1 Introduction
We consider the bifurcation of gravity–capillary waves propagating at the free surface of a vertically sheared current of constant vorticity when the phase and group velocities are nearly equal. In the absence of vorticity, the existence of steadily propagating solitary gravity–capillary waves on deep water was proved numerically by Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1989). Iooss & Kirchgässner (Reference Iooss and Kirchgässner1990) investigated the problem mathematically and found it was a
$1:1$
resonance phenomenon. Later on, Vanden-Broeck & Dias (Reference Vanden-Broeck and Dias1992) established the link between the numerical calculation of Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1989) and the rigorous analysis of Iooss & Kirchgässner (Reference Iooss and Kirchgässner1990). Dias, Menasce & Vanden-Broeck (Reference Dias, Menasce and Vanden-Broeck1996) investigated numerically the behaviour of these waves in arbitrary depth away from their bifurcation point. Akylas (Reference Akylas1993) and Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1993) demonstrated that gravity–capillary solitary waves occur when the phase velocity of the carrier wave is equal to the group velocity of the envelope soliton of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation. Note that the linear dispersion relation of gravity–capillary waves has a minimum in phase velocity which is equal to the group velocity. For values of the phase velocity less than this extremum the NLS equation admits envelope-soliton solutions such that the wave crests are stationary in the frame of reference of the wave envelope. Later on, steady three-dimensional gravity–capillary solitary waves have been investigated by several authors, among them Kim & Akylas (Reference Kim and Akylas2005), Milewski (Reference Milewski2005) and Parau, Vanden-Broeck & Cooker (Reference Parau, Vanden-Broeck and Cooker2005).
Gravity–capillary solitary waves have been observed experimentally in wind waves generated in a wind wave facility by Zhang & Cox (Reference Zhang and Cox1994). During laboratory experiments (Zhang Reference Zhang1995) and field experiments (Zhang Reference Zhang1999) on wind waves on deep water, gravity–capillary solitary waves were observed and found to closely match numerical profiles obtained by Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1989) and Vanden-Broeck & Dias (Reference Vanden-Broeck and Dias1992). Longuet-Higgins & Zhang (Reference Longuet-Higgins and Zhang1997) generated experimentally gravity–capillary solitary waves on deep water by the resonant excitation of surface waves at a velocity below the minimum of gravity–capillary waves. The mechanism of generation is due to a jet of air impinging on the surface of steady current. Forced three-dimensional gravity–capillary solitary waves on deep water (called lumps) have been investigated experimentally by several authors (Dorio et al. Reference Dorio, Cho, Duncan and Akylas2011; Park & Cho Reference Park and Cho2016; Masnadi & Duncan Reference Masnadi and Duncan2017a ,Reference Masnadi and Duncan b ).
To the best of our knowledge, there is no study regarding the effect of constant vorticity on the transverse instability of two-dimensional envelope solitons. On the contrary, many investigations on the transverse instability have been carried out in the absence of vorticity. Zakharov & Rubenchik (Reference Zakharov and Rubenchik1974) and Saffman & Yuen (Reference Saffman and Yuen1978) demonstrated that plane gravity envelope solitons are unstable to long wave transverse perturbations. Later on, Ablowitz & Segur (Reference Ablowitz and Segur1979) extended their analyses to show equivalent results in the case of finite depth. Deconinck, Pelinovsky & Carter (Reference Deconinck, Pelinovsky and Carter2006) obtained a variety of transverse instabilities of gravity envelope solitons in infinite depth. Within the framework of the fully nonlinear potential flow equations Kim & Akylas (Reference Kim and Akylas2007) found that plane gravity–capillary solitary waves of depression are unstable to transverse perturbations. Kim (Reference Kim2012) verified the long wave transverse instability within the framework of the weakly nonlinear third-order truncation model. The presence of transverse instability suggests the existence of solitary lumps which are the three-dimensional counterpart of plane gravity–capillary solitary waves. Our purpose is not to consider three-dimensional localised solitary gravity–capillary waves. Akers & Milewski (Reference Akers and Milewski2009, Reference Akers and Milewski2010), Wang & Milewski (Reference Wang and Milewski2012) and Milewski & Wang (Reference Milewski and Wang2014) used several model equations to investigate numerically the stability of two-dimensional and three-dimensional gravity–capillary solitary waves in deep water. Regarding two-dimensional waves they found that gravity–capillary solitary waves of both elevation and depression are unstable to transverse perturbations.
The purpose of the present paper is twofold: (i) to revisit the problem of two-dimensional gravity–capillary waves of solitary type on deep water when the effect of an underlying vertically sheared current is taken into account and (ii) to investigate the stability of one-dimensional gravity–capillary solitons, solution of the NLS equation, to transverse perturbation in the presence of constant vorticity.
Section 2 is devoted to the computation of the bifurcated gravity–capillary solitary wave on deep water in the presence of constant vorticity. In § 3 the stability of its envelope to infinitesimal transverse perturbations is investigated.
2 Gravity–capillary solitary waves with constant vorticity
We consider envelope-soliton bifurcation from a uniform gravity–capillary wave train in the presence of vorticity. Our study is confined to two-dimensional water waves propagating in infinite depth. The fluid is considered inviscid and incompressible. The waves move along the
$x$
-axis and the
$z$
-axis is oriented upwards opposite to the gravity
$\boldsymbol{g}=(0,-g)$
. The origin
$z=0$
is the undisturbed free surface. The waves are travelling at the surface of a vertically sheared current of constant vorticity. In the fixed frame the underlying current is given by
$U(z)=U_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}z$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
is the shear intensity and
$U_{0}$
is the current velocity at the surface. Note that the vorticity is
$-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. We choose a reference frame moving with the horizontal velocity
$U_{0}$
. Consequently, in this frame of reference the current at the surface vanishes and the underlying current is given by
$U(z)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}z$
.
Very recently, Hsu et al. (Reference Hsu, Kharif, Abid and Chen2018) derived a nonlinear Schrödinger equation for the envelope of two-dimensional gravity–capillary waves propagating on arbitrary depth at the free surface of a vertically sheared current of constant vorticity
$-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. Herein, we consider the case of infinite depth. This NLS equation for the complex envelope of the elevation is written as follows:
where
$a$
is the complex envelope of the free surface elevation which depends on slow variables
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}(x-c_{g}t)$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}^{2}t$
. The group velocity of the carrier wave of wavenumber
$k$
and frequency
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$
is
$c_{g}$
. We consider weakly nonlinear waves and consequently we set
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\ll 1$
.
The dispersion coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$
is written
with
where
The inverse of the Bond number is
where
$T$
is the surface tension coefficient and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}$
the water density.
The nonlinear coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }$
is
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE} & = & \displaystyle \frac{k^{4}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})}\left[-\frac{3\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}}(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(8+6\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})+\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}{1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}(2+3\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\left.2\frac{(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}-(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})/(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705})}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}\right]\end{eqnarray}$$
and
Equation (2.1) admits the following solution:
and the elevation of a weakly nonlinear wave train of envelope
$a(\unicode[STIX]{x1D709},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F})$
is written as
where
$k$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$
are the carrier wavenumber and carrier frequency,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\ll 1$
and
$\text{c.c.}$
denotes the complex conjugation. The wave height at the origin is
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}a_{0}$
.
The crests of the wave group travel at phase velocity
whereas the envelope travels at group velocity
$c_{g}$
.
The condition for the envelope soliton to be a solitary wave is that the group velocity is equal to the phase velocity
$c_{g}=c$
:
Whatever the value of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
is, the nonlinear coefficient of the NLS equation is negative (see figure 1), therefore the solitary wave travels at a constant velocity which is a little less than the minimum phase velocity of linear gravity–capillary waves.
Dimensionless nonlinear coefficient,
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}$
, of the NLS equation as a function of the vorticity.

Following Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1993), we set
$g=1$
,
$T=1$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}=1$
which is equivalent to using
$(T/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}g)^{1/2}$
and
$(T/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}g^{3})^{1/4}$
as unit of length and unit of time, respectively. For the sake of clarity the same symbols are used to define the dimensionless frequency, vorticity and wavenumber. Then, the nonlinear coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }$
becomes in dimensionless form
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE} & = & \displaystyle \frac{k^{4}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})}\left[-\frac{3k^{2}}{1+k^{2}}(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(8+6\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})+\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}{1-k^{2}(2+3\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\left.2\frac{(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}-(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})/(1+k^{2})}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{2}\right],\end{eqnarray}$$
with
and
The dimensionless linear dispersion relation is
The dimensionless linear phase velocity and group velocity are equal at the linear phase velocity minimum which occurs when
$k$
is solution of the following equation:
For the case
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
which was considered by Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1993) we find
$k=1$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=\sqrt{2}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }(k)=-11\sqrt{2}/32$
. Then, the velocity of the solitary wave is
which is equation (3.19) of Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1993).
Equation (2.18) admits the following approximate solution:
Then
Negative vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}>0$
) reduces
$k$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$
whereas positive vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<0$
) increases
$k$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$
.
An approximate solution of (2.12) is
which can be rewritten as follows:
Solitary wave velocity is increased when the vorticity is positive (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<0$
) and reduced when the vorticity is negative (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}>0$
).
To extend the work of Akylas (Reference Akylas1993), we investigate the bifurcation of a train of periodic gravity–capillary waves into a solitary wave with decaying oscillatory tail in the presence of constant vorticity. Now, we use
$T/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{2})$
and
$T/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{3})$
as unit length and unit time where
$c$
is the phase velocity of the envelope soliton, which means that
$c$
is the reference phase velocity scale. Note that these time and length units were used by Vanden-Broeck & Dias (Reference Vanden-Broeck and Dias1992) and Akylas (Reference Akylas1993). Consequently, with these new scaled variables the dimensionless form of the NLS equation (2.1) becomes
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=gT/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{4})$
,
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{3}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}/T$
,
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}/T$
,
$\tilde{a}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{2}a/T$
,
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/T$
and
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }}=Tc\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}g^{2})$
.
Using
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}=T\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{3})$
,
$\tilde{k}=Tk/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{2})$
,
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}}=T\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}c^{3})$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}=\tilde{k}^{2}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
the coefficient
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }}$
is
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }} & = & \displaystyle \frac{\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}\tilde{k}^{4}(1+\tilde{k}^{2}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})^{2}}{8(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})^{3}(2\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})}\left\{-\frac{3\tilde{k}^{2}(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})^{2}}{\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}^{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}+\tilde{k}^{2})}+\frac{(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})(8\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+6\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})}{\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}^{2}}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\left.\frac{(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}-\tilde{k}^{2}(2\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+3\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{1}})+\frac{2(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})(2\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})^{2}\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}}^{2}}{\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}^{4}(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}(\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}+\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}})/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}+\tilde{k}^{2}))}\right\},\end{eqnarray}$$
where
and
Let
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{2}\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }}$
. For
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}}=0$
, we have checked that
$-\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}$
is equal to the expression derived by Akylas (Reference Akylas1993). In figure 1 is plotted the nonlinear coefficient
$\tilde{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}$
as a function of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. An enlargement is inserted in the figure in the vicinity of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}\approx -0.2$
to show that this coefficient is always negative.
The dimensionless form of the dispersive coefficient is
where
and
The dimensionless NLS equation (2.24) becomes, dropping the tildes,
and the free surface elevation is written as
The condition for the envelope soliton to be a solitary wave is, due to the chosen normalisation,
$c_{g}=c=1$
:
Hence,
For infinite depth, the dimensionless linear gravity–capillary dispersion relation in the presence of a shear of intensity
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
is
which has a minimum in phase velocity at
$k=k_{0}$
. At this minimum the phase velocity is equal to the group velocity
Solving these two equations gives
and
For
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
the values of Akylas (Reference Akylas1993) are rediscovered. Note that the shear has no effect on the dimensionless value of
$k_{0}$
. Nevertheless, with the scaled variables used by Longuet-Higgins (Reference Longuet-Higgins1993) equation (2.37) reduces to (2.20) at
$O(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA})$
.
Herein,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}>0$
and consequently
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}=1/2$
. From the dispersion relation (2.35), it can be demonstrated that we always have
$-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$
or
$-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}<\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. In our case the carrier wave frequency is close to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}$
and as a result the considered values of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
are larger than a value close to
$-1/2$
.
The wavenumber
$k$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
are expanded about
$(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})$
as follows:
Expanding
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(k,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})$
about
$(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})$
and using (2.34) with
$\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}k(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})=1$
gives
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}k_{1}=-\frac{\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}^{2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\unicode[STIX]{x2202}k}(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})}{\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}^{2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}k^{2}}(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{1}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Using
we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}k_{1}=-\frac{\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}^{2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\unicode[STIX]{x2202}k}(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}(k_{0},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0})}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{1}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
be the difference between
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
and the critical value
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0}$
:
Knowing that
then
From (2.48) and figure 1 we can see that the wave height decreases as positive values of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
increase. For negative values of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
the wave height presents a maximum in the vicinity of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}\approx -0.2$
. Finally,
Knowing that
and
then
and
Note that in the absence of vorticity the dimensionless carrier wavenumber is unchanged at
$O(\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}^{2})$
. Negative vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}>0$
) reduces
$k$
whereas positive vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<0$
) increases
$k$
.
Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of elevation: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
) and dashed line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0.10$
).

Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of elevation: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
) and dashed line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.1$
).

The expression for the solitary wave is
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D701}(x,t) & = & \displaystyle \pm 16\left(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}{11+128\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}+464\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}^{2}+512\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}^{3}+192\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}^{4}}\right)^{1/2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\text{sech}\{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})^{1/2}(x-t)\}\cos \{k(x-t)\}.\end{eqnarray}$$
The profile of the solitary wave is known once the bifurcation parameter
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
is fixed. Equations (2.49) and (2.53) allow the determination of the parameters
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}a_{0}$
and
$k$
, respectively. Profiles of solitary waves of elevation and depression which bifurcate at
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{0}$
from a linear uniform periodic wave train of frequency
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}$
and wavenumber
$k_{0}$
, are plotted in figures 2, 3, 4 and 5. For negative vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}>0$
), an increase of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
leads to a decrease of the wave height (see figures 2 and 4). For positive vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<0$
), an increase of
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}|$
may lead to an increase (see figures 3, 5, 6 and 7) of wave height.
Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of depression: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
) and dashed line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0.10$
).

Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of depression: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
) and dashed line
$(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.1)$
.

Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of elevation: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.10$
) and dashed line
$(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.4)$
.

Dimensionless profiles of solitary waves of depression: solid line (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.10$
) and dashed line
$(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.4)$
.

3 Transverse instability of the envelope of gravity–capillary solitary waves with constant vorticity
The two-dimensional version of the NLS equation in deep water (2.1) is
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$
is the transverse coordinate and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\ast }/2$
.
The transverse dispersion coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}$
is written as
For
$\unicode[STIX]{x2202}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}=0$
, equation (3.1) admits the following solution:
where
Let us perturb the solution (3.3) with an infinitesimal perturbation:
Linearisation of (3.1) about
$\bar{a}$
gives
Let us consider
$a^{\prime }=u+\text{i}v$
(with
$u$
and
$v$
real) and substitute this expression into (3.6):
The system (3.7)–(3.8) of linear partial differential equations with constant coefficients admits solutions of the following forms (normal modes):
Herein we can use the complex forms for
$u$
and
$v$
because we deal with linear equations.
Substitution of (3.9) and (3.10) into (3.8) and (3.7) gives
The above system can be written as follows:
with
and
and the eigenfunction
$\hat{u}$
vanishes as
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}|\rightarrow \infty$
.
The numerical method to solve (3.13) is outlined in appendix A.
Square of the dimensionless growth rate of the transverse unstable mode of the envelope of gravity–capillary solitary waves in deep water as a function of the square of the dimensionless wavenumber for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
(solid line),
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0.1$
(○) and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=-0.1$
(
$\star$
). The dashed lines correspond to the analytic expression given by (3.16).
$a_{0}=\sqrt{2}$
.

We set
$g=1$
,
$T=1$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{w}=1$
. For moderate and small values of the vorticity the coefficients of the NLS equation (3.1) are positive,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}>0$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}>0$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}>0$
. For comparison we use herein the analytic relation of the instability growth rate given by Rypdal & Rasmussen (Reference Rypdal and Rasmussen1989) which is written in dimensionless form as
The maximum growth rate is
and
The gravity–capillary solitary wave is marginally stable for
$q=q_{c}$
with
For small values of the vorticity the instability growth rate and marginal wavenumber are
and
In figure 8 is shown the numerical and analytic instability growth rates for several values of the vorticity. The solid lines correspond to numerical solutions of (3.13). Negative vorticity amplifies the rate of growth whereas positive vorticity reduces its value. The surface elevation of the envelope of gravity–capillary solitary waves perturbed by their most unstable modes corresponding to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
,
$q=1.01$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0.10$
,
$q=1.08$
are shown in figure 9. These waves, which are localized in the direction of propagation and periodic in the transverse direction, have been investigated by Milewski & Wang (Reference Milewski and Wang2014). This new solution found by those authors was called a transversally periodic plane solitary wave.
Surface elevations of perturbed envelopes of gravity–capillary solitary waves of depression in deep water for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}=1$
,
$q_{max}=1.01$
(a) and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=0.10$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}=0.86$
,
$q_{max}=1.08$
(b).

4 Conclusion
Within the framework of the one-dimensional and two-dimensional NLS equations, the effect of constant vorticity on the properties and stability of gravity–capillary solitary waves in deep water has been investigated. These two-dimensional solitary waves of elevation and depression type bifurcate from linear uniform wave trains at the phase speed minimum where the phase velocity equals the group velocity. We found that negative vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}>0$
) reduces the wave height whereas positive vorticity (
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}<0$
) increases the wave height. Numerical and analytic instability growth rates of transverse perturbations have been computed and derived, respectively. We have shown that negative vorticity amplifies the rate of growth and bandwidth of transverse instability whereas positive vorticity diminishes both the rate of growth and bandwidth.
Appendix A. Numerical method to solve (3.13)
The eigenfunctions
$\hat{u}$
are computed numerically using the interpolant function (Boyd Reference Boyd1989; Tang Reference Tang1993; Weideman & Reddy Reference Weideman and Reddy2000)
where
and
$H_{N}(x)$
is the Hermite polynomial of degree
$N$
. The grid points
$x_{1},\ldots ,x_{N}$
are the roots of
$H_{N}(x)$
. Note that for continuous eigenfunctions on
$\mathbb{R}$
vanishing at infinity they can be uniformly approximated by functions of the form
$\exp (-x^{2})p(x)$
where
$p$
is a polynomial (see Lang (Reference Lang1991) p. 62).
This spectral interpolant automatically enforces the vanishing of the eigenfunctions at
$\pm \infty$
. We used
$N=160$
grid points giving a domain half-size
$L=8.61$
(
$x\in [-L,L]$
). With this choice, we obtained
$|\hat{u} _{N}(\pm L)|=O(10^{-8})$
.









