China. Decompression melting of the upwelling aesthenosphere produced OIB-type melts, which interacted with the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) to form A- and I-type granitoids. (3) Segmentation of the palaeo-Pacific plate in the Early Cretaceous resulted in steeply dipping slabs and their faster rollback, facilitating lithospheric-scale extension and oceanward migration of calc-alkaline magmatism. This extensional deformation played a significant role in the formation of metamorphic core complexes, widespread crustal melting and development of a Basin and Range-type tectonics and landscape evolution in SE China.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig 1. Simplified tectonic map of eastern and central China, Indochina and the western Pacific realm, showing the distribution of major continental blocks, suture zones, fault systems and modern trenches. Also shown, related to the topic of this paper, are latest Jurassic – Early Cretaceous metamorphic core complexes, Cretaceous clastic basins with red bed deposits, and Late Jurassic – Cretaceous bimodal volcanic sequences in eastern China. Metamorphic core complexes (listed from south to north): 1. Zhuguang–Nanxiong (102–96 Ma); 2. Wugongshan (131 Ma); 3. Yuechengling (140–120 Ma and 100–85 Ma); 4. Lushan (126 Ma); 5. Hongzhen (135–125 Ma); 6. North Dabieshan (125 Ma); 7.Wulian (135–122 Ma); 8. Liaoning (125 Ma); 9. Yiwulushan (126 Ma); 10. Kalaqin (120 Ma); 11. Yunmengshan (126 Ma); 12. Xishan (132 Ma); 13. Hohhot (125–121 Ma); 14. Yagan–Onch Hayrhan Fault (126 Ma). Abbreviations for the major fault systems: ASF – Aliaoshan Fault; CNF – Changle–Nanao Fault; FMF – Fushun–Mishan Fault; LFF – Lishui–Haifang Fault, LMSF – Longmenshan Fault; NJF – Nenjiang Fault; RRF – Red River Fault; SF – Sagaing Fault; THSF – Taihangshan Fault; YQWF – Yantai–Qingdao Wulian Fault; ZLF – Ziyun–Luodian Fault. LP – Leizhou (Liuchow) Peninsula. Data are from Faure et al. (1996), Wang et al. (2001), Lin & Wang (2006), Hall (2012), Ni et al. (2013), GW Zhang et al. (2013), Li & Li (2015), CH Xu et al. (2017) and Chu et al. (2019).

Figure 1

Fig 2. WNW–ESE-oriented lithospheric-scale tectonic cross-section, depicting the main modes of crustal and mantle deformation structures across the South China Block, extending into the Songpan Ganzi terrane in the NW and to the modern arc–continent collision zone in Taiwan and the Philippine Sea Plate in the SE. The Xuefeng Uplift Zone separates the folded and thrust-faulted Cretaceous and older sedimentary rocks of the Yangtze block (Shortened Crust) in the west from the Extended Crust of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks in the east. Geometries and locations of the main fault systems are based on seismically determined profile by Zhang et al. (2013). Other data are from XH Li (2000), Li & van der Hilst (2010), Wang & Shu (2012), Li et al. (2016), CH Xu et al. (2017), Zhang et al. (2017) and JH Li et al. (2018). Abbreviations for the major fault systems: AGF = Anxian–Guanxian Fault; AXF = Anhua–Xupu Fault; BYF = Beichuan–Yingxiu Fault; CNF = Changle–Nanao Fault; GJF = Ganjiang Fault; HLF = Hefeng–Laifeng Fault; HSF = Huayingshan Fault; HZJF = Huayuan–Zhangjiajie Fault; JSF = Jiangshan–Shaoxing Fault; LLF = Lishui–Faifang Fault; MWF = Maowan Fault; WSF = Wuchuan–Sihui Fault; ZDF = Zhenghe–Dapu Fault. Other abbreviations: LC = lower continental crust; SCLM = subcontinental lithospheric mantle; UC = upper continental crust; WSCC = Wugongshan core complex (131 Ma). Note that some of the E-dipping extensional normal faults in the eastern Yangtze Block are reactivated W-directed Triassic (?) thrust faults. Notice the significantly thinned nature of the lithosphere, particularly the middle to lower crust, in eastern Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks, and the existence of low-velocity reflectors (representing ductile shear zones and/or melt lenses) near the top of the lower crust in Cathaysia.

Figure 2

Fig 3. Simplified tectonic map of SE China, showing the distribution of major Mesozoic structural systems and granitoid groups. Data are from ZY Tian et al. (1992), Yang & Yu (1994), Li (2000), Xiao & He (2005), Jiang et al. (2006), Li et al. (2016), Wei et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2020).

Figure 3

Fig 4. Geological map of Hainan Island, depicting the distribution of main fault systems, granitoid groups and sample locations for this study. Data are from XH Li et al. (2002), Ge, (2003), Li et al. (2006), Pedoja et al. (2008), Y Hu et al. (2016), D Xu et al. (2017), Yao et al. (2017), Tian et al. (2020) and this study.

Figure 4

Fig 5. Total alkali vs SiO2 diagram for the Triassic and Cretaceous intrusive rock suites on Hainan Island (this study). FJZ = Fenjiezhou syenite. Alkaline–subalkaline boundary is from Le Bas et al. (1986).

Figure 5

Fig 6. Outcrop images of the primary intrusive relationships between the Triassic Xinglong granite and dolerite. (a–c) Xinglong granite is intrusive into the dolerite, forming jigsaw puzzle rafts of angular mafic rock pieces floating in the felsic rock, typical of magma stoping. (d) Syn-kinematic intrusion of the Xinglong granite along extensional shear zones in the dolerite.

Figure 6

Fig 7. Microphotographs of representative samples from: (a) Xinglong dolerite; (b) Xinglong granite; (c) Wanning gabbro (coarse-grained) with euhedral to subhedral and prismatic plagioclase crystals with Carlsbad–albite twins; (d) Ledong diorite; (e) Wenshi dykes; (f) Sanya dykes. Key for acronyms: Cpx – clinopyroxene; Hrb – hornblende; Qz – quartz; Pl – plagioclase. See the text for descriptions of the mineralogy and textures of these rock samples.

Figure 7

Fig 8. Outcrop images of the Cretaceous Sanya dykes with their granitic host rock (Sanya granite) and the Cretaceous Wenshi dykes with their Cretaceous red sandstone host. Sanya dykes were emplaced along NE–SW-striking extensional fractures and fault systems that show consistently top-to-the west displacement and shearing.

Figure 8

Table 1. Sr and Nd isotope ratios of the representative Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous intrusive suites in Hainan – SE China

Figure 9

Fig 9. (a) Chondrite–normalized REE diagram of representative Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous intrusions on Hainan and in SE China; (b) MORB–normalized multi–element diagram of representative Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous intrusions on Hainan and SE China. FJZ = Fenjiezhou syenite. Chondrite values are taken from Boynton (1984). MORB values are taken from Pearce (1982, 1983). Data for the following intrusions are from Triassic Sheyang syenogranite (Zhu et al.2017); Jurassic Chebu gabbro (He et al.2010; XH Li et al.2010), Zhaibei granite (XH Li et al.2010), Quannan syenite (XH Li et al.2010) and Tabei syenite (XH Li et al.2010); Cretaceous Jinjiang dykes (Z Li et al.2012), Yuebei dykes (Qi et al.2012) and Matou monzogranite (Liu et al.2014).

Figure 10

Fig 10. (a) Plot of the Sm/Yb vs La/Yb compositional variations of the Xinlong dolerite and Wanning gabbro. Melting curves are from Xu et al. (2005); (b) plot of the Sm/Yb vs La/Sm compositional variations of the Xinlong dolerite and Wanning gabbro. Melting curves are from Aldanmaz et al. (2000). DMM = depleted MORB mantle, E-MORB = enriched mantle, N-MORB = normal MORB, PM = primitive mantle, WAM = Western Anatolian mantle, gt = garnet, sp = spinel. Ticks on the melting curves indicate the same percentages of melt fractions.

Figure 11

Fig 11. Initial 87Sr/86Sr vs 143Nd/144Nd isotope diagram for the representative Mesozoic intrusive suites on Hainan and in SE China. BSE – bulk silicate earth; CA – calc-alkaline field; DM – depleted mantle; EMI – enriched mantle I; EMII – enriched mantle II; HIMU – high (238U/204Pb) mantle; LCC – lower continental crust; MORB – mid-ocean ridge basalt. Approximate fields of mantle reservoirs and MORB are from Zindler & Hart (1986); the LCC are from Escrig et al. (2004).

Figure 12

Fig 12. Tectonostratigraphy, regional geology, structural architecture, geochemical affinity – isotopic signatures, and the inferred tectonic settings of Mesozoic tectonomagmatic suites on Hainan and in SE China. Interpreted melt sources and evolution patterns are also shown. Data for the Triassic geology and magmatism are from Li (2002), Xiao & He (2005), Li et al. (2006), Li & Li (2007), Hu et al. (2017), Yao et al. (2017) and this study. Data for the Jurassic geology and magmatism are from Ge (2003), TF Yiu et al. (2017), Li et al. (2003), Jiang et al. (2006), Zhou et al. (2006), XH Li et al. (2010), Guo et al. (2012a, b), Yao et al. (2017), Wei et al. (2018), Ma et al. (2019), and this study. Data for the Cretaceous geology and magmatism are from Lapierre et al. (1997), Li (2000), Guo et al. (2012a, b), JH Li et al. (2014), YZ Yang et al. (2017), Wang et al. (2018), Gao et al. (2019b), Tao et al. (2020), D Xu et al. (2017), Wang et al. (2020) and this study.

Figure 13

Fig 13. Time–progressive tectonic evolution of Mesozoic SE China through a tectonic mode switch, controlled by slab dynamics of the downgoing palaeo-Pacific Plate and the mantle and upper plate responses to it. AP – accretionary prism; CC – continental crust; JSF – Jian Shao Fault; LM – lithospheric mantle. Data are from Xiao & He (2005), Zhou et al. (2006), Li & Li (2007), ZX Li et al. (2012), Wang et al. (2013), Zhang et al. (2013), J Li et al. (2014), JH Li et al. (2018), N Tao et al. (2019), L Tao et al. (2020), Y Wang et al. (2020) and YM Wu et al. (2020).

Figure 14

Fig 14. Geodynamic interpretation of subduction-related magmatism and its migration through time and space as a result of the slab geometry of the palaeo-Pacific (Izanagi) oceanic plate and active margin tectonics in East Asia. Broad time windows, keyed into those in Figure 13, include Early to Middle Triassic (250–240 Ma), Jurassic (180–150 Ma) and Albian–Cenomanian (110–90 Ma) in these inferred reconstructions. Outlines of the Japanese archipelago, Sakhalin Island and the Kamchatka Peninsula are provided as reference in these reconstructions. The colour difference on land: buff colour = the Asian continent bounded by the modern shorelines; yellow colour = inferred continental crust along the active continental margin of Asia during Mesozoic times. Lines I and II refer to the tectonic profiles (shown below) across SE China and NE China – SE Russia, respectively. Distributions of major magmatic provinces with their characteristic geochemical affinities are depicted schematically in each reconstruction. QDS – Qinling–Dabie Suture; SZ – Sulu Suture Zone. Major sinistral fault systems that developed inboard of the magmatic arc system during the Late Cretaceous are shown tentatively: KTSF – Korea – Taiwan Strait Fault; TLF – TanLu Fault Zone; YKF – Yongdong–Kwangju Fault. Large grey arrows show the convergence direction of the palaeo–Pacific (Izanagi) oceanic plate with respect to Eurasia. Data are from Faure & Natal’in (1992), Maruyama et al. (1997), Lee (1999), WD Sun et al. (2007), Hall (2012), ZX Li et al. (2012), Wang & Shu (2012), Egawa (2013), Zahirovic et al. (2014), Li & Li (2015), YQ Liu et al. (2015), SF Liu et al. (2017), Tang et al. (2018), Zhao et al. (2019), Y Zheng et al. (2018) and Wakita (2020). See text for discussion of the model.

Supplementary material: Image

Dilek and Tang supplementary material

Dilek and Tang supplementary material 1

Download Dilek and Tang supplementary material(Image)
Image 394.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Dilek and Tang supplementary material

Dilek and Tang supplementary material 2

Download Dilek and Tang supplementary material(Image)
Image 386.7 KB