Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:12:50.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production of fine-grained foils by large strain extrusion-machining of textured Ti–6Al–4V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2017

Karthik Palaniappan
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Design, IIT Madras, Chennai-600 036, India
H. Murthy
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai-600 036, India
Balkrishna C. Rao*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Design, IIT Madras, Chennai-600 036, India
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: balkrish@iitm.ac.in

Abstract

The large strain extrusion-machining process has been used to refine the microstructure in a Titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V). The unconstrained cutting or machining of Ti–6Al–4V entails the formation of shear localized chips at nearly all cutting speeds, thereby hindering the use of extrusion-machining to produce fine-grained materials. The present effort attempts to suppress shear localization by the suitable modification of texture in Ti–6Al–4V through the cold-rolling process prior to extrusion-machining. Ti–6Al–4V plates were cold rolled to 30, 40, 45, and 47% thickness reductions. These textured plates were extrusion machined using a suitably designed fixture leading to fine-grained continuous foils with increased hardness. Microscopy has revealed that the suppression of shear localization in the foils produced from plates which are cold rolled to more than 40% of thickness reduction is triggered by texture formation. For thickness reductions slightly lower than 40% (e.g., 30%), suppression can be achieved only by a combination of texture and extrusion.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Ti–6Al–4V alloy chemical composition (wt% of different elements) for the as-received sample.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. (a) Fixture for implementing large strain extrusion-machining, (b) schematic of the single-edge restricted-contact cutting tool. (c) HAAS milling machine setup with tool alignment fixture. (d) Verification of tool alignment using a quick stop method with the painted unmachined surface. (e) The HAAS milling machine setup with LSEM fixture and the Ti–6Al–4V workpiece. (f) Raw extruded foils from extrusion-machining process.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a, b) Schematic showing the sample reference frame and direction of the cutting tool movement (rolling direction, normal direction, transverse direction), and (c) Samples cut from Ti–6Al–4V plates and stacked for the XRD measurement.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. X-ray diffraction profiles of as-received, as-received 47% cold-rolled, annealed, annealed 30% cold-rolled, annealed 40% cold-rolled, and annealed 45% cold-rolled bulk specimens.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Recalculated (0002) pole figures of (a) as-received, (b) as-received 47% cold-rolled, (c) annealed, (d) annealed 30% cold-rolled, (e) annealed 40% cold-rolled, and (f) annealed 45% cold-rolled bulk samples.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. ODF of φ2 sections of (a) annealed, (b) annealed 30% cold-rolled, and (c) annealed 40% cold-rolled bulk samples.

Figure 6

TABLE II. Texture components of annealed, annealed 30% cold-rolled and annealed 40% cold-rolled bulk samples.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Optical micrographs of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy samples from: (a) the as-received bulk, (b) the as-received 47% cold-rolled bulk, (c) the annealed bulk, (d) the annealed 30% cold-rolled bulk, (e) the annealed 40% cold-rolled bulk, and (f) the annealed 45% cold-rolled bulk.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Optical micrographs of chips/foils at a compression ratio of 1.4 from: (a) the as-received bulk, (b) the as-received 47% cold-rolled bulk, (c) the annealed bulk, (d) the annealed 30% cold-rolled bulk, (e) the annealed 40% cold-rolled bulk, and (f) the annealed 45% cold-rolled bulk.

Figure 9

TABLE III. Average grain sizes and Vickers hardness values for the as-received and annealed bulk at different thickness reductions (by cold-rolling) and their foils obtained during the LSEM process. Average values are reported along with the standard deviation. Results for foils without cold-rolling are not reported since the foils were serrated due to shear localization and hence are undesirable.

Figure 10

FIG. 8. TEM micrographs of foil from LSEM of annealed 45% cold-rolled Ti–6Al–4V plate. The arrows indicate elongated and equiaxed grains in (a) and (b), respectively.