Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:46:58.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sweet voice: The role of voice quality in a Japanese feminine style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Rebecca L. Starr*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore Blk AS5, 7 Arts Link, Singapore 117570rstarr@nus.edu.sg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Sweet voice’, a distinctive Japanese vocal style, illustrates the role played by voice quality as a marker of authenticity in the construction of linguistic styles. The acoustic properties and sociopragmatic functions of sweet voice, as performed by professional voice actresses, are analyzed using data from anime programs, paraphernalia, and fan discourse. Sweet voice is shown to be connected to a traditional notion of Japanese femininity, and licenses the positive use of grammatical features of Japanese Women's Language. The mature, traditional image conveyed by sweet voice contrasts with the youthful cuteness of burikko and related vocal styles, illustrating that multiple notions of femininity operate within Japanese popular culture. The interplay of voice quality and grammatical features suggests that perceptions of conscious control at different levels of language play a crucial role in social meaning. (Voice quality, Japanese, language and gender, style, authenticity)*

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1. Seiyuu and characters included in voice quality study. (Title and date of anime in parentheses; for English titles see Appendix A).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Sample spectral slice indicating H1, H2, A1, A3, 2k, and 4k.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Proportion of perceptually creaky, modal, and breathy tokens for ten sweet voice performances.

Figure 3

Table 2. Acoustic measures by phonation type, ten sweet voice performances.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Boxplot indicating range of f0 (Hz) for ten sweet voice characters (labeled by seiyuu).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Proportion of perceptually creaky, modal, and breathy tokens for nonsweet vs. sweet performances.

Figure 6

Table 3. Acoustic measures by phonation type, four nonsweet vs. sweet voice performances.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Boxplots of mean F0 for four seiyuu nonsweet (gray) vs. sweet (white) vocal styles.

Figure 8

Table 4. Selection of JWL features with number of observations in sweet and nonsweet performances.