Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2005
It should come as no surprise that both the amount and pace of administrative work thatdepartments must accomplish at almost all higher education institutions has increasedsubstantially over the past 10 years. If this is news to you just talk to your departmentadministrator—if she/he has time to have a pleasant conversation. After all, for mostinstitutions, operations budgets have been cut and professional and classified staff havebeen reduced, while at the same time, administrative work has escalated in response toincreases in student enrollments, greater demands for accountability, the increasingimportance of fund raising efforts, and the generation of sponsored research. No wonder thatthe lives of department chairs, administrators, and other professional and classified staffhave become more challenging. The increase in administrative work at the department level islargely a function of increases in administrative mandates.
It should come as no surprise that both the amount and pace of administrative work that departments must accomplish at almost all higher education institutions has increased substantially over the past 10 years. If this is news to you just talk to your department administrator—if she/he has time to have a pleasant conversation. After all, for most institutions, operations budgets have been cut and professional and classified staff have been reduced, while at the same time, administrative work has escalated in response to increases in student enrollments, greater demands for accountability, the increasing importance of fund raising efforts, and the generation of sponsored research. No wonder that the lives of department chairs, administrators, and other professional and classified staff have become more challenging. The increase in administrative work at the department level is largely a function of increases in administrative mandates.
Administrative mandates are temporary or new permanent tasks that departments, programs, or centers must accomplish that are not accompanied by additional resources (money and/or staff). Tasks such as payroll, travel arrangements and reimbursements, grant and contract administration, web site construction and maintenance, computer technical support, and class scheduling have been decentralized to the department level, with central administration providing only computing and administrative support and technical training. Academic reports are more frequent and require more effort. In addition, tasks such as visiting committees, newsletters, alumni outreach programs, and donor and fund raising events have all become standard department tasks requiring department resources.
There are at least four reasons for the increase in administrative mandates. For one, budget cuts and staff reductions create a situation where there is less money and fewer staff to do more work. Second, higher education faces pressures for greater accountability. Legislators, Higher Education Boards, parents, the business community, tax payers, and donors expect improved education and greater research output with the same or fewer resources. Institutions must be able to demonstrate that they are using their resources effectively and efficiently. This requires more documentation and analysis on the part of all levels of administration for such things as objective student learning outcomes, graduation rates, and faculty/student contact hours. Third, there is greater competition among departments for resources such as faculty lines, teaching assistantship allocations, graduate student fellowships, faculty leaves (sabbaticals), computer equipment, student technology fee money, and curriculum transformation initiatives. To win these resources, department heads have to prepare better proposals with more persuasive arguments containing concrete evidence of need. Finally, central administrations need to demonstrate they are lean and efficient. But the work still must be done somewhere. So, some of the administrative burdens are shifted down to departments—analogous to shifting of work and tax burdens from the federal government to state and local government.
As one fellow department chair commented, “How do we respond (to increased administrative mandates)? I suppose most of us make the best efforts we can, knowing we are not doing what we should be doing, and feeling badly about it.” You cannot do it all yourself; this applies to department chairs and administrators alike. While it is certainly possible to do almost all the work associated with increases in administrative mandates, two things are likely to happen. Either you will not have time to do other important things such as research, teaching, and other important department functions, or you will be so frustrated and overworked that the quality of your work will diminish. Both situations are liable to make you finally throw in the towel and quit. It is important to understand department priorities and goals. Some administrative tasks and reports are crucial to achieving those goals and deserve serious effort. Others are not and should not warrant major effort.