Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:57:47.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorptive Removal Of Ni2+ Ions From Aqueous Solutions by Nodular Sepiolite (Meerschaum) and Industrial Sepiolite Samples From Eskişehir, Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

İlker Kıpçak*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey
Emel Kurtaran Ersal
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey
Mine Özdemir
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480, Eskişehir, Turkey
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: ikipcak@ogu.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heavy metals in the environment are a problem due to their toxicity and bioaccumulation. Adsorptive removal of heavy metals by clay minerals has garnered increasing attention due to the abundance, low cost, and exceptional physicochemical properties of the clays. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the utilization of two Turkish sepiolite samples, nodular sepiolite (NS) and industrial sepiolite (IS), as adsorbents in removing Ni2+ ions from aqueous solutions. The specific surface areas of NS and IS are 182.19 m2 g–1 and 63.78 m2 g–1, respectively. The effects of adsorbent dosage, initial pH, contact time, initial concentration, and temperature on the adsorption of Ni2+ ions onto the sepiolite samples were investigated using a batch method. The optimum adsorbent dosage was determined as 0.6 g/50 mL of adsorbent and the optimum pH value was 6.0, for both sepiolite samples. The adsorption process obeyed the Freundlich isotherm model (KF: 4.89–9.73 mg1–1/n L1/n g–1 for NS and 4.27–6.42 mg1–1/n L1/n g–1 for IS) and the pseudo-second order kinetics model (k2: 0.0049–0.0397 g mg–1 min–1 for NS and 0.0688–0.1195 g mg–1 min–1 for IS). The adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic, and the randomness increased. The samples exhibited large adsorption capacities through three cycles of adsorption-desorption tests. The results revealed that the sepiolite samples are promising as cost-effective adsorbents for the removal of Ni2+ ions from aqueous solutions.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2020
Figure 0

Table 1. Chemical compositions of NS and IS

Figure 1

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of NS and IS (S: sepiolite, M: magnesite, D: dolomite)

Figure 2

Table 2. Textural properties deduced from N2 adsorption at 77 K for NS and IS

Figure 3

Fig. 2. SEM images of NS, IS, NS-Ni, and IS-Ni samples. Scale bars are 2.00 μm

Figure 4

Fig. 3. EDS elemental analyses of NS, IS, NS-Ni, and IS-Ni samples

Figure 5

Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of NS, IS, NS-Ni, and IS-Ni samples

Figure 6

Table 3. Functional groups in NS, NS-Ni, IS, and IS-Ni samples

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Effect of adsorbent dosage on the removal of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS (pH: 6.0, t: 24 h, C0: 50 mg L–1, T: 25°C). The error bars represent the standard deviation

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Effect of initial pH on the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS (adsorbent dosage: 0.6 g/50 mL, t: 24 h, C0: 50 mg L–1, T: 25°C). The error bars represent the standard deviation

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures (adsorbent dosage: 0.6 g/50 mL, pH: 6, C0: 50 mg L–1). The error bars represent the standard deviation

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Effect of initial concentration on the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures (adsorbent dosage: 0.6 g/50 mL, pH: 6, t: 24 h). The error bars represent the standard deviation

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order kinetics plots for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at 25°C

Figure 12

Table 4. Kinetics parameters for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Intraparticle diffusion plots for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm plots for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures

Figure 15

Table 5. Langmuir and Freundlich constants for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS at three temperatures

Figure 16

Table 6. Comparison of the adsorption abilities of various adsorbents for Ni

Figure 17

Fig. 12. Plots of ln Kd vs 1/T for estimation of thermodynamic state functions

Figure 18

Table 7. Thermodynamic state functions for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by NS and IS

Figure 19

Fig. 13. a Reusability of NS and IS for Ni2+ adsorption, b extent of dissolution of Mg and Ca during regeneration

Figure 20

Table 8. Cost estimation for the adsorbents used in this study

Figure 21

Table 9. Comparison of estimated cost of adsorbents reported for Ni removal