Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:15:48.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deriving hierarchical complexity from simplistic colloidal templates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2016

Mark A. Snyder*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, USA; snyder@lehigh.edu

Abstract

Establishing strategies for high-resolution micrometer to subnanometer structural control is an essential feature of any versatile materials design paradigm. Colloidal crystal (CC) templating not only establishes tunable replica pore topologies, but interfacial- and confinement-mediated phenomena extend its impact for tailoring properties such as pore hierarchy, topological diversity, and macroscopic morphology, as well as nucleation, growth, and crystallinity. Coupled with emerging strategies for “single-pot” template-replica co-assembly and efforts to expand the accessible materials palette, CC-templating offers promise for application-driven, rational materials design.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Schematic comparing characteristic soft and hard templating scales, with “hard” templating achieved by sacrificial ordered mesoporous materials (OMMs) or colloidal crystals (CCs) comprised of either organic constituent particles (e.g., polystyrene [PS], poly(methyl methacrylate) [PMMA]), derived commonly through emulsion polymerization, or inorganic constituent nanoparticles (NPs) or microparticles synthesized, respectively, by amino acid (e.g., lysine)-mediated methods (“Lys-Sil” silica NPs) or conventional Stöber methods. (a) The access to hierarchical pores permitted by multimodal CCs comprised of (b) largely or (c) subtly disparate constituent particles, with the co-assembly of the latter yielding packing stoichiometries: AB (top) and AB2 (bottom), dictated by particle size ratio. Both (b) volumetric replication (carbon) and (d) templating of anisotropic crystal growth along CC symmetry planes (CC-dimpled gold sheets) is possible. (b) Adapted with permission from Reference 22. © 2010 Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Adapted with permission from Reference 26. © 2014 American Chemical Society. (d) Adapted with permission from Reference 27. © 2012 American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Colloidal crystal (CC)-templated control over (a–c) macroscopic morphology in three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) CeO2, with a decreasing degree of polymerization induced by decreasing the gelation temperature and time: (a) 90°C (16 h), (b) 80°C (16 h), and (c) 40°C (24 h). (d) Branching/apex formation in 3DOM Cu2O in cupric acetate buffer relative to (e) the untemplated structure, and (f) anisotropic growth of 3DOM ZnO “house of cards” along CC symmetry planes. Panels (g–h) depict mesoscale pore topology of 3DOM SiO2 derived from soft templating by (g) polymeric surfactant Pluronic P123 and (h) nonionic surfactant Brij 56, showing respective mesopore orientation parallel or perpendicular (hexagonal array) to the macropore (sacrificed template) surface, and mesostructure modulation at constraints (arrow) relative to less-confined octahedral interstices of the template (Region I). (a–c) Adapted with permission from Reference 30. © 2014 American Chemical Society. (d–e) Adapted with permission from Reference 28. © 2014 American Chemical Society. (f) Adapted with permission from Reference 31. © 2008 Royal Society of Chemistry. (g–h) Adapted with permission from Reference 34. © 2007 American Chemical Society.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Extending the colloidal crystal templating strategy to new materials and structures, including (a) three-dimensionally ordered mesoporous (3DOm) graphene replication of Fe3O4 nanoparticle (NP) superlattices and (b) interdigitated bimodal 3DOm carbon from co-assembly and processing of Lys-Sil template (removed) and glucose precursor. (c) Transmission electron microscope images of a SnO2 nanoparticle superlattice templated on the 3DOm graphene replica shown in (a), with evidence of crystalline nanoparticulate interconnectivity (arrows) and (d) superior electrochemical cycling performance (measured at a current density of 600 mA g–1) underscored by the high cycling stability and coulombic efficiency relative to the more than 70% lower specific capacity of the native 3DOm graphene template (carbon frameworks) and poor cycling stability of 13-nm SnO2 nanoparticles synthesized and assembled outside a template when tested in their native (uncoated) and carbon-coated forms. (e) Near-single-crystalline (inset) 3DOm-imprinted (3DOm-i) LTA-type zeolite scaffolded in sacrificed 3DOm carbon, and (f) a double-periodic inverse opal structure (inset, templating schematic). (a) Adapted with permission from Reference 42. © 2015 Wiley. (b) Adapted with permission from Reference 44. © 2014 American Chemical Society. (c–d) Adapted with permission from Reference 51. © 2015 Nature Publishing Group. (e) Adapted with permission from Reference 52. © 2011 American Chemical Society. (f) Adapted with permission from Reference 56. © 2013 Wiley.