Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:09:06.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tectonometamorphic evolution of the Trivandrum and Southern Madurai blocks in the Southern Granulite Terrane, south India: correlation with south-central Madagascar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2022

P Praharaj
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela – 769008, India
S Rekha*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela – 769008, India
*
Corresponding author: S. Rekha, Emails: srekha@nitrkl.ac.in; georekha@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Detailed structural investigations across the Achankovil terrane boundary shear zone (AKSZ) system show distinct differences in the geometry of superposed fold structures between the Trivandrum (TB) and Southern Madurai (SMB) blocks separated by the AKSZ. The metamorphic temperatures and pressures estimated from the SMB and TB have a similar range, that is, 600–880°C and 5–8 kbar. The similar clockwise P-T paths retrieved by phase equilibrium modelling from both the blocks represent the last deformation and metamorphism shared between them during their accretion along the AKSZ. The distinct evolutionary history of the SMB and TB prior to their amalgamation is supported by the contrasting structural, metamorphic and chronological patterns, particularly the lack of prominent middle Neoproterozoic ages and the presence of Palaeoproterozoic ages in the TB, and vice versa in the SMB. The prominent 600–500 Ma monazite ages in the TB, SMB and AKSZ attest to their timing of accretion along the AKSZ. The study corroborates the S-directed subduction model proposed for terrane accretion along the AKSZ, and provides further insight into the subduction–accretion–collision tectonics associated with the late Neoproterozoic – Cambrian evolutionary history of this region.

The tectonothermal histories and geochronology of the SMB and TB are compared to the once adjoined crustal domains of Madagascar within Gondwanaland. It is suggested that the TB is equivalent to the Androyan and Anosyan domains of southern Madagascar, the SMB is equivalent to the Antananarivo and Itremo–Ikalamavony blocks of the central Madagascar, and the sinistral AKSZ is contiguous with the Ranotsara Shear Zone in southern Madagascar.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of Southern Granulite Terrane (SGT) showing different crustal blocks and intervening shear zones (after Praharaj et al.2021). The northern and southern Madurai blocks are demarcated (after Plavsa et al.2012). The inset map (top right) shows the location of the SGT within India. Reported ultrahigh-temperature localities of Trivandrum and Madurai blocks are indicated by filled stars. SZ – Shear zone; KKPT SZ – Karur-Kambarn-Painavu-Trichur shear zone.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the study area marked in Figure 1 (after Praharaj et al.2021) showing the Southern Madurai Block, Trivandrum Block and location of the Achankovil Shear Zone (AKSZ) proposed by Praharaj et al. (2021). Location of the Thenmala Shear Zone (ThSZ) (Sacks et al.1997) is marked. Squares (green) are the locations of monazite-dated samples and filled stars (yellow) are the locations of samples used in P-T calculations. White filled circles are the important key localities within the study area.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Field photographs from the (a–c) Southern Madurai Block and (d–f) Trivandrum Block. Hammer head and the marker pen (15 cm long) point north. (a) Planar view of garnet-biotite gneiss showing S2M (M denotes Southern Madurai Block) gneissic layering defined by the quartz-feldspar-rich leucocratic and biotite-rich melanocratic layers; note the boudinage structure and ptygmatic fold in leucosomes. Garnet occurs as dispersed coarse porphyroblasts or arranged in aggregates within the leucosomes. Garnets also rim the interphase between the mesosome and the leucosome. (b) Section view (looking west) of prominent S2M fabric in charnockites. (c) The dextral shears (S3) folding the S2M gneissic layering in khondalites along which leucosomes have been emplaced. (d) Section view (looking east) showing penetrative gently to moderately dipping S2T (T denotes Trivandrum Block) layers in weathered khondalites; note the locally preserved hinge of interfolial isoclinal folds on former S1T layers. (e) Plan view of rootless fold hinges of S1T layers within the interfolial domain of S2T fabric in charnockites. (f) Plan view of garnet-biotite gneisses with patchy charnockites.

Figure 3

Table 1. Details of the samples used in petrography, mineral chemistry, P-T estimations, phase equilibria modelling and monazite geochronology. Apt – apatite; Bt – biotite; Crd – cordierite; Grt – garnet; Hbl – hornblende; Ilm – ilmenite; Kfs – K-feldspar; Opx – orthopyroxene; Pl – plagioclase; Qtz – quartz; Rt – rutile; Sil – sillimanite. Mineral abbreviations after Kretz (1983).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Representative microphotographs (a, d and e are plane-polarized images and b, c and f–i are crossed-polar images) from the Southern Madurai Block. (a) Garnet-biotite gneisses showing the S2M fabric defined by the shape-preferred orientation of biotite. (b) Sub-grain rotation recrystallization (white arrow) in quartz, and (c) grain boundary migration between quartz and K-feldspar (black arrow) in garnet-biotite gneisses. (d) Charnockite with garnet, orthopyroxene, plagioclase, K-feldspar and quartz. (e) Orthopyroxenes in charnockite partially replaced by biotites. (f) Granoblastic texture with well equilibrated triple junctions among K-feldspar, quartz and plagioclase (white arrow) and (g) myrmekite texture (white arrow) in charnockites. Khondalite showing biotite and sillimanite enclosed within (h) first-generation cordierite (Crd1) and (i) second-generation cordierites (Crd2) surrounding garnet. Mineral abbreviations are after Kretz (1983).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Representative microphotographs (e and g are plane-polarized images and remaining are crossed-polar images) from the Trivandrum Block. (a) Khondalite showing biotite and needle-like sillimanite enclosed within first-generation cordierite (Crd1) and (b) second-generation cordierites (Crd2) surrounding garnet. Images from khondalite showing (c) grain-boundary migration with lobate cuspate boundaries (white arrow) and (d) myrmekite texture between quartz and plagioclase (white arrow). (e) Charnockites showing orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, hornblende, plagioclase, K-feldspar and quartz. (f) Orthopyroxene in charnockite partially replaced by biotite. (g) Garnet-biotite gneiss showing fabric-defining biotite and garnet porphyroblast. Images from garnet-biotite gneisses showing (h) granoblastic texture, (i) sub-grain rotation recrystallization and (j) quartz with undulose extinction. Mineral abbreviations are after Kretz (1983).

Figure 6

Table 2. Electronprobe microanalytical data and structural formulae of single representative mineral grain analysis from different rocks used for thermobarometry from the Southern Madurai Block. Mineral abbreviations after Kretz (1983).

Figure 7

Table 3. Electronprobe microanalytical data and structural formulae of single representative mineral grain analysis from different rocks used for thermobarometry from the Trivandrum Block. Mineral abbreviations after Kretz (1983).

Figure 8

Table 4. Estimated temperature (°C) at P = 7 kbar using mineral thermometry. Sample locations are indicated in Figure 2. n – nearest neighbor mineral in matrix; r – rim of mineral. Mineral abbreviations after Kretz (1983).

Figure 9

Table 5. Estimated pressure (kbar) at T = 700°C using mineral barometry. Sample locations are indicated in Figure 2.

Figure 10

Fig. 6. NCKFMASH P-T pseudosections of khondalites (a and d), garnet-biotite gneisses (b and e) and charnockites (c and f). (a–c) Southern Madurai Block; (d–f) Trivandrum Block. The diagrams show stable mineral assemblages in the P-T window of 3–10 kbar and 450–900 °C. The molar proportions of element oxides used in the computations are shown in a box at the top of each diagram. Area marked with black bold line represents the texturally relevant stable phase assemblages used in reconstructing the P-T path. Red arrows show the possible clockwise P-T paths experienced by the rocks. Mineral abbreviations are after Kretz (1983), except Fs – feldspar.

Figure 11

Fig. 7. Summary diagram showing P-T path from the (a) Southern Madurai and (b) Trivandrum blocks. The texturally relevant stable phase assemblages from each P-T psuedosection and P-T paths (in red) are combined (shown with black bold line and red arrow in Fig. 6) to construct a common P-T path. Bold purple arrow shows the possible clockwise P-T path experienced by the rocks. P-T paths from previous studies are drawn for reference. T1: Tateishi et al. (2004); T2: Tsunogae & Santosh (2006); T3: Braun et al. (2007); T4: Tsunogae & Santosh (2010); T5: Blereau et al. (2016); T6: Shabeer et al. (2002); T7: Tadokoro et al. (2008); T8: Kröner et al. (2015); T9: Chacko et al. (1987); T10: Kadowaki et al. (2019); T11: Wang et al. (2021). Relative stability fields of kyanite-sillimanite-andalusite are marked for reference.

Figure 12

Fig. 8. Backscattered electron images showing the textural settings of monazites in various rock types of the (a–d) Southern Madurai Block and (e–h) Trivandrum Block. (a) Monazite at the interface between quartz and garnet in garnet-biotite gneiss. (b) One monazite growing parallel to the fabric-defining biotite and the other hosted within K-feldspar in garnet-biotite gneiss. (c) One monazite (bottom left) overgrowing the fabric-defining biotite and the other monazite (in the middle) occurs at the interface between quartz and recrystallized plagioclase in garnetiferous charnockite. (d) Monazite hosted within the recrystallized quartz-plagioclase matrix in garnetiferous charnockite. (e) Monazites within quartz (middle), garnet (right) and at the interphase between quartz and garnet (left) in khondalite. (f) Monazite within recrystallized plagioclase (bottom left) and growing parallel to the fabric-defining biotite (middle) in khondalite. (g) Monazites within garnet in garnet-biotite gneiss. (h) Monazite included in biotite hosted within garnet in garnet-biotite gneiss.

Figure 13

Fig. 9. Th and Y X-ray element maps and backscattered electron images of representative monazites from the (a, b) Southern Madurai Block, hosted in the matrix of garnet-biotite gneisses, and the (c–f) Trivandrum Block. Hosted within (c, d, f) garnet and (e) matrix of khondalites. White circles and keyed numbers are locations of analysed spots and spot ages (± 2σ error) in Ma, respectively.

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Probability density plots of monazite age data from different lithologies of the study area (sample locations in Fig. 2). Data from (a) garnet-biotite gneisses and (b) garnetiferous charnockites from the Southern Madurai Block and from (c) khondalites and (d) garnet-biotite gneisses from the Trivandrum Block. (e) Date from the Achankovil Shear Zone khondalite obtained from the present study (in red) and the monazite age data from garnet-biotite gneisses by Praharaj et al. (2021) (in green) are plotted. Number of samples analysed (s) and number of spot ages (n). Errors are in ± 2σ.

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Schematic plate tectonic model across the Achankovil Shear Zone (modified after Rajesh et al.2013) illustrating Neoproterozoic–Cambrian tectonic evolution of the Southern Madurai and Trivandrum blocks. Structural evidence in support of the S-wards subduction model is incorporated in the diagram (details in Praharaj et al.2021).

Figure 16

Fig. 12. Compilation of existing Pb–Pb zircon and U–Th–total Pb monazite ages from (a) south-central Madagascar (data sources: Berger et al.2006; Giese et al.2011; Jöns & Schenk, 2011; Tucker et al.2011; Collins et al.2012; Archibald et al.2015, 2016; Holder et al.2018) and (b) Trivandrum and Southern Madurai blocks of the Southern Granulite Terrane (data sources: Braun et al.1998; Braun & Brocker, 2004; Santosh et al.2005a, 2006, 2009, 2017; Braun & Appel, 2006; Collins et al.2007; Plavsa et al.2012; Harley & Nandakumar, 2014; Taylor et al.2014; Kröner et al.2015; Li et al.2016; Kadowaki et al.2019; Praharaj et al.2021). Major domains in south-cental Madagascar (simplified after Tucker et al.2011) are shown. The lithologies in (b) are as for Figure 2.

Figure 17

Fig. 13. Diagram showing the proposed palaeoposition of Madagascar and India as part of East Gondwana (modified after Praharaj et al.2021). The Trivandrum Block is approximately equivalent to southern Madagascar, the Southern Madurai Block to central Madagascar, and the Achankovil Shear Zone (AKSZ) to the Ranotsara Shear Zone (RSZ). SMB – Southern Madurai Block; NMB – Northern Madurai Block; C – Coorg Block; N – Nilgiri Block; M-B – Moyar-Bhavani Shear Zone; P – Palghat-Cauvery Shear Zone; KKPT – Karur-Kamban-Painavu-Trichur Shear Zone; TSZ – Tranomaro Shear Zone.

Supplementary material: File

Praharaj and Rekha supplementary material

Praharaj and Rekha supplementary material

Download Praharaj and Rekha supplementary material(File)
File 5.7 MB